Zhou Bo, Raval Amit D, Zhang Yifan, Korn Matthew J, Sambamoorthi Nethra, Rasu Rafia, Littleton Natasha, Constantinovici Niculae, Sambamoorthi Usha
University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.
Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Whippany, New Jersey, USA.
Cancer Med. 2025 Sep;14(17):e71176. doi: 10.1002/cam4.71176.
This study evaluated treatment patterns and factors associated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) intensification with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI) and/or docetaxel among older men with mHSPC in the United States.
The study utilized a retrospective cohort of 6850 older men (age ≥ 67 years) diagnosed with mHSPC between July 2016 and December 2019 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Medicare-linked database. Men must maintain continuous enrollment in Medicare fee-for-service Parts A/B/D for ≥ 12 months before mHSPC diagnosis and ≥ 6 months after diagnosis. Initial treatment was classified as ADT alone, ADT + ARPI, or ADT + docetaxel. Factors associated with initial treatment were examined using multivariable multinomial logistic regression.
The study cohort (mean age = 76.6 years, SD = 7.0) was mostly non-Hispanic white (77.7%), followed by non-Hispanic Black (8.4%) and Hispanic (6.5%). 30.4% received no systemic drug therapy within 6 months of mHSPC diagnosis, 47.1% received ADT alone, 14.8% received ADT + ARPI, and 5.9% received ADT + docetaxel. Among men treated with ADT, there was an increase in ADT + ARPI treatment from 19.0% to 30.0% and a concomitant decline in ADT monotherapy from 72.1% to 62.6% between 2017 and 2019, while ADT + docetaxel treatment marginally decreased from 8.8% to 7.3%. In multinomial logistic regression, men with de novo mHSPC were more likely to receive ADT + docetaxel (aOR = 2.73, 95% CI = [2.07, 3.60]) or ADT + ARPI (aOR = 1.56, 95% CI = [1.32, 1.84]); whereas men with higher frailty index were less likely to receive ADT + docetaxel (aOR = 0.93, 95% CI = [0.91, 0.95]) or ADT + ARPI (aOR = 0.97, 95% CI = [0.96, 0.98]). Specifically, ADT + ARPI was less likely to be utilized among the lower socio-economic status groups.
Three in 10 older men with mHSPC received no systemic treatment. Although there was a gradual uptake of ARPIs, monotherapy with ADT was still highly prevalent, suggesting the integration of intensified treatment is still suboptimal. Targeted interventions are necessary to enhance guideline adherence among older and frail men with mHSPC.
本研究评估了美国老年转移性去势敏感性前列腺癌(mHSPC)患者中与雄激素剥夺治疗(ADT)强化联合雄激素受体通路抑制剂(ARPI)和/或多西他赛相关的治疗模式及因素。
该研究利用了一个回顾性队列,研究对象为2016年7月至2019年12月期间从监测、流行病学和最终结果医疗保险关联数据库中确诊为mHSPC的6850名老年男性(年龄≥67岁)。男性在mHSPC诊断前必须连续参加医疗保险A/B/D部分的按服务收费计划≥12个月,诊断后≥6个月。初始治疗分为单纯ADT、ADT + ARPI或ADT + 多西他赛。使用多变量多项逻辑回归分析与初始治疗相关的因素。
研究队列(平均年龄 = 76.6岁,标准差 = 7.0)主要为非西班牙裔白人(77.7%),其次是非西班牙裔黑人(8.4%)和西班牙裔(6.5%)。30.4%的患者在mHSPC诊断后6个月内未接受全身药物治疗,47.1%接受单纯ADT,14.8%接受ADT + ARPI,5.9%接受ADT + 多西他赛。在接受ADT治疗的男性中,2017年至2019年间,ADT + ARPI治疗从19.0%增加到30.0%,同时ADT单药治疗从72.1%下降到62.6%,而ADT + 多西他赛治疗从8.8%略微下降到7.3%。在多项逻辑回归中,初发mHSPC患者更有可能接受ADT + 多西他赛(调整后比值比[aOR]=2.73,95%置信区间[CI]=[2.07, 3.60])或ADT + ARPI(aOR = 1.56,95% CI = [1.32, 1.84]);而衰弱指数较高的男性接受ADT + 多西他赛(aOR = 0.93,95% CI = [0.91, 0.95])或ADT + ARPI(aOR = 0.97,95% CI = [0.96, 0.98])的可能性较小。具体而言,社会经济地位较低的群体使用ADT + ARPI的可能性较小。
十分之三的老年mHSPC患者未接受全身治疗。尽管ARPI的使用逐渐增加,但ADT单药治疗仍然非常普遍,这表明强化治疗的整合仍不理想。有必要采取针对性干预措施,以提高老年和体弱mHSPC患者对指南的依从性。