• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

暴力风险评估方法进展综述。

A review of progress in violence risk assessment methods.

作者信息

Ling Xindi, Li Haozhe, Li Wen, Wang Shujian, Zhang Qinting, Cai Weixiong

机构信息

Shanghai Key Lab of Forensic Medicine, Key Lab of Forensic Science, Ministry of Justice, Shanghai Forensic Service Platform, Academy of Forensic Science, Shanghai, China.

Department of Forensic Medicine, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

Forensic Sci Res. 2025 Jun 28;10(3):owaf014. doi: 10.1093/fsr/owaf014. eCollection 2025 Sep.

DOI:10.1093/fsr/owaf014
PMID:40894242
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12396626/
Abstract

Violence often occurs among patients with mental disorders. The risk of violence is assessed under the demand of psychiatric clinical treatment or forensic assessment. Corresponding therapeutic intervention strategies could be developed according to the outcome of the assessment. Currently, violence risk assessment methods are mainly divided into actuarial assessment and structured professional judgement. Scientific and objective assessment results support judicial decisions and risk management. However, all the assessment methods have certain shortcomings, and there is still room for improvement. This paper reviews several tools of violence risk assessment and their research progress, focusing on the main content of each tool and its applicability. The review aimed to provide a reference for the selection and application of violence risk assessment tools and optimization of violence risk assessment methods in the future.  The violence risk assessment methods are widely used in psychiatric clinical treatment or forensic assessment, but all the methods have certain shortcomings.The review discussed main contents and research progress of several violence risk assessment tools in order to explore applicability of each tool.The review aimed to provide a reference for the selection and application of violence risk assessment tools and optimization of violence risk assessment methods in the future.

摘要

暴力行为常发生于精神障碍患者之中。暴力风险在精神科临床治疗需求或法医评估要求下进行评估。可根据评估结果制定相应的治疗干预策略。目前,暴力风险评估方法主要分为精算评估和结构化专业判断。科学客观的评估结果有助于司法决策和风险管理。然而,所有评估方法都存在一定缺陷,仍有改进空间。本文综述了几种暴力风险评估工具及其研究进展,重点介绍了每种工具的主要内容及其适用性。该综述旨在为未来暴力风险评估工具的选择与应用以及暴力风险评估方法的优化提供参考。暴力风险评估方法在精神科临床治疗或法医评估中广泛应用,但所有方法都有一定缺陷。该综述探讨了几种暴力风险评估工具的主要内容和研究进展,以探究每种工具的适用性。该综述旨在为未来暴力风险评估工具的选择与应用以及暴力风险评估方法的优化提供参考。

相似文献

1
A review of progress in violence risk assessment methods.暴力风险评估方法进展综述。
Forensic Sci Res. 2025 Jun 28;10(3):owaf014. doi: 10.1093/fsr/owaf014. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
4
Risk assessment for aggressive behaviour in schizophrenia.精神分裂症攻击行为的风险评估
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 2;5(5):CD012397. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012397.pub2.
5
Interventions to improve safe and effective medicines use by consumers: an overview of systematic reviews.改善消费者安全有效用药的干预措施:系统评价概述
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 29;2014(4):CD007768. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007768.pub3.
6
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
7
Aspects of Genetic Diversity, Host Specificity and Public Health Significance of Single-Celled Intestinal Parasites Commonly Observed in Humans and Mostly Referred to as 'Non-Pathogenic'.人类常见且大多被称为“非致病性”的单细胞肠道寄生虫的遗传多样性、宿主特异性及公共卫生意义
APMIS. 2025 Sep;133(9):e70036. doi: 10.1111/apm.70036.
8
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
9
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.
10
Interventions for interpersonal communication about end of life care between health practitioners and affected people.干预健康从业者与受影响者之间关于临终关怀的人际沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 8;7(7):CD013116. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013116.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Linear Sequential Unmasking- (LSU-): A general approach for improving decision making as well as minimizing noise and bias.线性顺序解蔽法(LSU):一种用于改善决策以及将噪声和偏差降至最低的通用方法。
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2021 Aug 13;3:100161. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100161. eCollection 2021.
2
Personality Disorder Traits, Rorschach Performance, and Neuropsychological Functioning in the Case of a Serial Killer: The Importance of a Multilevel Approach in the Assessment of Personalities Associated with Extreme and Repetitive Violence.人格障碍特征、罗夏墨迹测验表现与系列杀手的神经心理学功能:在评估与极端和重复暴力相关的人格时采用多层次方法的重要性。
J Pers Assess. 2022 Jul-Aug;104(4):559-571. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2021.1942023. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
3
Validation and further development of a risk assessment instrument for child welfare.儿童福利风险评估工具的验证和进一步开发。
Child Abuse Negl. 2021 Jul;117:105047. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105047. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
4
Violent and non-violent offending in patients with schizophrenia: Exploring influences and differences via machine learning.精神分裂症患者的暴力和非暴力犯罪:通过机器学习探索影响和差异。
Compr Psychiatry. 2021 May;107:152238. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2021.152238. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
5
Profiling the differences of gut microbial structure between schizophrenia patients with and without violent behaviors based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing.基于 16S rRNA 基因测序的精神分裂症患者有无暴力行为肠道微生物结构差异分析。
Int J Legal Med. 2021 Jan;135(1):131-141. doi: 10.1007/s00414-020-02439-1. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
6
Cognitive and Human Factors in Expert Decision Making: Six Fallacies and the Eight Sources of Bias.专家决策中的认知和人为因素:六个谬论和八个偏见来源。
Anal Chem. 2020 Jun 16;92(12):7998-8004. doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00704. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
7
ISO Standards Addressing Issues of Bias and Impartiality in Forensic Work.解决法医工作中偏见和公正性问题的国际标准化组织标准。
J Forensic Sci. 2020 May;65(3):800-808. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.14265. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
8
Cross-Validation of the Revised Version of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG-R) in a Sample of Individuals Convicted of Sexual Offenses.修订版暴力风险评估指南(VRAG-R)在性犯罪定罪个体样本中的验证。
Sex Abuse. 2021 Feb;33(1):63-87. doi: 10.1177/1079063219841901. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
9
Assessing Dynamic Violence Risk in a High-Risk Treated Sample of Violent Offenders.评估暴力罪犯高风险治疗样本中的动态暴力风险。
Assessment. 2020 Dec;27(8):1886-1900. doi: 10.1177/1073191118797440. Epub 2018 Sep 2.
10
Use of risk assessment instruments to predict violence in forensic psychiatric hospitals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.使用风险评估工具预测法医精神病院的暴力行为:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Psychiatry. 2018 Aug;52:47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.02.007. Epub 2018 Apr 4.