• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本2025年核医学国家诊断参考水平的制定。

Establishment of National Diagnostic Reference Levels 2025 for nuclear medicine in Japan.

作者信息

Abe Koichiro, Baba Shingo, Etani Reo, Fujimto Takahiro, Hosono Makoto, Iimori Takashi, Inaki Anri, Ishiguro Masanobu, Miyaji Noriaki, Okizaki Atsutaka, Sasaki Takeshi, Tsushima Hiroyuki, Watanabe Hiroshi, Watanabe Masanori, Yada Nobuhiro

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo, 160-0023, Japan.

Department of Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-Ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.

出版信息

Ann Nucl Med. 2025 Sep 3. doi: 10.1007/s12149-025-02102-y.

DOI:10.1007/s12149-025-02102-y
PMID:40900285
Abstract

Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) are practical benchmarks for optimizing patient radiation exposure in medical imaging. In Japan, national DRLs, including those for nuclear medicine together and other radiological procedures, were first established in 2015 and revised in 2020. In this study, we revised the DRL values of nuclear medicine for the establishment of DRLs2025, based on data collected from institutions nationwide throughout Japan. Data were collected via an online survey from facilities performing nuclear medicine procedures, including SPECT, PET, and hybrid CT imaging. Information on dose activity of the administered radiopharmaceuticals and CT parameters (CTDIvol and DLP) were collected. DRL values were determined through analysis of the submitted data, supplemented by panel discussions among experts taking into account the clinical appropriateness of the values and various technological factors. Overall, the newly established DRLs2025 demonstrated a decreasing trend in administered radiopharmaceutical activities, CTDIvol, and DLP compared with the previous surveys. This trend reflects ongoing efforts toward the optimization of radiation exposure and radiopharmaceutical dose reduction, likely driven by the introduction of image reconstruction methods based on newer technologies. However, substantial interfacility variations were observed, particularly in the CT parameters, suggesting disparities in equipment, imaging protocols, and the balance between image quality and radiation dose. The establishment of DRLs2025 underscores continued progress in optimizing radiation exposure in nuclear medicine practice in Japan. Although issues regarding data variability and quality remain, DRLs continue to be a key tool in radiation protection and quality assurance. Ongoing efforts to improve data collection systems and to align procedures with international standards are essential for the future refinement of DRLs.

摘要

诊断参考水平(DRLs)是优化医学成像中患者辐射剂量的实用基准。在日本,包括核医学及其他放射学检查的全国性DRLs于2015年首次制定,并于2020年进行了修订。在本研究中,我们基于从日本全国各机构收集的数据,对核医学的DRL值进行了修订,以建立2025年DRLs。数据通过在线调查从开展核医学检查的机构收集,包括单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)、正电子发射断层扫描(PET)和混合CT成像。收集了所施用放射性药物的剂量活性信息以及CT参数(容积CT剂量指数[CTDIvol]和剂量长度乘积[DLP])。通过对提交数据的分析确定DRL值,并辅以专家小组讨论,同时考虑到这些值的临床适用性和各种技术因素。总体而言,与之前的调查相比,新建立的2025年DRLs显示所施用放射性药物活性、CTDIvol和DLP呈下降趋势。这一趋势反映了在优化辐射剂量和降低放射性药物剂量方面持续做出的努力,这可能是由基于新技术的图像重建方法的引入所推动的。然而,观察到各机构之间存在较大差异,尤其是在CT参数方面,这表明在设备、成像方案以及图像质量与辐射剂量之间的平衡方面存在差异。2025年DRLs的建立凸显了日本在优化核医学实践中辐射剂量方面的持续进展。尽管数据变异性和质量方面的问题仍然存在,但DRLs仍然是辐射防护和质量保证的关键工具。持续努力改进数据收集系统并使程序与国际标准保持一致对于未来完善DRLs至关重要。

