• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Comparison of Outcomes After McKeown and Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for Lower Third Esophageal Cancer.麦克尤恩(McKeown)术式与艾弗·刘易斯(Ivor Lewis)术式治疗食管下段癌的疗效比较
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2025 Apr;16(2):465-471. doi: 10.1007/s13193-023-01770-4. Epub 2023 May 25.
2
The impact of postoperative atrial fibrillation on complications and mortality following Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.食管癌Ivor Lewis食管切除术后房颤对并发症及死亡率的影响。
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):22305. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06239-8.
3
Comparison of double-layered scallop-shaped anastomosis and circular stapled anastomosis in Ivor-Lewis surgery for esophageal and EGJ cancer: a retrospective cohort study.双层扇贝形吻合术与圆形吻合器吻合术在Ivor-Lewis食管癌和食管胃交界部癌手术中的比较:一项回顾性队列研究
BMC Cancer. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):1035. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14437-w.
4
Impact of anastomotic leak vs pneumonia on failure to rescue after transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer.食管癌经胸切除术后吻合口漏与肺炎对未能挽救生命的影响。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Mar;29(3):101936. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.101936. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
5
Chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy plus surgery for esophageal cancer.食管癌的化疗放疗与化疗放疗联合手术治疗对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Aug 22;8(8):CD010511. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010511.pub2.
6
Impact of Anastomotic Leaks on Long-Term Survival in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Following McKeown Esophagectomy: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.吻合口漏对McKeown食管癌切除术后食管鳞状细胞癌患者长期生存的影响:一项倾向评分匹配分析
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Apr 8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17206-y.
7
Esophagectomy in patients with liver cirrhosis: systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes.肝硬化患者的食管切除术:短期结局的系统评价和荟萃分析
Updates Surg. 2025 Jan;77(1):143-152. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-02060-6. Epub 2024 Dec 24.
8
Decreasing Complications After Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy: Is a Totally Minimally Invasive Approach the Solution?降低Ivor-Lewis食管癌切除术后并发症:完全微创方法是解决之道吗?
J Surg Oncol. 2025 Aug;132(2):308-316. doi: 10.1002/jso.70011. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
9
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.
10
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.拓扑替康治疗卵巢癌的临床有效性和成本效益的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of transmediastinal and minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: perioperative and oncologic outcomes.经纵隔与微创McKeown食管癌切除术治疗食管癌的比较评估:围手术期及肿瘤学结局
Front Oncol. 2025 Aug 18;15:1644505. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1644505. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognostic Factors for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated with Neoadjuvant Docetaxel/Cisplatin/5-Fluorouracil Followed by Surgery.新辅助多西他赛/顺铂/氟尿嘧啶治疗后手术治疗食管鳞癌的预后因素。
Oncology. 2019;97(6):348-355. doi: 10.1159/000502342. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
2
Management of anastomotic leaks following esophagectomy: when to intervene?食管癌切除术后吻合口漏的管理:何时进行干预?
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Jan;11(1):131-137. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.12.13.
3
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.全球癌症统计数据 2018:GLOBOCAN 对全球 185 个国家/地区 36 种癌症的发病率和死亡率的估计。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
4
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Surgery Versus Surgery Alone for Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus (NEOCRTEC5010): A Phase III Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Clinical Trial.新辅助放化疗联合手术对比单纯手术治疗局部进展期食管鳞癌(NEOCRTEC5010):一项 III 期、多中心、随机、开放标签临床试验。
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Sep 20;36(27):2796-2803. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.79.1483. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
5
Patterns of recurrence in oesophageal cancer following oesophagectomy in the era of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.新辅助化疗时代食管癌切除术后的复发模式
BJS Open. 2018 Mar 15;1(6):182-190. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.30. eCollection 2017 Dec.
6
McKeown or Ivor Lewis totally minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction: systematic review and meta-analysis.麦克尤恩或艾弗·刘易斯式完全微创食管癌和胃食管交界癌切除术:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Thorac Dis. 2017 Jul;9(Suppl 8):S826-S833. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.03.173.
7
A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.微创食管切除术围手术期并发症的标准化比较:Ivor Lewis 与 McKeown 术式。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan;32(1):204-211. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5660-4. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
8
Patterns and Outcomes of Recurrent Esophageal Cancer After Curative Esophagectomy.根治性食管切除术后复发性食管癌的模式与结局
World J Surg. 2017 Sep;41(9):2337-2344. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4024-5.
9
Survival benefit of surgery to patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.手术治疗食管鳞癌患者的生存获益。
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 6;7:46139. doi: 10.1038/srep46139.
10
Improved Functional Results After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Intrathoracic Versus Cervical Anastomosis.微创食管切除术后功能结果的改善:胸内吻合与颈部吻合的比较。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2017 Jan;103(1):267-273. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.07.010. Epub 2016 Sep 24.

