Suzuki Yuta, Kamiya Kentaro, Hoshi Keika, Tanaka Shinya, Harada Manae, Watanabe Takaaki, Shimoda Takahiro, Yamamoto Shohei, Matsunaga Yusuke, Matsuzawa Ryota, Matsunaga Atsuhiko
Center for Outcomes Research and Economic Evaluation for Health, National Institute of Public Health, 2-3-6 Minami, Wako, Saitama, 351-0197, Japan.
Department of Rehabilitation, School of Allied Health Sciences, Kitasato University, Kanagawa, Japan.
J Nephrol. 2025 Sep 3. doi: 10.1007/s40620-025-02383-6.
While electrical muscle stimulation during hemodialysis has been reported to improve physical performance in middle-aged patients, clinical evidence regarding its efficacy in older patients with frailty remains limited.
In this crossover trial, we randomly assigned 18 older patients (aged ≥ 65 years) with frailty receiving maintenance hemodialysis in a 1:1 ratio to the study intervention. Group 1 underwent electrical muscle stimulation first, followed by a five-week washout period, and then the control session without electrical muscle stimulation. Group 2 received the control session first, followed by the electrical muscle stimulation sessions. Eligible patients had physical frailty defined by a Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score of 4-9 points. Electrical muscle stimulation was conducted for 30-40 min per day, 3 days a week, over 5 weeks, during hemodialysis sessions. The primary outcome was the difference in quadriceps isometric strength before and after the treatment period.
Among 18 patients who were randomized, 16 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (median age: 76 years [Q1 to Q3, 72 to 79]; men: 38%; median SPPB: 6 points [Q1 to Q3, 5 to 9]). The median change in quadriceps isometric strength (Q1 to Q3) was 1.5%dry weight (%DW) (0.2 to 4.2) during the electrical muscle stimulation intervention period and - 3.6%DW (- 7.7 to - 1.6) during the control period (P = 0.0027).
Our trial found that intradialytic electrical muscle stimulation was associated with improved quadriceps isometric strength in older patients with frailty, indicating a potential benefit of intradialytic electrical muscle stimulation intervention for physical performance, also in these subjects.
The study was registered in a public trial registry (UMIN-CTR, number: UMIN000032501).
虽然有报道称血液透析期间进行肌肉电刺激可改善中年患者的身体机能,但关于其对老年体弱患者疗效的临床证据仍然有限。
在这项交叉试验中,我们将18名接受维持性血液透析的老年体弱患者(年龄≥65岁)按1:1比例随机分配至研究干预组。第1组先接受肌肉电刺激,随后有为期5周的洗脱期,然后是无肌肉电刺激的对照阶段。第2组先接受对照阶段,随后是肌肉电刺激阶段。符合条件的患者身体虚弱,由简短体能状况量表(SPPB)评分为4 - 9分来定义。在血液透析期间,每周3天,持续5周,每天进行30 - 40分钟的肌肉电刺激。主要结局是治疗期前后股四头肌等长肌力的差异。
在随机分组的18名患者中,16名患者纳入意向性分析(中位年龄:76岁[四分位间距,72至79岁];男性:38%;中位SPPB:6分[四分位间距,5至9分])。在肌肉电刺激干预期,股四头肌等长肌力的中位变化(四分位间距)为1.5%干重(%DW)(0.2至4.2),而在对照期为 - 3.6%DW( - 7.7至 - 1.6)(P = 0.0027)。
我们的试验发现,透析期间的肌肉电刺激与老年体弱患者股四头肌等长肌力改善相关,表明透析期间肌肉电刺激干预对这些受试者的身体机能也有潜在益处。
该研究已在公共试验注册库注册(UMIN - CTR,编号:UMIN000032501)。