• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经纵隔与微创McKeown食管癌切除术治疗食管癌的比较评估:围手术期及肿瘤学结局

Comparative evaluation of transmediastinal and minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: perioperative and oncologic outcomes.

作者信息

Ni Zhichao, Zhu Zigui, Shi Xin, Xia Xi, Liu Yan, Cui YeHua, Zhang Yi, Zhang Jianxin

机构信息

Department of General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The Affiliated Nanhua Hospital, Hengyang Medical College, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China.

Intensive Care Unit, The Affiliated Nanhua Hospital, Hengyang Medical College, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2025 Aug 18;15:1644505. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1644505. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fonc.2025.1644505
PMID:40900795
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12399402/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma remains a major health burden in China, where surgical resection is the mainstay of curative therapy. The conventional minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy (MIE-McKeown), although oncologically effective, entails transthoracic access and single-lung ventilation, often resulting in higher postoperative morbidity. Thoraco-laparoscopic transmediastinal esophagectomy has emerged as a novel alternative that may mitigate these risks while preserving oncologic integrity.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 268 patients with resectable middle or lower thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (clinical stage I-III), including 131 who underwent transmediastinal esophagectomy and 137 who received MIE-McKeown. Outcomes assessed included operative time, intraoperative blood loss, lymph node yield, complication profiles, recovery indicators, quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30), and 6-month disease-free survival (DFS). Statistical comparisons were performed using t-tests, χ² tests, and multivariate logistic regression.

RESULTS

The transmediastinal esophagectomy group exhibited significantly shorter operative time (197.2 ± 25.9 286.5 ± 32.1 min, <0.001) and reduced blood loss (155.4 ± 40.2 260.7 ± 65.1 mL, <0.001). Time to oral intake (4.6 ± 1.1 6.2 ± 1.3 days, <0.001), drainage duration (3.8 ± 0.5 4.4 ± 0.7 days, <0.001), and hospital stay (9.3 ± 1.8 11.1 ± 2.2 days, <0.001) were all significantly improved in the transmediastinal esophagectomy group. The incidence of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III complications was lower (7.6% 16.0%, =0.043), particularly pneumonia (7.6% 18.2%, =0.009) and recurrent laryngeal nerve injury (4.6% 11.7%, =0.031). Lymph node harvest was comparable (21.4 ± 6.2 22.1 ± 5.9, =0.344). Three-month quality-of-life scores were higher in the transmediastinal esophagectomy group for global health (73.4 ± 12.1 66.5 ± 13.4, =0.005), physical functioning (78.2 ± 11.8 70.6 ± 13.6, =0.008), and role functioning (72.1 ± 14.2 64.3 ± 15.1, =0.011). The 6-month DFS rates were similar between groups (93.1% 91.2%, log-rank =0.327).

CONCLUSIONS

Thoraco-laparoscopic transmediastinal esophagectomy is a safe, effective, and minimally invasive alternative to the McKeown approach in selected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients. It provides superior perioperative outcomes and enhanced recovery without compromising short-term oncologic efficacy.

摘要

背景

食管鳞状细胞癌仍是中国的一项重大健康负担,手术切除是根治性治疗的主要手段。传统的微创麦克尤恩食管切除术(MIE-McKeown)虽然在肿瘤学上有效,但需要经胸入路和单肺通气,常导致较高的术后发病率。胸腹腔镜经纵隔食管切除术已成为一种新的替代方法,可能会降低这些风险,同时保持肿瘤学的完整性。

方法

进行了一项回顾性队列研究,纳入268例可切除的胸段中下段食管鳞状细胞癌患者(临床分期I-III期),其中131例行经纵隔食管切除术,137例行MIE-McKeown手术。评估的结果包括手术时间、术中出血量、淋巴结收获量、并发症情况、恢复指标、生活质量(欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织QLQ-C30量表)和6个月无病生存率(DFS)。采用t检验、χ²检验和多因素逻辑回归进行统计学比较。

