Song Won Hoon, Kim Tae Un, Ryu Hwa Seong, Yun Mi Sook, Park Sung-Woo
Department of Urology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea.
Department of Urology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea.
Investig Clin Urol. 2025 Sep;66(5):405-415. doi: 10.4111/icu.20250208.
This study evaluated inter-/intra-reader agreement with the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.1 to improve the detection rate of prostate cancer.
We enrolled 210 patients who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for clinically suspected or diagnosed prostate cancer. Four readers, including two urologists, viewed patients' mpMRI and scored PI-RADS between two sessions, including the time for feedback and training after the first reading session. Inter- and intra-reader agreements were evaluated using Fleiss' kappa coefficient (κ), agreement coefficient 1 (AC1), and percentage of agreement (PA).
The overall inter-reader agreement between all readers was moderate (κ=0.466, AC1=0.522, and PA=0.610). The overall inter-reader agreement improved in the second session. The agreement for peripheral zone (PZ) lesions was higher than that for transitional zone (TZ) lesions. At a PI-RADS cut-off of 4, the agreement for PZ lesions was almost perfect (PA=0.888) and higher than that for TZ lesions. The inter-reader agreement for lesions with a PI-RADS ≥4 and Gleason score ≥7 was almost perfect (AC1=0.960 and PA=0.964). The intra-reader agreement for lesions overall and PI-RADS ≥4 lesions were substantial (AC1=0.601) and almost perfect (PA=0.876), respectively.
Readers achieved moderate agreement for PI-RADS version 2.1 and benefitted from training sessions. Feedback, training, and multidisciplinary discussions also improved inter-reader agreement. Our study can provide guidance, updates, and further steps for the standardization and improvement of PI-RADS scoring.
本研究评估了阅片者间及阅片者内对前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)第2.1版的一致性,以提高前列腺癌的检出率。
我们纳入了210例因临床怀疑或诊断为前列腺癌而接受多参数磁共振成像(mpMRI)检查的患者。包括两名泌尿科医生在内的四名阅片者查看患者的mpMRI,并在两个阶段对PI-RADS进行评分,包括第一次阅片后的反馈和培训时间。使用Fleiss卡方系数(κ)、一致性系数1(AC1)和一致性百分比(PA)评估阅片者间及阅片者内的一致性。
所有阅片者之间的总体阅片者间一致性为中等(κ=0.466,AC1=0.522,PA=0.610)。在第二阶段,总体阅片者间一致性有所提高。外周带(PZ)病变的一致性高于移行带(TZ)病变。在PI-RADS临界值为4时,PZ病变的一致性几乎完美(PA=0.888),且高于TZ病变。PI-RADS≥4且Gleason评分≥7的病变的阅片者间一致性几乎完美(AC1=0.960,PA=0.964)。病变总体及PI-RADS≥4病变的阅片者内一致性分别为实质性(AC1=0.601)和几乎完美(PA=0.876)。
阅片者对PI-RADS第2.1版达成了中等程度的一致性,并从培训课程中受益。反馈、培训和多学科讨论也提高了阅片者间的一致性。我们的研究可为PI-RADS评分的标准化和改进提供指导、更新及进一步措施。