Padwal Meghana, Takale Lalna, Phadke Asmita, Gawade Maindad Gayatri, Karmarkar Mandar, Pokale Aarati B
Biochemistry, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Medical College, Pune, IND.
Physiology, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Medical College, Pune, IND.
Cureus. 2025 Jul 29;17(7):e88982. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88982. eCollection 2025 Jul.
Self-directed learning (SDL) is a process in which the learner takes initiative, defines learning objectives, and achieves the learning outcome. One of the roles of an Indian medical graduate (IMG) as per the competency-based medical education (CBME) curriculum, is to become a lifelong learner, which can be achieved by SDL. The strategies used for the implementation of SDL may be facilitated, in which the faculty facilitates learning, and self-paced SDL is without a facilitator. The studies using either one of these strategies have been done so far. Hence, this study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of both strategies and evaluate their impact on learning outcomes.
To compare the effectiveness of facilitated and self-paced learning as two strategies of SDL. Materials and methods: A prospective, interventional study was conducted in the Department of Biochemistry and included 119 students in the first year of MBBS in a medical college attached to a tertiary care teaching hospital in Pune. The department faculty were sensitized about SDL, and the topic for SDL was finalized. The first session of SDL was sensitizing the students about SDL and conducting a validated multiple-choice question-based pre-test on the topic of enzyme inhibition and clinical enzymology. The students were divided into four batches by convenience sampling, out of which two batches were allotted to the facilitated SDL group and two batches to the self-paced SDL group. There was a 14-day intersession period during which learning resources were shared and discussions were conducted in the facilitated group. In the second session following this period, a post-test was conducted, and a debriefing was done to cover the learning gap. Feedback using an online form was taken from both students and faculty.
There was improvement in marks obtained in pre- and post-tests in both facilitated (21.27 and 52.55) and self-paced (21.07 and 45.36) SDL groups, which was statistically significant (p<0.001). There was a difference in the post-test marks of the facilitated (52.55) and self-paced groups (45.36), which was statistically significant (p<0.001). Conclusion: The lifelong learning skill can be fostered by incorporating SDL in their curriculum. The SDL module needs to be carefully chosen and designed as per training needs, resources available, and learners' profiles. The CBME biochemistry curriculum has a lot of scope for covering some part of the syllabus by SDL, and also includes core competencies in the future. SDL can be undertaken using facilitated and self-paced strategies, which promote self-motivation, accountability, and critical thinking to achieve learning objectives. Thus, methodical SDL conducted using these strategies will pave the way for students to be lifelong learners by incorporating it into their curriculum.
自主学习(SDL)是一个学习者主动采取行动、确定学习目标并实现学习成果的过程。根据基于能力的医学教育(CBME)课程,印度医学毕业生(IMG)的角色之一是成为终身学习者,而这可以通过自主学习来实现。实施自主学习所采用的策略可以是有引导的,即教师促进学习,也可以是自定进度的自主学习,即没有教师引导。到目前为止,已经有研究分别采用了这两种策略中的一种。因此,本研究旨在比较这两种策略的有效性,并评估它们对学习成果的影响。
比较有引导的自主学习和自定进度的自主学习这两种自主学习策略的有效性。
在生物化学系进行了一项前瞻性干预研究,纳入了浦那一家三级护理教学医院附属医学院的119名医学学士一年级学生。该系教师对自主学习有了更深入的了解,并确定了自主学习的主题。自主学习的第一节课是让学生了解自主学习,并就酶抑制和临床酶学主题进行一次经过验证的基于多项选择题的预测试。通过便利抽样将学生分为四组,其中两组被分配到有引导的自主学习组,两组被分配到自定进度的自主学习组。在这期间有14天的课间休息时间,在此期间,有引导的小组共享学习资源并进行讨论。在此期间后的第二节课上,进行了后测试,并进行了总结汇报以弥补学习差距。通过在线表格从学生和教师那里获取反馈。
在有引导的自主学习组(21.27和52.55)和自定进度的自主学习组(21.07和45.36)中,预测试和后测试的成绩都有提高,差异具有统计学意义(p<0.001)。有引导的自主学习组(52.55)和自定进度的自主学习组(45.36)的后测试成绩存在差异,具有统计学意义(p<0.001)。
通过将自主学习纳入课程可以培养终身学习技能。自主学习模块需要根据培训需求、可用资源和学习者情况进行精心选择和设计。CBME生物化学课程有很大的空间通过自主学习涵盖部分教学大纲内容,并且在未来还包括核心能力。自主学习可以采用有引导的和自定进度的策略来进行,这些策略能够促进自我激励、责任感和批判性思维以实现学习目标。因此,使用这些策略进行有条理的自主学习将为学生通过将其纳入课程成为终身学习者铺平道路。