Killeffer A T, Fleming J M, Padukone A, Duerr N, Reed K A, Merizalde-Toro J, Marshall K E, Celi J E, Sheldon K S
Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.
Water and Aquatic Resources Research Group, Universidad Regional Amazónica Ikiam, Tena 150158, Ecuador.
Integr Org Biol. 2025 Jul 26;7(1):obaf031. doi: 10.1093/iob/obaf031. eCollection 2025.
Both sexual and male dimorphism are common in nature, yet we have limited understanding of how different developmental pathways and reproductive strategies of morphs shape energetics. To address this gap, we examined metabolic rates of four species of dung beetle (, and ) with both sexual and male dimorphism. In these species, males have horn length dimorphism, including larger-horned ("major") males and smaller-horned ("minor") males. The gene doublesex, , drives both sexual dimorphism and, by mediating nutrition-dependent horn growth in some species, male dimorphism. Because females and minor males share developmental pathways and have greater investment in reproductive organs than major males, we hypothesized energetic costs would be similar and higher in females and minor males compared to major males. To test this hypothesis, we examined metabolic rates of morphs using flow-through respirometry to record CO output. After accounting for body size and activity level, we found that in two species, and , females had higher CO production compared to major males, and in , females also had higher CO production than minor males. We detected no differences between sexes for and . We also found no significant difference in metabolic rates between major and minor males of any species. Our results suggest that, for these species of dung beetles, any energetic tradeoffs due to reproductive strategies occur between females and males, but not between male morphs. The lack of a general trend in metabolic rates suggests energetic costs are decoupled from sex and male morph across dung beetle species, which runs counter to evolutionary explanations for the maintenance of alternative reproductive tactics.
两性异形和雄性二态性在自然界中都很常见,但我们对不同形态的发育途径和繁殖策略如何影响能量学的了解有限。为了填补这一空白,我们研究了四种具有两性异形和雄性二态性的蜣螂( 、 和 )的代谢率。在这些物种中,雄性具有角长二态性,包括角较大的(“主要”)雄性和角较小的(“次要”)雄性。基因doublesex 既驱动两性异形,又通过介导某些物种中营养依赖的角生长来驱动雄性二态性。由于雌性和次要雄性共享发育途径,并且在生殖器官上的投入比主要雄性更大,我们假设雌性和次要雄性的能量成本与主要雄性相比会相似且更高。为了验证这一假设,我们使用流通式呼吸测定法记录二氧化碳输出,以研究不同形态的代谢率。在考虑了体型和活动水平之后,我们发现,在两种蜣螂 和 中,雌性的二氧化碳产生量高于主要雄性,并且在 中,雌性的二氧化碳产生量也高于次要雄性。对于 和 ,我们未检测到两性之间存在差异。我们还发现,任何物种的主要雄性和次要雄性之间的代谢率均无显著差异。我们的结果表明,对于这些蜣螂物种而言,由于繁殖策略导致的任何能量权衡都发生在雌性和雄性之间,而非雄性形态之间。代谢率缺乏普遍趋势表明,能量成本在蜣螂物种中与性别和雄性形态脱钩,这与维持替代繁殖策略的进化解释相悖。