Suppr超能文献

暴力风险评估方法进展综述。

A review of progress in violence risk assessment methods.

作者信息

Ling Xindi, Li Haozhe, Li Wen, Wang Shujian, Zhang Qinting, Cai Weixiong

机构信息

Shanghai Key Lab of Forensic Medicine, Key Lab of Forensic Science, Ministry of Justice, Shanghai Forensic Service Platform, Academy of Forensic Science, Shanghai, China.

Department of Forensic Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Forensic Sci Res. 2025 Jun 28;10(3):owaf014. doi: 10.1093/fsr/owaf014. eCollection 2025 Sep.

Abstract

Violence often occurs among patients with mental disorders. The risk of violence is assessed under the demand of psychiatric clinical treatment or forensic assessment. Corresponding therapeutic intervention strategies could be developed according to the outcome of the assessment. Currently, violence risk assessment methods are mainly divided into actuarial assessment and structured professional judgement. Scientific and objective assessment results support judicial decisions and risk management. However, all the assessment methods have certain shortcomings, and there is still room for improvement. This paper reviews several tools of violence risk assessment and their research progress, focusing on the main content of each tool and its applicability. The review aimed to provide a reference for the selection and application of violence risk assessment tools and optimization of violence risk assessment methods in the future.  The violence risk assessment methods are widely used in psychiatric clinical treatment or forensic assessment, but all the methods have certain shortcomings.The review discussed main contents and research progress of several violence risk assessment tools in order to explore applicability of each tool.The review aimed to provide a reference for the selection and application of violence risk assessment tools and optimization of violence risk assessment methods in the future.

摘要

暴力行为常发生于精神障碍患者之中。暴力风险在精神科临床治疗需求或法医评估要求下进行评估。可根据评估结果制定相应的治疗干预策略。目前,暴力风险评估方法主要分为精算评估和结构化专业判断。科学客观的评估结果有助于司法决策和风险管理。然而,所有评估方法都存在一定缺陷,仍有改进空间。本文综述了几种暴力风险评估工具及其研究进展,重点介绍了每种工具的主要内容及其适用性。该综述旨在为未来暴力风险评估工具的选择与应用以及暴力风险评估方法的优化提供参考。暴力风险评估方法在精神科临床治疗或法医评估中广泛应用,但所有方法都有一定缺陷。该综述探讨了几种暴力风险评估工具的主要内容和研究进展,以探究每种工具的适用性。该综述旨在为未来暴力风险评估工具的选择与应用以及暴力风险评估方法的优化提供参考。

相似文献

1
A review of progress in violence risk assessment methods.
Forensic Sci Res. 2025 Jun 28;10(3):owaf014. doi: 10.1093/fsr/owaf014. eCollection 2025 Sep.
4
Risk assessment for aggressive behaviour in schizophrenia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 2;5(5):CD012397. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012397.pub2.
5
Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;2014(4):CD007768. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007768.pub3.
6
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
10
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Linear Sequential Unmasking- (LSU-): A general approach for improving decision making as well as minimizing noise and bias.
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2021 Aug 13;3:100161. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100161. eCollection 2021.
3
Validation and further development of a risk assessment instrument for child welfare.
Child Abuse Negl. 2021 Jul;117:105047. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105047. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
4
Violent and non-violent offending in patients with schizophrenia: Exploring influences and differences via machine learning.
Compr Psychiatry. 2021 May;107:152238. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2021.152238. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
6
Cognitive and Human Factors in Expert Decision Making: Six Fallacies and the Eight Sources of Bias.
Anal Chem. 2020 Jun 16;92(12):7998-8004. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00704. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
7
ISO Standards Addressing Issues of Bias and Impartiality in Forensic Work.
J Forensic Sci. 2020 May;65(3):800-808. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14265. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
9
Assessing Dynamic Violence Risk in a High-Risk Treated Sample of Violent Offenders.
Assessment. 2020 Dec;27(8):1886-1900. doi: 10.1177/1073191118797440. Epub 2018 Sep 2.
10
Use of risk assessment instruments to predict violence in forensic psychiatric hospitals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Eur Psychiatry. 2018 Aug;52:47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.02.007. Epub 2018 Apr 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验