Gupta Nupur, Gupta Shikha, Morris Alison, Chandra Divay
College of Letters and Science, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Respir Res. 2025 Sep 2;26(1):268. doi: 10.1186/s12931-025-03301-x.
The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted many aspects of academic research, particularly for early career investigators striving for independence. This study examines geographic heterogeneity in the pandemic's impact on the publication productivity of recipients of National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute K01, K08, and K23 awards within Departments of Medicine across different states in the US using data from the National Institutes of Health RePORTER and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID data tracker from 2015 to 2022. Findings indicate that while publication productivity increased steadily until 2020, it plateaued soon after. K-awardees in states with an early peak in COVID-19-related deaths maintained relatively stable productivity levels post-2020, whereas those in states with a late peak experienced a decline. The observed geographic differences may stem from variations in pandemic response measures, resource availability, and institutional support. These findings highlight the need for careful consideration of geographic heterogeneity when designing targeted interventions, such as funding support and tenure extensions, to mitigate the pandemic's impact on early career investigators. Addressing additional factors, including career stage, personal responsibilities, and institutional environments, is essential for a comprehensive understanding of disparities in publication productivity.
新冠疫情扰乱了学术研究的许多方面,尤其是对于那些努力实现独立的早期职业研究人员而言。本研究利用美国国立卫生研究院报告系统(National Institutes of Health RePORTER)和疾病控制与预防中心(Centers for Disease Control and Prevention)2015年至2022年的新冠数据追踪器的数据,考察了疫情对美国不同州各医学系国立心肺血液研究所K01、K08和K23奖获得者发表论文产出的影响的地理异质性。研究结果表明,虽然论文产出在2020年之前稳步增长,但之后不久就趋于平稳。新冠相关死亡病例早期达到峰值的州的K奖获得者在2020年后保持了相对稳定的产出水平,而那些峰值出现较晚的州的获得者则出现了下降。观察到的地理差异可能源于疫情应对措施、资源可用性和机构支持的不同。这些发现凸显了在设计有针对性的干预措施(如资金支持和延长任期)以减轻疫情对早期职业研究人员的影响时,需要仔细考虑地理异质性。考虑包括职业阶段、个人责任和机构环境等其他因素,对于全面理解论文产出的差异至关重要。