• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过两步入路法的全流程机器人辅助经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术:技术报告及初步结果

Whole-Workflow Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy via a Two-Step Access Method: Technical Report and Preliminary Results.

作者信息

Zheng Wenjie, Wu Junlong, Xia Wen, Zuo Rui, Chang Xian, Yin Hong, Li Changqing, Zhang Chao

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Xinqiao Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, People's Republic of China.

Department of Orthopaedics, The 941th Hospital of Joint Logistic Support Force of Chinese People Liberation Army, Xining, Qinghai, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Pain Res. 2025 Aug 25;18:4361-4371. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S540581. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.2147/JPR.S540581
PMID:40893122
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12396528/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The spinal surgery robot can provide precise preoperative or intraoperative surgical planning and guide the implementation of the surgical plan under real-time navigation monitoring. Researchers have recently begun exploring the use of robotic systems to assist in performing Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy (PELD). However, prior studies have primarily focused on robotic-assisted transforaminal puncture. In this study, we establish a two-step cannulation surgical workflow using specialized instruments to facilitate the whole-process robotic-assisted PELD.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this study, 14 patients with lumbar disc herniations were enrolled to undergo PELD assisted by a robotic system. Preoperative CT images were registered in the navigation system for surgical planning. The whole procedure was performed under spinal robotic guidance, including puncture, dilation, foraminoplasty, and working tube placement. A retrospective analysis was conducted to evaluate its feasibility and safety, as well as to summarize the surgical workflow.

RESULTS

All patients successfully completed the robotic-assisted PELD surgery. The average robot preparation time was 31.42±6.45 minutes, the cannula placement time was 9.85±2.59 minutes, and the mean operative time was 92.21±18.65 minutes. The average number of intraoperative fluoroscopy shots was 3.35±0.84. Postoperative follow-up showed significant improvement in back pain/leg pain VAS scores and ODI scores compared with preoperative values. According to the modified Macnab criteria, 8 cases were rated as excellent (57.1%), and 6 cases as good (42.9%), resulting in an overall satisfaction rate of 100%. No patients experienced severe complications such as nerve root injury or deep infection.

CONCLUSION

Robotic assistance in PELD surgery ensures a precise preoperative planning and safe implementation, also reducing radiation exposure both patients and surgeons. With specialized instruments, the two-step access method simplifies PELD as a safe and effective surgery.

摘要

目的

脊柱手术机器人能够提供精确的术前或术中手术规划,并在实时导航监测下指导手术计划的实施。研究人员最近开始探索使用机器人系统辅助进行经皮内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术(PELD)。然而,先前的研究主要集中在机器人辅助经椎间孔穿刺。在本研究中,我们使用专门器械建立了两步置管手术工作流程,以促进全过程机器人辅助PELD。

患者与方法

本研究纳入14例腰椎间盘突出症患者,接受机器人系统辅助的PELD手术。术前CT图像在导航系统中进行配准以进行手术规划。整个手术过程在脊柱机器人引导下进行,包括穿刺、扩张、椎间孔成形术和工作通道放置。进行回顾性分析以评估其可行性和安全性,并总结手术工作流程。

结果

所有患者均成功完成机器人辅助PELD手术。机器人准备平均时间为31.42±6.45分钟,套管放置时间为9.85±2.59分钟,平均手术时间为92.21±18.65分钟。术中平均透视次数为3.35±0.84次。术后随访显示,与术前相比,背痛/腿痛视觉模拟评分(VAS)和腰椎功能障碍指数(ODI)评分有显著改善。根据改良Macnab标准,8例评为优(57.1%),6例评为良(42.9%),总体满意率为100%。无患者发生神经根损伤或深部感染等严重并发症。

