• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冷圈套息肉切除术门诊治疗10mm以下无蒂息肉的疗效及安全性

Efficacy and safety of cold snare polypectomy for outpatient treatment of sessile polyps smaller than 10mm.

作者信息

Li Chunmei, Xie Xinyu, Qin Jian, Ding Yufei, Ma Xiaojuan, Liu Shanshan, Chen Miao, Dong Dandan, Sun Jing, Deng Xuedan, Liu Lulu, Cui Hongyan

机构信息

Department of Oncology, The Fourth Division Hospital of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, Yining, China.

Department of Gastroenterology, The Fourth Division Hospital of Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps, Yining, China.

出版信息

BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 Sep 2;25(1):631. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-04245-8.

DOI:10.1186/s12876-025-04245-8
PMID:40898081
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12403342/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Screening colonoscopy plays a critical role in reducing colorectal cancer incidence by identifying and removing polyps. Simple and safe treatment is the most common request of both doctors and patients. Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is increasingly favored for polyps < 10 mm, yet concerns remain regarding residual tissue. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CSP in the outpatient treatment of sessile polyps < 10 mm using endoscopic optical assessment.

METHODS

Patients undergoing outpatient screening colonoscopy who consented to combined polypectomy were recruited, excluding those on anticoagulants or antiplatelets. CSP was performed for detected sessile polyps < 10 mm, and patients did not undergo any additional screening laboratory tests. Postoperative wounds were assessed endoscopically, and resected specimens were stained with crystalline violet for optimum pathological preparation and evaluation. Complete resection was determined separately. Complications and 7-day postoperative outcomes were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 194 sessile colorectal polyps < 10 mm were resected from 77 patients, with a complete resection rate of 91.24% (95% confidence interval: 87.2-95.2%). There was a statistically significant difference in the rate of complete resection by endoscopic optical assessment compared to pathologic assessment (86.60% [168/194] vs. 72.68% [141/194], p < 0.01). Optical assessment was not significantly different from the final total resection rate (86.60% [168/194] vs. 91.24% [177/194], p = 0.15). No adverse events occurred in all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

CSP is a safe and effective technique for outpatient resection of sessile polyps < 10 mm. Optical assessment of postoperative defects provides a viable method for determining complete resection.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trial registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number: ChiCTR2400082461, registration date: 29/3/2024).

摘要

背景

筛查性结肠镜检查通过识别和切除息肉在降低结直肠癌发病率方面发挥着关键作用。简单安全的治疗是医生和患者最普遍的要求。冷圈套息肉切除术(CSP)越来越受青睐用于切除直径小于10mm的息肉,但对于残留组织仍存在担忧。本研究的目的是使用内镜光学评估来评估CSP在门诊治疗直径小于10mm的无蒂息肉的疗效和安全性。

方法

招募接受门诊筛查性结肠镜检查且同意联合息肉切除术的患者,排除正在接受抗凝或抗血小板治疗的患者。对检测到的直径小于10mm的无蒂息肉进行CSP,患者未接受任何额外的筛查实验室检查。术后伤口进行内镜评估,切除标本用结晶紫染色以进行最佳病理制备和评估。分别确定完全切除情况。记录并发症和术后7天的结果。

结果

共从77例患者中切除194枚直径小于10mm的无蒂结直肠息肉,完全切除率为91.24%(95%置信区间:87.2 - 95.2%)。与病理评估相比,内镜光学评估的完全切除率有统计学显著差异(86.60%[168/194]对72.68%[141/194],p < 0.01)。光学评估与最终总切除率无显著差异(86.60%[168/194]对91.24%[177/194],p = 0.15)。所有患者均未发生不良事件。

