Chen Junwu, Huang Feng, Wang Song, Liu Xingchen, Wang Anmin, Zheng Xin
School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beiijing, 100044, China.
Yunnan Provincial Transportation Planning and Design Research Institute Co., Ltd, Kunming, 650041, China.
Sci Rep. 2025 Sep 2;15(1):32324. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-17511-2.
Due to the high construction efficiency and low cost, double-arch tunnels without middle drift has been gradually promoted in engineering in recent years. However, the excavation characteristics of the left and right tunnels are easy to cause structural disturbance and deformation out of control. In particular, the surrounding rock disturbance of the front tunnel caused by the construction of the secondary tunnel often leads to lining cracking and structural instability. Based on the Xinmajie Tunnel project in China, combined with similar model experiments and finite element simulation, the structural mechanical response and failure evolution characteristics during the construction process were systematically studied, and the influence of the excavation of the secondary tunnel on the stress mechanism of the front tunnel was mainly revealed. On this basis, a comparative study was further carried out on the influence of different excavation methods, excavation footage and tunnel face offset parameters about the structural stress. The results show that the deformation of the surrounding rock experiences three stages of "rapid increase‒rapid decrease‒slow increase", and the disturbance of the secondary tunnel makes the maximum settlement of the front tunnel arch crown increase by 25.56%. The axial force and bending moment of the right arch waist lining of the front tunnel are the largest, and the stress concentration phenomenon is prominent, which is the most unfavorable part of the force. During the loading process, the cracks of the lining structure are concentrated in the weak areas such as arch shoulder, arch crown and inverted arch. In addition, the excavation method of the middle partition wall (first left and then right) and the control of small excavation footage are helpful to weaken the disturbance, and alleviate the stress concentration. The 12 m staggered distance of the left and right tunnel faces is the best in controlling the settlement and plastic zone expansion. It is recommended as an important parameter reference for similar tunnel layout.
由于施工效率高、成本低,近年来无中导洞的双连拱隧道在工程中得到了逐步推广。然而,左右隧道的开挖特性容易导致结构扰动和变形失控。特别是二次衬砌隧道施工引起的前方隧道围岩扰动,常导致衬砌开裂和结构失稳。以我国新麻街隧道工程为依托,结合相似模型试验和有限元模拟,系统研究了施工过程中的结构力学响应和破坏演化特征,主要揭示了二次衬砌隧道开挖对前方隧道应力机制的影响。在此基础上,进一步对不同开挖方法、开挖进尺和隧道掌子面错距参数对结构应力的影响进行了对比研究。结果表明,围岩变形经历“快速增加—快速减小—缓慢增加”三个阶段,二次衬砌隧道的扰动使前方隧道拱顶最大沉降增加了25.56%。前方隧道右拱腰衬砌的轴力和弯矩最大,应力集中现象突出,是受力最不利部位。在加载过程中,衬砌结构裂缝集中在拱肩、拱顶和仰拱等薄弱部位。此外,中隔墙开挖方法(先左后右)和小进尺控制有助于减弱扰动,缓解应力集中。左右隧道掌子面错开12 m对控制沉降和塑性区扩展效果最佳,建议作为类似隧道布置的重要参数参考。