结论

机器人辅助PELD手术可确保精确的术前规划和安全实施,同时减少患者和术者的辐射暴露。通过专门器械,两步入路法简化了PELD手术,使其成为一种安全有效的手术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/145a/12396528/d2942becc7d7/JPR-18-4361-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/145a/12396528/ab1a3b0f8644/JPR-18-4361-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/145a/12396528/6d3c8b00626d/JPR-18-4361-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/145a/12396528/d2942becc7d7/JPR-18-4361-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/145a/12396528/ab1a3b0f8644/JPR-18-4361-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/145a/12396528/6d3c8b00626d/JPR-18-4361-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/145a/12396528/d2942becc7d7/JPR-18-4361-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Whole-Workflow Robotic-Assisted Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy via a Two-Step Access Method: Technical Report and Preliminary Results.通过两步入路法的全流程机器人辅助经皮内镜腰椎间盘切除术:技术报告及初步结果
J Pain Res. 2025 Aug 25;18:4361-4371. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S540581. eCollection 2025.
2
Unilateral biportal endoscopic discectomy versus percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy in the treatment of far-lateral lumbar disc herniation.单侧双通道内镜下椎间盘切除术与经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗极外侧腰椎间盘突出症的对比
Neurosurg Rev. 2025 Aug 4;48(1):588. doi: 10.1007/s10143-025-03748-y.
3
Minimally invasive surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a meta-analysis of efficacy and safety.腰椎间盘突出症的微创手术:疗效与安全性的Meta分析
Int J Surg. 2025 May 28. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002434.
4
Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Discectomy versus Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy in the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation Linked with Posterior Ring Apophysis Separation: A Retrospective Study.单侧双孔通道内镜下椎间盘切除术与经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗伴后环骨突分离的腰椎间盘突出症的回顾性研究
World Neurosurg. 2025 Jan;193:957-963. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.09.102. Epub 2024 Oct 16.
5
[A comparative study on the clinical efficacy and safety of unilateral biportal endoscopy versus percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy in the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation].单侧双通道内镜与经皮椎间孔镜下椎间盘切除术治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症的临床疗效及安全性比较研究
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2025 Sep 1;63(9):814-820. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112139-20241016-00463.
6
Sagittal Classification of Calcified Lumbar Disc Herniation and Therapeutic Analysis of Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy.钙化型腰椎间盘突出症的矢状面分型及经皮内镜下椎间孔入路椎间盘切除术的治疗分析
Orthop Surg. 2025 Aug 27. doi: 10.1111/os.70152.
7
Transforaminal Percutaneous Endoscopic Discectomy for L3/4 and L4/5 Foraminal and Extraforaminal Lumbar Disc Herniation: Clinical Outcomes and Technical Note.经椎间孔入路经皮内镜下L3/4和L4/5椎间孔及椎间孔外型腰椎间盘突出症切除术:临床疗效及技术要点
Asian J Neurosurg. 2025 Mar 10;20(2):337-343. doi: 10.1055/s-0045-1805018. eCollection 2025 Jun.
8
Comparison of short-term clinical outcomes and muscle injury in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis undergoing arthroscopic-assisted uni-portal spinal surgery, unilateral biportal endoscopic surgery, and percutaneous interlaminar lumbar discectomy: a six-month follow-up.关节镜辅助单通道脊柱手术、单侧双通道内镜手术和经皮椎间孔腰椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎管狭窄症患者的短期临床疗效及肌肉损伤比较:六个月随访
J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Jul 21;20(1):684. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-06088-1.
9
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
10
Minimally invasive discectomy versus microdiscectomy/open discectomy for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation.微创椎间盘切除术与显微椎间盘切除术/开放椎间盘切除术治疗有症状的腰椎间盘突出症的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 4;2014(9):CD010328. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010328.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the Status and Promising Potential of Robotic Spinal Surgery Systems.评估机器人脊柱手术系统的现状和发展潜力。
Orthop Surg. 2024 Nov;16(11):2620-2632. doi: 10.1111/os.14244. Epub 2024 Sep 19.
2
Robot-Assisted Spine Surgery: The Pearls and Pitfalls.机器人辅助脊柱手术:要点与陷阱
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2025 Jan 15;33(2):e81-e92. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00692. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
3
Comparison of robotic or computer-assisted navigation versus fluoroscopic freehand techniques in the accuracy of posterior cervical screw placement during cervical spine surgery: a meta-analysis.
机器人或计算机辅助导航与透视徒手技术在后路颈椎螺钉置钉术中准确性的比较:一项荟萃分析。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2024 Sep 6;41(6):746-756. doi: 10.3171/2024.5.SPINE24207. Print 2024 Dec 1.
4
The Impact of Navigation in Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Study of Historical Aspects, Current Techniques and Future Directions.导航技术在腰椎手术中的影响:历史回顾、当前技术及未来发展方向研究
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 8;13(16):4663. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164663.
5
Enhancing Precision and Safety in Spinal Surgery: A Comprehensive Review of Robotic Assistance Technologies.提高脊柱手术的精准度和安全性:机器人辅助技术的全面综述
World Neurosurg. 2024 Nov;191:109-116. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.08.051. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
6
Robotic Spine Surgery: Systematic Review of Common Error Types and Best Practices.机器人脊柱手术:常见错误类型与最佳实践的系统评价
Oper Neurosurg. 2025 Mar 1;28(3):295-302. doi: 10.1227/ons.0000000000001293. Epub 2024 Jul 22.
7
Minimally Invasive versus Traditional Surgery: Efficacy of PELD and PLIF in Treating Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis.微创与传统手术:PELD 和 PLIF 治疗化脓性椎间盘炎的疗效比较。
Med Sci Monit. 2024 Jul 19;30:e943176. doi: 10.12659/MSM.943176.
8
Navigation-Guided/Robot-Assisted Spinal Surgery: A Review Article.导航引导/机器人辅助脊柱手术:一篇综述文章。
Neurospine. 2024 Mar;21(1):8-17. doi: 10.14245/ns.2347184.592. Epub 2024 Mar 31.
9
Research Trends of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy in the Treatment of Lumbar Disc Herniation Over the Past Decade: A Bibliometric Analysis.过去十年经皮内镜下腰椎间盘切除术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的研究趋势:一项文献计量分析
J Pain Res. 2023 Oct 4;16:3391-3404. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S421837. eCollection 2023.
10
Clinical outcome of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression in treatment of elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a matched retrospective study.经皮内窥镜腰椎减压术治疗老年腰椎管狭窄症的临床疗效:一项匹配的回顾性研究。
Int Orthop. 2024 Jan;48(1):201-209. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-05947-y. Epub 2023 Aug 26.