Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, 5 JingYuan Road, Shijingshan District, Beijing, 100043, China.
Int Orthop. 2024 Jan;48(1):201-209. doi: 10.1007/s00264-023-05947-y. Epub 2023 Aug 26.
This retrospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar decompression (PELD) in elderly patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).
A matched retrospective study.
The research was conducted in Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, China.
This study included patients treated with PELD for LSS from September 2016 to September 2020. Patients with LSS aged ≥ 80 years were screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria as the study group, and then the same number of patients with LSS aged 50-80 years were matched according to gender, stenosis type, and surgical segment as the control group. Preoperative patient status was assessed using the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification score. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores, modified Macnab criteria, radiological parameters and complication rates.
A total of 624 LSS patients met the screening criteria between September 2016 and September 2020, with 47 LSS patients ≥ 80 years old serving as the study group. Forty-seven LSS patients aged 50-80 years were matched to the study group according to gender, stenosis type, and stenosis segment. The CCI score (1.77 ± 1.67) and ASA classification (2.62 ± 0.74) of the study group were significantly higher than the CCI score (0.66 ± 0.96) and ASA classification (1.28 ± 0.54) of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant. Compared with preoperative data, postoperative ODI, leg pain VAS scores and back pain VAS scores were significantly improved in both groups (p < 0.05). However, no significant difference was found between two groups in preoperative and postoperative ODI, leg pain VAS scores and back pain VAS scores (p > 0.05). The operation time and postoperative hospital stay in control group were significantly lower than those in study (p < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in blood loss between the two groups (p > 0.05). Besides, overall radiological parameters were comparable in elder and younger patients (p > 0.05), and disc height (DH), lumbar lordosis and segmental lordosis decreased after two year follow-up in both groups (p < 0.05). In addition, complication rates were similar between the two groups (p > 0.05), and no serious complications and deaths were found.
Single-centre retrospective design, non-randomized sample, small sample size.
Although elderly LSS patients (≥ 80 years old) are less fit and have more comorbidities, satisfactory outcomes can be achieved with PELD, comparable to those of LSS patients < 80 years old, and without increased complications.
本回顾性队列研究旨在评估经皮内镜腰椎减压术(PELD)治疗老年腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)患者的疗效和安全性。
匹配的回顾性研究。
研究在北京朝阳医院、首都医科大学进行。
本研究纳入了 2016 年 9 月至 2020 年 9 月期间因 LSS 接受 PELD 治疗的患者。根据纳入和排除标准,筛选出年龄≥80 岁的 LSS 患者作为研究组,然后根据性别、狭窄类型和手术节段,匹配相同数量的年龄 50-80 岁的 LSS 患者作为对照组。术前患者状况采用 Charlson 合并症指数(CCI)和美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况评分进行评估。临床结果采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)、Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI)评分、改良 Macnab 标准、影像学参数和并发症发生率进行评估。
2016 年 9 月至 2020 年 9 月期间,共有 624 例 LSS 患者符合筛选标准,其中 47 例 LSS 患者年龄≥80 岁,作为研究组。根据性别、狭窄类型和狭窄节段,将 47 例年龄 50-80 岁的 LSS 患者与研究组相匹配。研究组的 CCI 评分(1.77±1.67)和 ASA 分级(2.62±0.74)明显高于对照组的 CCI 评分(0.66±0.96)和 ASA 分级(1.28±0.54),差异有统计学意义。与术前数据相比,两组术后 ODI、腿痛 VAS 评分和腰痛 VAS 评分均明显改善(p<0.05)。然而,两组间术前和术后 ODI、腿痛 VAS 评分和腰痛 VAS 评分差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。对照组的手术时间和术后住院时间明显低于研究组(p<0.05),但两组间出血量差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。此外,两组患者的总体影像学参数相似(p>0.05),且两组患者术后 2 年随访时椎间盘高度(DH)、腰椎前凸和节段前凸均有下降(p<0.05)。此外,两组间并发症发生率相似(p>0.05),均未发生严重并发症和死亡。
单中心回顾性设计、非随机样本、样本量小。
尽管老年 LSS 患者(≥80 岁)身体状况较差,合并症较多,但 PELD 治疗可获得满意的疗效,与 LSS 患者<80 岁相似,且并发症发生率无增加。