Williams Chelsea Derlan, Moreno Oswaldo, Hood Kristina B, Santana Arlenis, Johnson Kaprea F, Kuo Sally I-Chun, Garcia-Rodriguez Isis, Mushunje Rumbidzai, Elias Maria J, Vassileva Jasmin, Dick Danielle M, Amstadter Ananda B, Bravo Diamond Y
Virginia Commonwealth University.
Ohio State University.
J Divers High Educ. 2025 Sep;18(Suppl 1):S100-S110. doi: 10.1037/dhe0000548. Epub 2024 Jan 22.
First-generation and ethnic-racial minoritized college students experience greater academic disparities, but limited work has focused on intersectional experiences underlying academic achievement in higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic over time. The current longitudinal study examined the associations between various forms of well-being (i.e., emotional, psychological, and social) at T1 (Time 1; acute pandemic) predicting academic achievement (GPA) at T2 (ongoing pandemic), while accounting for T1 GPA. We also examined whether academic stress disrupted the association between T1 well-being and T2 GPA. We tested differences between first-generation college students of color, continuing (i.e., students who are not first-generation college students) college students of color, first-generation college white students, and continuing college white students ( = 880). Consistent with expectations, results indicated that the associations varied based on the intersection of ethnic-racial background and college student generational status. Among first-generation college students of color and continuing college students of color, psychological well-being at T1 predicted higher GPA at T2 but only when academic stress was low (high academic stress disrupted this association and it became non-significant). Among continuing students of color, T1 emotional well-being predicted greater T2 GPA. Inconsistent with expectations, among continuing white students, T1 social well-being was associated with lower T2 academic achievement. Overall, findings indicate that examining the intersectionality of identities provides an important, nuanced understanding of students' academic achievement and how academic stress impedes positive processes over time.
第一代大学生和少数族裔大学生经历了更大的学业差距,但在新冠疫情期间,随着时间推移,关注高等教育中学术成就背后交叉经历的研究有限。当前的纵向研究考察了在T1(时间1;疫情急性期)时各种形式的幸福感(即情绪、心理和社会幸福感)与T2(疫情持续期)时学术成就(GPA)之间的关联,同时考虑了T1时的GPA。我们还考察了学业压力是否会破坏T1时的幸福感与T2时的GPA之间的关联。我们测试了有色人种第一代大学生、非第一代有色人种大学生、第一代白人大学生和非第一代白人大学生(n = 880)之间的差异。与预期一致,结果表明这些关联因种族背景和大学生代际身份的交叉而有所不同。在有色人种第一代大学生和非第一代有色人种大学生中,T1时的心理健康状况能预测T2时更高的GPA,但前提是学业压力较低(高学业压力会破坏这种关联,使其变得不显著)。在非第一代有色人种大学生中,T1时的情绪幸福感能预测T2时更高的GPA。与预期不符的是,在非第一代白人大学生中,T1时的社会幸福感与T2时较低的学术成就相关。总体而言,研究结果表明,考察身份的交叉性能够为学生的学术成就以及学业压力如何随着时间阻碍积极进程提供重要的、细致入微的理解。