结论

CSP是门诊切除直径小于10mm的无蒂息肉的一种安全有效的技术。术后缺损的光学评估为确定完全切除提供了一种可行的方法。

试验注册

该试验在中国临床试验注册中心注册(注册号:ChiCTR2400082461,注册日期:2024年3月29日)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed00/12403342/896dbec602a9/12876_2025_4245_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed00/12403342/eb3bdfd7943d/12876_2025_4245_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed00/12403342/b1b471d34ea0/12876_2025_4245_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed00/12403342/896dbec602a9/12876_2025_4245_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed00/12403342/eb3bdfd7943d/12876_2025_4245_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed00/12403342/b1b471d34ea0/12876_2025_4245_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed00/12403342/896dbec602a9/12876_2025_4245_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy and safety of cold snare polypectomy for outpatient treatment of sessile polyps smaller than 10mm.冷圈套息肉切除术门诊治疗10mm以下无蒂息肉的疗效及安全性
BMC Gastroenterol. 2025 Sep 2;25(1):631. doi: 10.1186/s12876-025-04245-8.
2
AGA Clinical Practice Update on Appropriate and Tailored Polypectomy: Expert Review.美国胃肠病学会关于适当和个体化息肉切除术的临床实践更新:专家综述
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Mar;22(3):470-479.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.10.012. Epub 2023 Nov 28.
3
Study on the safety and effectiveness of CSP and HSP-EMR in small polyps colorectal cancer in the elderly population: Randomized controlled trial.CSP和HSP-EMR治疗老年人群小息肉型结直肠癌的安全性和有效性研究:随机对照试验
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 Jun 20;104(25):e42863. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042863.
4
The efficacy and safety of cold snare versus hot snare polypectomy for endoscopic removal of small colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.冷圈套切除术与热圈套切除术治疗结直肠小息肉内镜下切除的疗效和安全性:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 May 19;38(1):136. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04429-2.
5
Cold snare polypectomy compared to cold forceps polypectomy for endoscopic resection of guideline defined diminutive polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.与冷活检钳息肉切除术相比,冷圈套息肉切除术用于内镜下切除指南定义的微小息肉:一项随机试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2023 Dec;42(6):757-765. doi: 10.1007/s12664-023-01441-w. Epub 2023 Sep 30.
6
Efficacy and safety of cold snare polypectomy for sessile serrated polyps ≥ 10 mm: A systematic review and meta-analysis.冷圈套息肉切除术治疗≥ 10mm 无蒂锯齿状息肉的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dig Liver Dis. 2022 Nov;54(11):1486-1493. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2022.01.132. Epub 2022 Feb 12.
7
Bleeding Risk of Cold Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy for Pedunculated Colorectal Polyps Measuring 10 mm or Less: Subgroup Analysis of a Large Randomized Controlled Trial.冷切除与热圈套息肉切除术治疗 10mm 或以下带蒂结直肠息肉的出血风险:一项大型随机对照试验的亚组分析。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Nov 1;119(11):2233-2240. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002847. Epub 2024 May 9.
8
Impact of Cold Snare vs Cold Forceps Resection of Diminutive Adenomas on Segmental Incomplete Resection Rate.冷圈套与冷活检钳切除小腺瘤对节段性不完全切除率的影响。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2023 Aug 1;118(8):1410-1418. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002289. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
9
Cold sub-mucosal injection versus traditional cold snare polypectomy for diminutive and small colorectal polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis.冷黏膜下注射与传统冷圈套息肉切除术治疗小和微小结直肠息肉的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2024 Dec;43(6):1111-1120. doi: 10.1007/s12664-024-01600-7. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
10
Efficacy and safety of cold versus hot snare polypectomy for resecting small colorectal polyps: Systematic review and meta-analysis.冷圈套与热圈套息肉切除术治疗结直肠小息肉的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dig Endosc. 2018 Sep;30(5):592-599. doi: 10.1111/den.13173. Epub 2018 May 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline - Update 2024.结直肠息肉切除术和内镜黏膜切除术:欧洲胃肠道内镜学会(ESGE)指南-2024 年更新。
Endoscopy. 2024 Jul;56(7):516-545. doi: 10.1055/a-2304-3219. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
2
Growth rates and histopathological outcomes of small (6-9 mm) colorectal polyps based on CT colonography surveillance and endoscopic removal.基于 CT 结肠成像监测和内镜下切除的小(6-9mm)结直肠息肉的生长速度和组织病理学结果。
Gut. 2023 Nov 24;72(12):2321-2328. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2022-326970.
3
Outcomes of thin versus thick-wire snares for cold snare polypectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
冷圈套息肉切除术使用细圈套器与粗圈套器的效果:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Clin Endosc. 2022 Nov;55(6):742-750. doi: 10.5946/ce.2022.141. Epub 2022 Nov 9.
4
Efficacy of specimen pasting after cold snare polypectomy for pathological evaluation of horizontal margins.冷圈套息肉切除术后标本粘贴用于水平切缘病理评估的疗效
Endosc Int Open. 2022 May 13;10(5):E572-E579. doi: 10.1055/a-1784-6723. eCollection 2022 May.
5
[China guideline for the screening, early detection and early treatment of colorectal cancer (2020, Beijing)].《中国结直肠癌筛查与早诊早治指南(2020年,北京)》
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2021 Jan 23;43(1):16-38. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20210105-00010.
6
Histopathologic features and fragmentation of polyps with cold snare defect protrusions.冷圈套缺陷突出的息肉的组织病理学特征和碎片。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2021 Apr;93(4):952-959. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.07.040. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
7
Clinical Validation of BASIC Classification for the Resect and Discard Strategy for Diminutive Colorectal Polyps.微小结直肠息肉切除并丢弃策略的BASIC分类的临床验证
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Sep;18(10):2357-2365.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.12.028. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
8
The 2019 WHO classification of tumours of the digestive system.2019年世界卫生组织消化系统肿瘤分类。
Histopathology. 2020 Jan;76(2):182-188. doi: 10.1111/his.13975. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
9
Does cold snare polypectomy completely resect the mucosal layer? A prospective single-center observational trial.冷圈套息肉切除术能否完全切除黏膜层?一项前瞻性单中心观察性试验。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Feb;35(2):241-248. doi: 10.1111/jgh.14824. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
10
Risk factors for incomplete polyp resection after cold snare polypectomy.冷圈套息肉切除术治疗后息肉不完全切除的危险因素。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019 Sep;34(9):1563-1569. doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03347-6. Epub 2019 Jul 16.