• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索护士对基于人工智能的轮班排班在公平性、透明度和工作与生活平衡方面的看法。

Exploring nurse perspectives on AI-based shift scheduling for fairness, transparency, and work-life balance.

作者信息

Gerlach Maisa, Renggli Fabienne Josefine, Bieri Jannic Stefan, Sariyar Murat, Golz Christoph

机构信息

School of Health Professions, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Murtenstrasse 10, Bern, 3008, Switzerland.

School of Engineering and Computer Science, Bern University of Applied Sciences, Biel, Switzerland.

出版信息

BMC Nurs. 2025 Sep 2;24(1):1161. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03808-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12912-025-03808-0
PMID:40898192
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12406402/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Work-life balance (WLB) is critical to nurse retention and job satisfaction in healthcare. Traditional shift scheduling, characterised by inflexible hours and limited employee control, often leads to stress and perceptions of unfairness, contributing to high turnover rates. AI-based scheduling systems are promoted as a promising solution by enabling fairer and more transparent shift distribution. This study explored the perspectives of nurse leaders, permanent nurses, and temporary nurses on the perceived fairness, transparency, and impact on WLB of AI-based shift scheduling systems, which they had not yet used.

METHODS

A qualitative study design was used, with focus group (FG) interviews conducted between May and June 2024. FG interviews were conducted with 21 participants from acute hospitals, home care services, and nursing homes between May and June 2024. The interviews were analyzed using the knowledge mapping method, which allowed for a visual representation of key discussion points and highlighted consensus among participants. The discussions centered on five main themes: (1) experiences with current scheduling systems, (2) requirements for work scheduling, (3) fair and participatory work scheduling, (4) requirements for AI in work scheduling, and (5) perceived advantages and disadvantages of AI-based work scheduling.

RESULTS

Participants reported that current scheduling practices often lacked fairness and transparency, leading to dissatisfaction, particularly among permanent nurses. While temporary staff appreciated the flexibility in their schedules, permanent nurses expressed a desire for more autonomy and fairness in shift allocation. AI-based scheduling has the potential to improve shift equity by objectively managing shifts based on pre-defined criteria, thereby reducing bias and administrative burden. However, participants raised concerns about the depersonalisation of scheduling, emphasising the need for human oversight to consider the emotional and contextual factors that AI systems may overlook.

CONCLUSION

AI-based scheduling systems were perceived as having the potential to be beneficial in improving fairness, transparency and WLB for nurses. However, the integration of these systems must be accompanied by careful consideration of the human element and ongoing collaboration with healthcare professionals to ensure that the technology is aligned with organisational needs. By striking a balance between AI-driven efficiency and human judgement, healthcare organisations can improve nurse satisfaction and retention, ultimately benefiting patient care and organisational efficiency.

摘要

引言

工作与生活的平衡(WLB)对于医疗保健领域护士的留用和工作满意度至关重要。传统的轮班排班方式,其特点是工作时间不灵活且员工控制权有限,常常导致压力和不公平感,进而造成高离职率。基于人工智能的排班系统被视为一种有前景的解决方案,因为它能实现更公平、更透明的轮班分配。本研究探讨了护士领导者、长期护士和临时护士对尚未使用的基于人工智能的轮班排班系统在感知公平性、透明度以及对工作与生活平衡的影响方面的看法。

方法

采用定性研究设计,于2024年5月至6月进行焦点小组(FG)访谈。2024年5月至6月期间,对来自急症医院、家庭护理服务机构和养老院的21名参与者进行了焦点小组访谈。访谈采用知识图谱法进行分析,该方法能够直观呈现关键讨论点,并突出参与者之间的共识。讨论集中在五个主要主题上:(1)当前排班系统的经验;(2)工作排班的要求;(3)公平且参与性强的工作排班;(4)工作排班中对人工智能的要求;(5)基于人工智能的工作排班的感知优缺点。

结果

参与者报告称,当前的排班做法往往缺乏公平性和透明度,导致不满情绪,尤其是长期护士。虽然临时员工欣赏其排班的灵活性,但长期护士表示希望在轮班分配上有更多自主权和公平性。基于人工智能的排班有潜力通过根据预定义标准客观管理轮班来提高轮班公平性,从而减少偏见和行政负担。然而,参与者对排班的非人性化表示担忧,强调需要人为监督,以考虑人工智能系统可能忽略的情感和背景因素。

