Cardiovascular Prehabilitation in Patients Awaiting Heart Transplantation- Addressing Clinical Needs (the PREHAB HTx Study).

作者信息

Reed Jennifer L, Tulloch Heather E, Ross Heather, Terada Tasuku, Mistura Matheus, Marçal Isabela Roque, Oh Paul, Chih Sharon

机构信息

University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

School of Human Kinetics, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

CJC Open. 2025 May 22;7(8):1110-1119. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2025.05.009. eCollection 2025 Aug.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To compare the effects of a 12-week prehabilitation (PREHAB) program vs usual care (UC) on functional capacity in adults listed for heart transplantation. Secondary aims included comparing peak oxygen uptake ( Opeak), frailty, physical activity, mental health, cognitive function, quality of life (QoL), and dietary habits.

METHODS

A multicentre randomized controlled trial was conducted. Participants were randomized to PREHAB or UC. The 12-week PREHAB program included twice weekly high-intensity interval training sessions on an upright cycle ergometer, a stress management course, and a nutrition workshop. The primary outcome was functional capacity (6-minute walk test distance) from baseline to 12 weeks of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included changes in Opeak, frailty, physical activity, severity of anxiety, depression, and stress, cognitive function, QoL, and dietary habits.

RESULTS

Trial recruitment began in October 2018 and closed, due to the COVID-19 pandemic, in October 2020. Of 84 patients screened, 17 were recruited (age: 44 ± 9 years, 71% male), and 4 were randomized (PREHAB = 2; UC = 2). Both patients completed PREHAB, and 1 patient completed UC. Reasons for dropout throughout the trial included the following: receiving a transplant; medication and device contraindications; commitment and travel constraints; and lack of interest. PREHAB showed potential for improvements in the 6-minute walk test distance (Baseline [B]: 343 ± 120; follow-up [FU]: 465 m), Opeak (B: 14.9 ± 0.1; FU: 15.8 ± 0.4 mL/kg/min), and QoL measured using the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (B: 41 ± 33; FU: 26 ± 1 points).

CONCLUSIONS

Recruitment for and completion of PREHAB for patients listed for heart transplantation proved challenging. Given wait-time limitations, future research should examine alternative PREHAB programming, offered sooner following listing, that addresses reported barriers to participation.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02957955.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6c97/12399121/026192288314/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索