Suppr超能文献

急性生理与慢性健康评估(APACHE II)、简化急性生理学评分(SAPS III)及序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分在医疗中级护理病房的表现

Performance of Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II), Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS III), and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Scores in a Medical Intermediate Care Unit.

作者信息

Ferreira Pedro N, Duarte Joana A, Fustiga João, Anastácio Marta

机构信息

Internal Medicine Department, São Francisco Xavier Hospital, Lisbon, PRT.

Physiopathology, Faculdade de Medicina Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, PRT.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 Jul 29;17(7):e89010. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89010. eCollection 2025 Jul.

Abstract

METHODS

A retrospective observational study was conducted at the intermediate medical care unit (IMCU) in São Francisco Xavier Hospital, a Portuguese hospital, in the period from January to December 2019. Patients with incomplete records or IMCU stays shorter than 24 hours were excluded. Scores were calculated using MDCalc, and statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 27.

RESULTS

Of the 211 patients included in this analysis, 14.69% (n=31) died, with 16.1% (n=5) of these deaths occurring in the IMCU. The average age of non-survivors was significantly higher at 76.26 years (p < 0.001). Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) and Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS III) scores demonstrated good discrimination, with AUCs of 0.79 and 0.83, respectively, but both scores tended to overestimate mortality. Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) showed the lowest discrimination performance with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.74.

CONCLUSION

APACHE II and SAPS III provided good mortality prediction in the IMCU, with SAPS III showing the highest AUC. However, both scores overestimated mortality, indicating the need for calibration for IMCUs. The SOFA score was less effective due to its focus on organ failure. Further research is needed to adapt these models or develop new ones tailored specifically for IMCUs to improve predictive accuracy and clinical utility.

摘要

方法

在葡萄牙圣弗朗西斯科·泽维尔医院的中级医疗护理单元(IMCU)进行了一项回顾性观察研究,研究时间段为2019年1月至12月。排除记录不完整或在IMCU住院时间短于24小时的患者。使用MDCalc计算评分,并使用SPSS 27版进行统计分析。

结果

在纳入本分析的211例患者中,14.69%(n = 31)死亡,其中16.1%(n = 5)的死亡发生在IMCU。非幸存者的平均年龄显著更高,为76.26岁(p < 0.001)。急性生理与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE II)和简化急性生理学评分(SAPS III)显示出良好的区分能力,曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.79和0.83,但两个评分均倾向于高估死亡率。序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)的区分性能最低,曲线下面积(AUC)为0.74。

结论

APACHE II和SAPS III在IMCU中提供了良好的死亡率预测,SAPS III的AUC最高。然而,两个评分均高估了死亡率,表明IMCU需要进行校准。SOFA评分由于侧重于器官衰竭而效果较差。需要进一步研究来调整这些模型或开发专门针对IMCU的新模型,以提高预测准确性和临床实用性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f1be/12393912/b7b3e62b2d34/cureus-0017-00000089010-i01.jpg

相似文献

2
Evaluation of SOFA-based models for predicting mortality in the ICU: A systematic review.
Crit Care. 2008;12(6):R161. doi: 10.1186/cc7160. Epub 2008 Dec 17.
3
[Clinical study on the effect of glycosaminoglycans on vascular endothelial glycocalyx in sepsis].
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2025 Jun;37(6):527-534. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240725-00634.
6
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
8
[Predictive value of norepinephrine equivalence score on the 28-day death risk in patients with sepsis: a retrospective cohort study].
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2025 Apr;37(4):331-336. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20240413-00341.
9
Clinical complexity of an Italian cardiovascular intensive care unit: the role of mortality and severity risk scores.
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2024 Jul 1;25(7):511-518. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001632. Epub 2024 May 14.
10
Predictive value of mNUTRIC score for chronic critical illness in patients of sepsis complicated with ARDS.
Technol Health Care. 2025 Mar;33(2):831-837. doi: 10.1177/09287329241296430. Epub 2024 Nov 15.

本文引用的文献

2
Performance of Critical Care Outcome Prediction Models in an Intermediate Care Unit.
J Intensive Care Med. 2020 Dec;35(12):1529-1535. doi: 10.1177/0885066619882675. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
4
Performance of Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 In Predicting Hospital Mortality In Emergency Intensive Care Unit.
Chin Med J (Engl). 2017 Jul 5;130(13):1544-1551. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.208250.
6
Design and Performance of a New Severity Score for Intermediate Care.
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 29;10(6):e0130989. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130989. eCollection 2015.
7
Designing optimal mortality risk prediction scores that preserve clinical knowledge.
J Biomed Inform. 2015 Aug;56:145-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2015.05.021. Epub 2015 Jun 6.
8
Performance of SAPS II and SAPS 3 in intermediate care.
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 9;8(10):e77229. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0077229. eCollection 2013.
9
Clinical review: scoring systems in the critically ill.
Crit Care. 2010;14(2):207. doi: 10.1186/cc8204. Epub 2010 Mar 26.
10
External validation of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) 3 in a cohort of 28,357 patients from 147 Italian intensive care units.
Intensive Care Med. 2009 Nov;35(11):1916-24. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1615-0. Epub 2009 Aug 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验