Suppr超能文献

患者报告结局指标(PROMs)的系统评价:有效沟通的表格模板

Systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): table templates for effective communication.

作者信息

Elsman Ellen B M, Boers Maarten, Terwee Caroline B, Beaton Dorcas, Abma Inger, Aiyegbusi Olalekan Lee, Chiarotto Alessandro, Haywood Kirstie, Matvienko-Sikar Karen, Mehdipour Ava, Oosterveer Diana M, Mokkink Lidwine B, Offringa Martin

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Methodology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2025 Sep 3. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-04058-y.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs) are an important tool to guide the selection of OMIs for research and clinical practice. However, presenting the large amount of complex data pertaining both to the quality of each study (i.e., risk of bias) as well as the quality of the instrument (i.e., measurement properties), along with the underpinning certainty of evidence, is challenging. Here, we aim to provide guidance on optimizing data presentation in OMI systematic reviews, specifically focusing on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs).

METHODS

A multidisciplinary team of experts in OMI systematic reviews, research reporting, and data visualization built on existing table templates from OMERACT and the COSMIN initiative, to align with reporting items in a recently developed reporting guideline for systematic reviews of OMIs: PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024. To enhance clarity and usability, we applied data visualization principles by reducing non-essential elements and improving interpretability through structured layouts and concise explanatory text.

RESULTS

We present eight templates for reporting PROM systematic review results: three pertain to PROM characteristics, two to studies' characteristics, two to the evaluation of measurement properties, and one to the summary of findings. We also provide recommendations on whether to include these templates in the review's main manuscript or in the supplementary materials. Word versions of these templates can be downloaded from www.prisma-cosmin.ca and www.cosmin.nl .

CONCLUSION

Templates complementing the PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024 reporting guidance can be used to standardize and enhance the clarity and usefulness of OMI systematic reviews focusing on PROMs. They comprise a comprehensive set of tools to effectively report OMI systematic reviews, in service of end-users who are selecting OMIs.

摘要

目的

对结局测量工具(OMIs)进行系统评价是指导研究和临床实践中选择OMIs的重要工具。然而,呈现与每项研究的质量(即偏倚风险)以及工具的质量(即测量属性)相关的大量复杂数据,以及证据的基础确定性,具有挑战性。在此,我们旨在为优化OMI系统评价中的数据呈现提供指导,特别关注患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs)。

方法

一个由OMI系统评价、研究报告和数据可视化方面的专家组成的多学科团队,以OMERACT和COSMIN倡议的现有表格模板为基础,使其与最近制定的OMIs系统评价报告指南中的报告项目保持一致:2024年OMIs的PRISMA-COSMIN。为了提高清晰度和可用性,我们应用数据可视化原则,减少非必要元素,并通过结构化布局和简洁的解释性文本提高可解释性。

结果

我们展示了八个用于报告PROM系统评价结果的模板:三个与PROM特征相关,两个与研究特征相关,两个与测量属性评估相关,一个与结果总结相关。我们还就是否将这些模板纳入评价的主要手稿或补充材料提供了建议。这些模板的Word版本可从www.prisma-cosmin.ca和www.cosmin.nl下载。

结论

补充2024年OMIs的PRISMA-COSMIN报告指南的模板可用于规范和提高专注于PROMs的OMI系统评价的清晰度和实用性。它们构成了一套全面的工具,可有效地报告OMI系统评价,服务于选择OMIs的最终用户。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验