麦克尤恩(McKeown)术式与艾弗·刘易斯(Ivor Lewis)术式治疗食管下段癌的疗效比较

Comparison of Outcomes After McKeown and Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for Lower Third Esophageal Cancer.

作者信息

Kumar Naveen, Mandal Amitabha, Bhoriwal Sandeep, Deo S V S, Bharati Sachidanand Jee, Kumar Sunil

机构信息

Department of Surgical Oncology, DR BRAIRCH, Room-244, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, 110029 India.

Department of Onco-Anaesthesia, DR BRAIRCH, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Indian J Surg Oncol. 2025 Apr;16(2):465-471. doi: 10.1007/s13193-023-01770-4. Epub 2023 May 25.

DOI:10.1007/s13193-023-01770-4
PMID:40337041
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12052654/
Abstract

The commonly performed surgical procedures for esophageal cancer are McKeown and Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. The Ivor Lewis esophagectomy is mainly performed for lower esophageal cancer. Herein, we analyzed both procedures performed for lower esophageal cancer to look for perioperative and survival outcomes. The surgical data was retrieved from the computerized database, and the patients operated on for lower esophageal cancer from 2014 to 2019 were included. Both procedures were analyzed for demographic details, perioperative outcomes, complication rate, and overall and disease-free survivals. A total of 90 patients undergoing esophagectomy for lower esophageal cancer. RLN palsy and anastomotic leak rate were higher in the McKeown group. The estimated 5-year OS was 49% and 58.3% in the McKeown and Ivor Lewis groups, respectively, whereas the estimated 5-year DFS was 41% and 63.9%. In the Ivor Lewis group, on comparing both histological subtypes, the estimated 5-year OS was 74% and 26.3% ( < 0.05) whereas the DFS was 74.5% and 42% ( = 0.07) for SCC and adenocarcinoma, respectively. This study did not find a significant difference in the perioperative as well as survival outcomes comparing McKeown esophagectomy with the Ivor Lewis procedure for lower third esophageal cancer. A prospective trial is warranted to see the difference.

摘要

食管癌常见的手术方式是麦克尤恩(McKeown)食管切除术和艾弗·刘易斯(Ivor Lewis)食管切除术。艾弗·刘易斯食管切除术主要用于治疗下段食管癌。在此,我们分析了这两种用于治疗下段食管癌的手术方式,以探寻围手术期和生存结果。手术数据从计算机数据库中获取,纳入了2014年至2019年接受下段食管癌手术的患者。对这两种手术方式的人口统计学细节、围手术期结果、并发症发生率以及总生存率和无病生存率进行了分析。共有90例患者接受了下段食管癌食管切除术。麦克尤恩组的喉返神经麻痹和吻合口漏发生率较高。麦克尤恩组和艾弗·刘易斯组的估计5年总生存率分别为49%和58.3%,而估计5年无病生存率分别为41%和63.9%。在艾弗·刘易斯组中,比较两种组织学亚型,鳞状细胞癌和腺癌的估计5年总生存率分别为74%和26.3%(<0.05),而无病生存率分别为74.5%和42%(=0.07)。本研究未发现麦克尤恩食管切除术与艾弗·刘易斯手术治疗食管下段癌在围手术期和生存结果上有显著差异。有必要进行一项前瞻性试验来观察差异。