Zhang Zhi-Yong, Wang Xin-Yu, Hou Cong-Cong, Liu Hong-Bin, Lyu Lyu, Chen Mu-Lei, Xu Xiao-Rong, Jiang Feng, Li Long, Li Wei-Ming, Li Kui-Bao, Wang Juan
Heart-center of Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hypertension, Beijing, China.
Department of Cardiology, Chui Yang Liu Hospital, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2025 Jul 28;22(7):656-667. doi: 10.26599/1671-5411.2025.07.001.
Biomarkers-based prediction of long-term risk of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is scarce. We aim to develop a risk score integrating clinical routine information (C) and plasma biomarkers (B) for predicting long-term risk of ACS patients.
We included 2729 ACS patients from the OCEA (Observation of cardiovascular events in ACS patients). The earlier admitted 1910 patients were enrolled as development cohort; and the subsequently admitted 819 subjects were treated as validation cohort. We investigated 10-year risk of cardiovascular (CV) death, myocardial infarction (MI) and all cause death in these patients. Potential variables contributing to risk of clinical events were assessed using Cox regression models and a score was derived using main part of these variables.
During 16,110 person-years of follow-up, there were 238 CV death/MI in the development cohort. The 7 most important predictors including in the final model were NT-proBNP, D-dimer, GDF-15, peripheral artery disease (PAD), Fibrinogen, ST-segment elevated MI (STEMI), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), termed as CB-ACS score. C-index of the score for predication of cardiovascular events was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.76-0.82) in development cohort and 0.77 (95% CI: 0.76-0.78) in the validation cohort (5832 person-years of follow-up), which outperformed GRACE 2.0 and ABC-ACS risk score. The CB-ACS score was also well calibrated in development and validation cohort (Greenwood-Nam-D'Agostino: = 0.70 and = 0.07, respectively).
CB-ACS risk score provides a useful tool for long-term prediction of CV events in patients with ACS. This model outperforms GRACE 2.0 and ABC-ACS ischemic risk score.
基于生物标志物预测急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)长期风险的研究较少。我们旨在开发一种整合临床常规信息(C)和血浆生物标志物(B)的风险评分,以预测ACS患者的长期风险。
我们纳入了来自OCEA(ACS患者心血管事件观察研究)的2729例ACS患者。较早入院的1910例患者作为开发队列;随后入院的819例患者作为验证队列。我们调查了这些患者心血管(CV)死亡、心肌梗死(MI)和全因死亡的10年风险。使用Cox回归模型评估导致临床事件风险的潜在变量,并使用这些变量的主要部分得出一个评分。
在16110人年的随访期间,开发队列中有238例发生CV死亡/MI。最终模型中纳入的7个最重要预测因子为N末端B型利钠肽原(NT-proBNP)、D-二聚体、生长分化因子15(GDF-15)、外周动脉疾病(PAD)、纤维蛋白原、ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)、左心室射血分数(LVEF),称为CB-ACS评分。该评分预测心血管事件的C指数在开发队列中为0.79(95%CI:0.76-0.82),在验证队列(5832人年随访)中为0.77(95%CI:0.76-0.78),优于全球急性冠状动脉事件注册(GRACE)2.0和急性冠状动脉综合征不良结局风险(ABC-ACS)评分。CB-ACS评分在开发队列和验证队列中校准效果也良好(格林伍德-南-达戈斯蒂诺检验:分别为 = 0.70和 = 0.07)。
CB-ACS风险评分为ACS患者CV事件的长期预测提供了一个有用的工具。该模型优于GRACE 2.0和ABC-ACS缺血风险评分。