• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Older adults living with dementia enrolled in similar Medicare Advantage plans compared to those without dementia.与没有痴呆症的老年人相比,患有痴呆症的老年人参加了类似的医疗保险优势计划。
Alzheimers Dement Behav Socioecon Aging. 2025 Jun;1(2). doi: 10.1002/bsa3.70016. Epub 2025 May 5.
2
Outcomes for Dual-Eligible Beneficiaries With Dementia in Special Needs Plans and Other Medicare Advantage Plans.特殊需求计划和其他医疗保险优势计划中患有痴呆症的双重资格受益人的结局。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Feb 3;8(2):e2461219. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.61219.
3
Patient-Reported Characteristics Across Dual-Eligible Medicare Advantage Plan Types.双重资格医疗保险优势计划类型的患者报告特征。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e255791. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.5791.
4
Medicare Plan Switching Among Beneficiaries With and Without a History of Cancer.有癌症病史和无癌症病史的医疗保险受益人之间的医保计划转换
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2513394. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.13394.
5
Medicaid Spending in Coordination-Only Dual-Eligible Special Needs Plans.仅协调的双重资格特殊需求计划中的医疗补助支出。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2455461. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.55461.
6
Enrollment in Dual-Eligible Special Needs Plans and Disenrollment Rates.双重资格特殊需求计划的参保情况及退保率。
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Jul 3;6(7):e251748. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.1748.
7
Coverage Gaps and Contraceptive Use Among Medicare Enrollees With Disabilities.医疗保险参保残疾人群体中的保险覆盖缺口与避孕措施使用情况
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2517718. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.17718.
8
Interventions for preventing falls in older people in care facilities.护理机构中预防老年人跌倒的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Aug 20;8:CD016064. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD016064.
9
Evaluation of Low-Value Services Across Major Medicare Advantage Insurers and Traditional Medicare.评估主要医疗保险优势计划和传统医疗保险中的低价值服务。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Nov 4;7(11):e2442633. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.42633.
10
Perioperative Costs of Elective Surgical Procedures in Medicare Advantage Compared With Traditional Medicare.与传统医疗保险相比,医疗保险优势计划中择期外科手术的围手术期成本。
JAMA Health Forum. 2025 Aug 1;6(8):e252258. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.2258.

本文引用的文献

1
Differences in healthcare utilization between enrollees of fully integrated dual eligible special needs plans versus non-fully integrated plans.完全整合的双重资格特殊需要计划参保人与非完全整合计划参保人之间的医疗利用差异。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Jul;72(7):2027-2037. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18916. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
2
Partner Plan Choices and Medicare Advantage Enrollment Decisions Among Older Adults.老年人的伙伴计划选择与医疗保险优势参保决策
JAMA. 2024 Apr 16;331(15):1322-1325. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.1773.
3
The Predominance of Medicare Advantage.医疗保险优势计划的主导地位
N Engl J Med. 2023 Dec 14;389(24):2291-2298. doi: 10.1056/NEJMhpr2302315.
4
Changes in Care Use and Financial Status Associated With Dementia in Older Adults.老年人痴呆症相关的医疗保健使用和财务状况变化。
JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Dec 1;183(12):1315-1323. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.5482.
5
Medicare Advantage Enrollment and Disenrollment Among Persons With Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias.医疗保险优势计划在阿尔茨海默病及相关痴呆患者中的入组和退组情况。
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Sep 1;4(9):e233080. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.3080.
6
Medicare and Medicaid Dual-Eligible Special Needs Plan Enrollment and Beneficiary-Reported Experiences With Care.医疗保险和医疗补助双重资格特殊需求计划的参保情况及受益人报告的就医体验。
JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Sep 1;4(9):e232957. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.2957.
7
Medicare Switching: Patterns Of Enrollment Growth In Medicare Advantage, 2006-22.医疗保险转换:2006 年至 2022 年医疗保险优势计划中的参保增长模式。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2023 Sep;42(9):1203-1211. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2023.00224.
8
Addressing Serious Illness Care in Medicare Advantage.解决医疗保险优势计划中的重病护理问题。
N Engl J Med. 2023 May 11;388(19):1729-1732. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2302252. Epub 2023 May 6.
9
Risk of Discharge to Lower-Quality Nursing Homes Among Hospitalized Older Adults With Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias.患有阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症的住院老年患者被送往低质量疗养院的风险。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Feb 1;6(2):e2255134. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.55134.
10
Medication Costs and Use of Older Americans in Assisted Living Settings: a Nationally Representative Cross-Sectional Study.《居住在辅助生活环境中的美国老年人的药物费用和使用情况:一项全国代表性的横断面研究》。
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Feb;38(2):294-301. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07434-3. Epub 2022 Feb 7.

与没有痴呆症的老年人相比,患有痴呆症的老年人参加了类似的医疗保险优势计划。

Older adults living with dementia enrolled in similar Medicare Advantage plans compared to those without dementia.

作者信息

Lei Lianlian, Maust Donovan T, Ankuda Claire, Hoffman Geoffrey J, Kim Hyungjin Myra, Strominger Julie, Levy Helen

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

Alzheimers Dement Behav Socioecon Aging. 2025 Jun;1(2). doi: 10.1002/bsa3.70016. Epub 2025 May 5.

DOI:10.1002/bsa3.70016
PMID:40896804
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12391884/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Medicare Advantage (MA) plan selection may differ between older adults with or without dementia in unexplored ways. This study aims to characterize MA plan choice among those with dementia.

METHODS

We used the 2010 to 2018 waves of the Health and Retirement Study with linked Medicare enrollment data to identify MA respondents ≥ 65 years, with and without dementia. Conditional logit models examined how characteristics of MA plans affected choice.

RESULTS

Among respondents overall, there were no differences between those with versus without dementia regarding how plan out-of-pocket cost, star rating, and type affected choice. Among the dual eligible group, those with versus without dementia were more likely to choose Special Needs Plans (difference in log odds: 0.804, = 0.007).

DISCUSSION

There were few differences in how MA plan characteristics affected choice among older adults with and without dementia. Older adults with dementia may make similar MA plan choices as those without.

摘要

引言

医疗保险优势(MA)计划的选择在患有或未患痴呆症的老年人中可能存在未被探索的差异。本研究旨在描述痴呆症患者的MA计划选择情况。

方法

我们使用2010年至2018年的健康与退休研究以及相关的医疗保险参保数据,以识别年龄≥65岁、患有和未患痴呆症的MA受访者。条件logit模型研究了MA计划的特征如何影响选择。

结果

在所有受访者中,患有和未患痴呆症的人在计划自付费用、星级评级和类型如何影响选择方面没有差异。在双重资格组中,患有痴呆症和未患痴呆症的人更有可能选择特殊需求计划(对数优势差异:0.804,P = 0.007)。

讨论

MA计划特征对患有和未患痴呆症的老年人选择的影响几乎没有差异。患有痴呆症的老年人可能会做出与未患痴呆症的老年人类似的MA计划选择。