相似文献

1
Establishment of National Diagnostic Reference Levels 2025 for nuclear medicine in Japan.日本2025年核医学国家诊断参考水平的制定。
Ann Nucl Med. 2025 Sep 3. doi: 10.1007/s12149-025-02102-y.
2
Pediatric Local Diagnostic Reference Levels for CT Examinations: A Study Based on the European Guidelines on Diagnostic Reference Levels for Pediatric Imaging.儿童CT检查的局部诊断参考水平:一项基于欧洲儿科影像诊断参考水平指南的研究。
Cureus. 2025 Jun 3;17(6):e85284. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85284. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Setting up a national diagnostic reference level for computed tomography for the public sector in Costa Rica: first step.为哥斯达黎加公共部门的计算机断层扫描建立国家诊断参考水平:第一步。
Appl Radiat Isot. 2025 Jul 11;225:112043. doi: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2025.112043.
5
Current practices and perceptions on diagnostic reference levels: a EuroSafe Imaging Survey Analysis.关于诊断参考水平的当前实践与认知:一项欧洲影像安全调查分析
Insights Imaging. 2025 Jul 18;16(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s13244-025-02028-z.
6
Establishing Local Diagnostic Reference Levels and Reference Curves for Thorax and Abdomen-Pelvis Paediatric CT Procedures.建立儿童胸部及腹部-盆腔CT检查的本地诊断参考水平和参考曲线。
Acta Med Litu. 2025;32(1):120-125. doi: 10.15388/Amed.2025.32.1.12. Epub 2025 Feb 18.
7
Age-based diagnostic reference levels and achievable doses for paediatric CT: a survey in Shanghai, China.基于年龄的儿童CT诊断参考水平及可达到的剂量:中国上海的一项调查
J Radiol Prot. 2024 Apr 23;44(2). doi: 10.1088/1361-6498/ad3ce5.
8
Clinical Indication-Based Pediatric Diagnostic Reference Level Values for Abdominal Computed Tomography: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study.基于临床指征的儿童腹部计算机断层扫描诊断参考水平值:一项描述性横断面研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 20;8(7):e70916. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70916. eCollection 2025 Jul.
9
The QuADRANT project: Enhancing quality and safety in radiological procedures through clinical audit.象限项目:通过临床审计提高放射学程序的质量和安全性。
Cancer Radiother. 2025 Aug 11;29(5-6):104689. doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2025.104689.
10
National survey to update the diagnostic reference levels in interventional radiology procedures in Italy: working methodology.全国范围内更新意大利介入放射学程序诊断参考水平的调查:工作方法。
J Radiol Prot. 2024 Jan 29;44(1). doi: 10.1088/1361-6498/ad1fe1.

本文引用的文献

1
Intra-Arterial Drug Delivery of Both a Small and Large Molecule Theranostic Radiotracer Probe into an Orthotopic OncoPIG Liver Tumor Model After Pseudovascular Isolation.在假血管隔离后,将小分子和大分子治疗诊断放射性示踪剂探针经动脉内给药至原位OncoPIG肝肿瘤模型。
Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2025 Aug;59(4):217-228. doi: 10.1007/s13139-024-00892-z. Epub 2024 Nov 21.
2
Projected Lifetime Cancer Risks From Current Computed Tomography Imaging.当前计算机断层扫描成像的预计终生癌症风险
JAMA Intern Med. 2025 Apr 14. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2025.0505.
3
Establishment of National Diagnostic Reference Levels for Administered Activity in Diagnostic Nuclear Medicine in Thailand.
泰国诊断核医学中给药放射性活度的国家诊断参考水平的建立。
J Nucl Med Technol. 2024 Jun 5;52(2):158-162. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.123.266836.
4
A systematic review and meta-analysis on the radiation dose of computed tomography in hybrid nuclear medicine imaging.关于混合核医学成像中计算机断层扫描辐射剂量的系统评价和荟萃分析。
EJNMMI Phys. 2023 May 25;10(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40658-023-00553-8.
5
National Diagnostic Reference Levels for Nuclear Medicine in Qatar.卡塔尔核医学国家诊断参考水平
J Nucl Med Technol. 2023 Mar;51(1):63-67. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.122.264415. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
6
Deep learning reconstruction allows low-dose imaging while maintaining image quality: comparison of deep learning reconstruction and hybrid iterative reconstruction in contrast-enhanced abdominal CT.深度学习重建可实现低剂量成像,同时保持图像质量:对比增强腹部CT中深度学习重建与混合迭代重建的比较
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022 May;12(5):2977-2984. doi: 10.21037/qims-21-1216.
7
Diagnostic Reference Levels for nuclear medicine imaging in Austria: A nationwide survey of used dose levels for adult patients.奥地利核医学影像诊断参考水平:一项针对成年患者应用剂量水平的全国性调查。
Z Med Phys. 2022 Aug;32(3):283-295. doi: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2021.11.007. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
8
National Diagnostic Reference Levels for Nuclear Medicine in Kuwait.科威特核医学国家诊断参考水平。
J Nucl Med Technol. 2022 Mar;50(1):54-59. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.121.262175. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
9
The 2020 national diagnostic reference levels for nuclear medicine in Japan.2020 年日本核医学国家诊断参考水平。
Ann Nucl Med. 2020 Nov;34(11):799-806. doi: 10.1007/s12149-020-01512-4. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
10
Worldwide Diagnostic Reference Levels for Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography Myocardial Perfusion Imaging: Findings From INCAPS.全球单光子发射计算机断层心肌灌注成像诊断参考水平:INCAPS 研究结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Mar;14(3):657-665. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2020.06.029. Epub 2020 Aug 19.