Sutherland Daniel L, Taylor Emma L, Gray Kylie M, Hastings Richard P, Allard Amanda, Carr Joanna, Griffin Joanna, McMeekin Nicola, Randell Elizabeth, Russell Daisy, Willoughby-Richards Bronwen, Wolstencroft Jeanne, Thompson Paul A
Centre for Research in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (CIDD), University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Intellectual Disabilities Research Institute (IDRIS), School of Social Policy and Society, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Aug 15;16:1612911. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1612911. eCollection 2025.
Evaluating the effectiveness of interventions relies on understanding what change in a main outcome is sufficient to be considered meaningful. Our aim was to estimate a Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID) for the Developmental Behaviour Checklist, parent-report (DBC-P)- a measure of behavioural and emotional problems in children and adolescents with intellectual disabilities.
We generated distribution-based estimates through meta-analysis of intervention evaluations using the DBC-P as an outcome measure. We also generated anchor-based estimates using case scenarios with 10 parent carers and 21 professionals working with people with intellectual disabilities.
21 studies were included in the meta-analyses and indicated an average DBC total raw score decrease of 3.01 or 4.73 (depending on analytic methods) in randomised controlled trials, and an average decrease of 9.16 points in pre-post designs. Parent carers provided a median MCID estimate of 6 (IQR 4, 7) and professionals provided a median estimate of 8 (IQR 5, 14).
These findings contextualise DBC-P score changes in relation to outcomes from other interventions and parent carer and professional views. Which MCID value to choose depends on what factors are prioritised for an intervention.
评估干预措施的有效性依赖于理解主要结局的何种变化足以被视为有意义。我们的目的是估计发育行为清单家长报告版(DBC-P)的最小临床重要差异(MCID),该清单用于衡量智障儿童和青少年的行为和情绪问题。
我们通过对以DBC-P作为结局指标的干预评估进行荟萃分析,得出基于分布的估计值。我们还使用了由10名家长照顾者和21名从事智障人士工作的专业人员参与的案例场景,得出基于锚定的估计值。
荟萃分析纳入了21项研究,结果表明,在随机对照试验中,DBC总原始得分平均下降3.01或4.73(取决于分析方法),在前瞻性设计中平均下降9.16分。家长照顾者给出的MCID估计中位数为6(四分位间距4, 7),专业人员给出的中位数估计为8(四分位间距5, 14)。
这些发现将DBC-P得分变化与其他干预措施的结局以及家长照顾者和专业人员的观点联系起来。选择哪个MCID值取决于干预措施优先考虑的因素。