结论

基于人工智能的排班系统被认为有可能在提高护士的公平性、透明度和工作与生活平衡方面带来益处。然而,在整合这些系统时,必须仔细考虑人为因素,并与医疗保健专业人员持续合作,以确保技术与组织需求相契合。通过在人工智能驱动的效率和人为判断之间取得平衡,医疗保健组织可以提高护士满意度和留用率,最终使患者护理和组织效率受益。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/508f/12406402/fee17d908ac5/12912_2025_3808_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/508f/12406402/fee17d908ac5/12912_2025_3808_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/508f/12406402/fee17d908ac5/12912_2025_3808_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring nurse perspectives on AI-based shift scheduling for fairness, transparency, and work-life balance.探索护士对基于人工智能的轮班排班在公平性、透明度和工作与生活平衡方面的看法。
BMC Nurs. 2025 Sep 2;24(1):1161. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03808-0.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
4
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
5
Consequences, costs and cost-effectiveness of workforce configurations in English acute hospitals.英国急症医院劳动力配置的后果、成本及成本效益
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jul;13(25):1-107. doi: 10.3310/ZBAR9152.
6
A model of occupational stress to assess impact of COVID-19 on critical care and redeployed nurses: a mixed-methods study.一种评估 COVID-19 对重症护理和重新调配护士影响的职业压力模型:一项混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Dec 18:1-32. doi: 10.3310/PWRT8714.
7
Community and hospital-based healthcare professionals perceptions of digital advance care planning for palliative and end-of-life care: a latent class analysis.社区和医院的医疗保健专业人员对姑息治疗和临终关怀的数字预立医疗计划的看法:一项潜在类别分析。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun 25:1-22. doi: 10.3310/XCGE3294.
8
Feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness of laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy for women and healthcare professionals: the LAVA trial qualitative process evaluation.腹腔镜子宫切除术与腹式子宫切除术对女性和医护人员的可行性、可接受性及适宜性:LAVA试验定性过程评估
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul 23:1-21. doi: 10.3310/GJTC1325.
9
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.
10
Healthcare workers' informal uses of mobile phones and other mobile devices to support their work: a qualitative evidence synthesis.医护人员非正规使用手机和其他移动设备来支持工作:定性证据综合评价。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 27;8(8):CD015705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015705.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Nursing Care: A Systematic Review.人工智能在护理中的应用:一项系统综述。
J Nurs Manag. 2023 Jul 26;2023:3219127. doi: 10.1155/2023/3219127. eCollection 2023.
2
Optimizing Nursing Productivity: Exploring the Role of Artificial Intelligence, Technology Integration, Competencies, and Leadership.优化护理生产力:探索人工智能、技术整合、能力和领导力的作用。
J Nurs Manag. 2024 Jun 26;2024:8371068. doi: 10.1155/2024/8371068. eCollection 2024.
3
How Artificial Intelligence is altering the nursing workforce.
人工智能如何改变护理劳动力。
Nurs Outlook. 2025 Jan-Feb;73(1):102300. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2024.102300. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
4
Not all AI health tools with regulatory authorization are clinically validated.并非所有获得监管授权的人工智能健康工具都经过临床验证。
Nat Med. 2024 Oct;30(10):2718-2720. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03203-3.
5
A comprehensive overview of barriers and strategies for AI implementation in healthcare: Mixed-method design.人工智能在医疗保健中的应用障碍和策略的综合概述:混合方法设计。
PLoS One. 2024 Aug 9;19(8):e0305949. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305949. eCollection 2024.
6
Factors associated with health professionals' stress reactions, job satisfaction, intention to leave and health-related outcomes in acute care, rehabilitation and psychiatric hospitals, nursing homes and home care organisations.与急性护理医院、康复医院、精神病医院、疗养院及家庭护理机构中医疗专业人员的应激反应、工作满意度、离职意向及健康相关结果相关的因素。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 2;24(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10718-5.
7
Clinicians' Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence: Focus on Workload, Risk, Trust, Clinical Decision Making, and Clinical Integration.临床医生对人工智能的看法:关注工作量、风险、信任、临床决策和临床整合。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Aug 16;11(16):2308. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11162308.
8
An integrative review on the acceptance of artificial intelligence among healthcare professionals in hospitals.关于医院医护人员对人工智能接受度的综合综述。
NPJ Digit Med. 2023 Jun 10;6(1):111. doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00852-5.
9
Association of Work Schedules With Nurse Turnover: A Cross-Sectional National Study.工作安排与护士离职的关联:一项全国性的横断面研究。
Int J Public Health. 2023 Apr 24;68:1605732. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2023.1605732. eCollection 2023.
10
Co-created Technological Solutions for Caregivers in Health Care: Systematic Review.共同创建医疗保健护理人员的技术解决方案:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 May 1;25:e41260. doi: 10.2196/41260.