Zhang Qiang, Lian Diandong, Zhang Yiqiao
College of Physical Education, Suzhou University, Suzhou, Anhui, China.
Department of Physical Education, Tarim University, Alar, Xinjiang, China.
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 14;16:1640081. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1640081. eCollection 2025.
An analysis was conducted on the impact of the body on athletes' emotions and motivation from the perspective of Public Health (PH).
PSO-KNN (Particle Swarm Optimization-K-Nearest Neighbor) algorithm and PSO-SVM algorithm (Particle Swarm Optimization-Support Vector Machine) were obtained by combining Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), and Support Vector Machine (SVM), and then the recognition rates of the two algorithms were compared.
When comparing the PSO-KNN algorithm and PSO-SVM algorithm on baseline removed and baseline not removed, the average recognition rates of PSO-KNN algorithm and PSO-SVM algorithm under emotional state were 56.66 and 54.75%, respectively. The average recognition rates of PSO-KNN algorithm and PSO-SVM algorithm with baseline removal under tension were 53.16 and 50.58%, respectively.
The algorithm that removes the baseline is better than the algorithm that does not remove the baseline, and the PSO-KNN algorithm is better than the PSO-SVM algorithm.
从公共卫生(PH)角度分析身体对运动员情绪和动机的影响。
通过结合粒子群优化算法(PSO)、K近邻算法(KNN)和支持向量机算法(SVM)得到粒子群优化 - K近邻算法(PSO - KNN)和粒子群优化 - 支持向量机算法(PSO - SVM),然后比较这两种算法的识别率。
在去除基线和未去除基线的情况下比较PSO - KNN算法和PSO - SVM算法,情绪状态下PSO - KNN算法和PSO - SVM算法的平均识别率分别为56.66%和54.75%。去除基线情况下紧张状态下PSO - KNN算法和PSO - SVM算法的平均识别率分别为53.16%和50.58%。
去除基线的算法优于未去除基线的算法,且PSO - KNN算法优于PSO - SVM算法。