结果

经纵隔食管切除术组的手术时间明显更短(197.2±25.9对286.5±32.1分钟,<0.001),出血量减少(155.4±40.2对260.7±65.1毫升,<0.001)。经纵隔食管切除术组的经口进食时间(4.6±1.1对6.2±1.3天,<0.001)、引流持续时间(3.8±0.5对4.4±0.7天,<0.001)和住院时间(9.3±1.8对11.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5148/12399402/41159601926b/fonc-15-1644505-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5148/12399402/a9a4955bd437/fonc-15-1644505-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5148/12399402/c4a2a6334b8c/fonc-15-1644505-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5148/12399402/06c6c35decdf/fonc-15-1644505-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5148/12399402/9f4151c2fccd/fonc-15-1644505-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5148/12399402/41159601926b/fonc-15-1644505-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5148/12399402/a9a4955bd437/fonc-15-1644505-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5148/12399402/c4a2a6334b8c/fonc-15-1644505-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5148/12399402/06c6c35decdf/fonc-15-1644505-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5148/12399402/9f4151c2fccd/fonc-15-1644505-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5148/12399402/41159601926b/fonc-15-1644505-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative evaluation of transmediastinal and minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: perioperative and oncologic outcomes.经纵隔与微创McKeown食管癌切除术治疗食管癌的比较评估:围手术期及肿瘤学结局
Front Oncol. 2025 Aug 18;15:1644505. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1644505. eCollection 2025.
2
McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy under discontinuous spontaneous ventilating anesthesia by laryngeal mask: a retrospective non-inferiority cohort study.喉罩间断自主通气麻醉下的麦基翁微创食管切除术:一项回顾性非劣效性队列研究
J Thorac Dis. 2025 Jul 31;17(7):5014-5023. doi: 10.21037/jtd-2024-2272. Epub 2025 Jul 29.
3
Impact of preoperative diastolic dysfunction on short-term outcomes following robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE).术前舒张功能障碍对机器人辅助微创食管切除术(RAMIE)短期预后的影响。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Aug 1;19(1):442. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02624-7.
4
[Short-term outcomes of the McKeown esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal cancer: a multiple-center study].[麦克唐纳食管癌切除术治疗胸段食管癌的短期疗效:一项多中心研究]
Khirurgiia (Mosk). 2025(8):6-14. doi: 10.17116/hirurgia20250816.
5
Oncological outcomes of thoracic duct preservation and resection for esophageal carcinoma based on an understanding of its surgical microanatomy in the era of minimally invasive esophagectomy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy.基于对微创食管癌切除术和新辅助化疗时代胸导管手术微观解剖学的理解,食管癌胸导管保留与切除的肿瘤学结局
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2025 Aug;51(8):110062. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110062. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
6
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
7
The impact of postoperative atrial fibrillation on complications and mortality following Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.食管癌Ivor Lewis食管切除术后房颤对并发症及死亡率的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):22305. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06239-8.
8
Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.微创与开放食管癌切除术治疗癌症的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Minerva Chir. 2009 Apr;64(2):121-33.
9
Current status of laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer patients: a systematic review of the literature.食管癌患者腹腔镜经裂孔食管切除术的现状:文献系统评价
Dis Esophagus. 2017 Jan 1;30(1):1-7. doi: 10.1111/dote.12477.
10
Technical feasibility and oncological outcomes of robotic esophagectomy compared with conventional thoracoscopic esophagectomy for clinical T3 or T4 locally advanced esophageal cancer: a propensity-matched analysis.机器人食管切除术与传统胸腔镜食管切除术治疗 T3 或 T4 局部进展期食管癌的技术可行性和肿瘤学结果:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jul;38(7):3590-3601. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10872-1. Epub 2024 May 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Outcomes After McKeown and Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for Lower Third Esophageal Cancer.麦克尤恩(McKeown)术式与艾弗·刘易斯(Ivor Lewis)术式治疗食管下段癌的疗效比较
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2025 Apr;16(2):465-471. doi: 10.1007/s13193-023-01770-4. Epub 2023 May 25.
2
[Comparison of clinical outcomes between Ivor-Lewis and Mckeown esophagectomy for middle or lower esophageal cancer].[Ivor-Lewis与McKeown食管切除术治疗中下段食管癌的临床结局比较]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2025 Mar 23;47(3):262-268. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112152-20230713-00010.
3
Learning curve for robot-assisted Mckeown esophagectomy in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer.
胸段食管癌患者机器人辅助麦克基翁食管切除术的学习曲线
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2025 Mar;51(3):109516. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.109516. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
4
Milestones in Surgical Complication Reporting: Clavien-Dindo Classification 20 Years and Comprehensive Complication Index 10 Years.外科并发症报告的里程碑:Clavien-Dindo 分类 20 年和综合并发症指数 10 年。
Ann Surg. 2024 Nov 1;280(5):763-771. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006471. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
5
Long-term survival analysis of robotic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.机器人食管癌切除术的长期生存分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2024 Oct 28;37(11). doi: 10.1093/dote/doae054.
6
Occurrence and recovery of vocal cord paralysis after minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy, risk factors, and clinical outcome.微创 McKeown 食管切除术后面瘫的发生与恢复、危险因素和临床结果。
Surgery. 2024 Sep;176(3):713-720. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2024.05.020. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
7
Decoding the Clavien-Dindo Classification: Artificial Intelligence (AI) as a Novel Tool to Grade Postoperative Complications.解读Clavien-Dindo分类法:人工智能作为一种评估术后并发症的新型工具
Ann Surg. 2024 Jun 17. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006399.
8
Comparison of clinical outcomes of robotic-assisted and video-assisted esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.机器人辅助与视频辅助食管癌切除术的临床结局比较。
J Cancer Res Ther. 2024 Jan 1;20(1):410-416. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_2518_22. Epub 2023 May 3.
9
Predictive Value of Nutritional Risk for All-Cause Death and Functional Outcomes in Chinese Elderly Patients with Acute Stroke: A 3-Year Follow-Up Study.营养风险对中国老年急性脑卒中患者全因死亡和功能结局的预测价值:一项 3 年随访研究。
Clin Interv Aging. 2024 Jan 17;19:109-118. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S447038. eCollection 2024.
10
Comparison of substernal and posterior mediastinal route of reconstruction after minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.比较微创食管癌根治术后胸骨后和后纵隔入路重建。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Jan 6;409(1):27. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03215-6.