文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

报告结局测量工具(OMIs)系统评价的指南:PRISMA-COSMIN 2024 年 OMIs 版。

Guideline for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs): PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024.

机构信息

Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2024 Sep;173:111422. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111422. Epub 2024 Jul 9.


DOI:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111422
PMID:38849061
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Although comprehensive and widespread guidelines on how to conduct systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs) exist, for example from the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments) initiative, key information is often missing in published reports. This article describes the development of an extension of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guideline: PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024. METHODS: The development process followed the Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research (EQUATOR) guidelines and included a literature search, expert consultations, a Delphi study, a hybrid workgroup meeting, pilot testing, and an end-of-project meeting, with integrated patient/public involvement. RESULTS: From the literature and expert consultation, 49 potentially relevant reporting items were identified. Round 1 of the Delphi study was completed by 103 panelists, whereas round 2 and 3 were completed by 78 panelists. After 3 rounds, agreement (≥67%) on inclusion and wording was reached for 44 items. Eleven items without consensus for inclusion and/or wording were discussed at a workgroup meeting attended by 24 participants. Agreement was reached for the inclusion and wording of 10 items, and the deletion of 1 item. Pilot testing with 65 authors of OMI systematic reviews further improved the guideline through minor changes in wording and structure, finalized during the end-of-project meeting. The final checklist to facilitate the reporting of full systematic review reports contains 54 (sub)items addressing the review's title, abstract, plain language summary, open science, introduction, methods, results, and discussion. Thirteen items pertaining to the title and abstract are also included in a separate abstract checklist, guiding authors in reporting for example conference abstracts. CONCLUSION: PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024 consists of two checklists (full reports; abstracts), their corresponding explanation and elaboration documents detailing the rationale and examples for each item, and a data flow diagram. PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024 can improve the reporting of systematic reviews of OMIs, fostering their reproducibility and allowing end-users to appraise the quality of OMIs and select the most appropriate OMI for a specific application. NOTE: This paper was jointly developed by Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Quality of Life Research, Journal of Patient Reported Outcomes, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes and jointly published by Elsevier Inc, Springer Nature Switzerland AG, and BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature. The articles are identical except for minor stylistic and spelling differences in keeping with each journal's style. Either citation can be used when citing this article.

摘要

背景与目的:尽管存在关于如何进行结局测量工具(OMI)系统评价的全面且广泛的指南,例如来自 COSMIN(COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments)倡议的指南,但发表的报告中通常会缺少关键信息。本文描述了对 2020 年系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南的扩展:2024 年 OMIs 的 PRISMA-COSMIN 的制定过程。 方法:该开发过程遵循改善卫生研究质量和透明度(EQUATOR)指南,并包括文献检索、专家咨询、德尔菲研究、混合工作组会议、试点测试以及项目结束会议,同时整合了患者/公众的参与。 结果:从文献和专家咨询中,确定了 49 个潜在相关的报告项目。德尔菲研究的第一轮完成于 103 名小组成员,第二轮和第三轮则分别完成于 78 名小组成员。经过 3 轮后,有 44 个项目的纳入和措辞达成了≥67%的共识。11 个项目在 24 名与会者参加的工作组会议上进行了讨论,以确定纳入和措辞。10 个项目的纳入和措辞达成了共识,删除了 1 个项目。对 65 篇 OMI 系统评价的作者进行了试点测试,通过对报告进行细微的措辞和结构修改,进一步完善了指南,最终在项目结束会议上完成。最终的检查表有助于全面报告系统评价报告,包含 54 个(子)项目,涵盖了综述的标题、摘要、通俗易懂的摘要、开放科学、引言、方法、结果和讨论。还有 13 个与标题和摘要相关的项目包含在单独的摘要检查表中,指导作者报告,例如会议摘要。 结论:2024 年 OMIs 的 PRISMA-COSMIN 由两个检查表(完整报告;摘要)、相应的解释和说明文件组成,这些文件详细说明了每个项目的基本原理和示例,以及数据流程图。2024 年 OMIs 的 PRISMA-COSMIN 可以提高 OMIs 系统评价的报告质量,促进其可重复性,并允许最终用户评估 OMIs 的质量并为特定应用选择最合适的 OMI。注:本文由《临床流行病学杂志》、《生活质量研究杂志》、《患者报告结局杂志》、《健康与生活质量结果杂志》共同制定,由爱思唯尔公司、施普林格自然瑞士分社和生物医学中心有限公司联合出版,均为爱思唯尔公司旗下期刊。这些文章除了符合每个期刊风格的细微风格和拼写差异外,其余均相同。在引用本文时,可以使用任意一种引文。

相似文献

[1]
Guideline for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs): PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2024-9

[2]
Guideline for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs): PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024.

J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2024-7-9

[3]
Guideline for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs): PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024.

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2024-7-9

[4]
Guideline for reporting systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments (OMIs): PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024.

Qual Life Res. 2024-8

[5]
Study protocol for developing, piloting and disseminating the PRISMA-COSMIN guideline: a new reporting guideline for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments.

Syst Rev. 2022-6-13

[6]
Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies: The PRISMA-DTA Statement.

JAMA. 2018-1-23

[7]
A blueprint for patient and public involvement in the development of a reporting guideline for systematic reviews of outcome measurement instruments: PRISMA-COSMIN for OMIs 2024.

Res Involv Engagem. 2024-3-21

[8]
Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: development of the PRIOR statement.

BMJ. 2022-8-9

[9]
Measuring communication as a core outcome in aphasia trials: Results of the ROMA-2 international core outcome set development meeting.

Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023

[10]
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-1

引用本文的文献

[1]
Operational efficiencies and sustainable bioprocessing in electro-fermentation and microbial fuel cells.

Bioprocess Biosyst Eng. 2025-9-9

[2]
Systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): table templates for effective communication.

Qual Life Res. 2025-9-3

[3]
Instruments for measuring grief in bereaved adults: a protocol for a COSMIN-based systematic review.

BMJ Open. 2025-8-24

[4]
Barriers and facilitators for self-harm: development and validation of an instrument for health professionals.

Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2025-8-18

[5]
What measures have been used to explore the outcomes of family members of critically ill patients: a scoping review.

Intensive Care Med. 2025-8-12

[6]
Psychometric properties of patient-reported outcome measures in chronic pain conditions with central sensitization- a systematic review and meta-analysis.

J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2025-7-11

[7]
Urdu translation and validation of the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Female Sexual Matters Associated with Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Module (ICIQ-FLUTS sex).

Pak J Med Sci. 2025-4

[8]
Systematic review on the measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for measuring well-being in young children.

BMJ Open. 2025-4-19

[9]
Quality of Assessment Tools for Aphasia: A Systematic Review.

Brain Sci. 2025-3-3

[10]
Enhancing Emotional Intelligence in Autism Spectrum Disorder Through Intervention: A Systematic Review.

Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2025-3-10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索