Suppr超能文献

用于轻度认知障碍心理评估的类人机器人:从评估到人工智能驱动的数据预测系统的未来

Humanoid robots for psychological assessment in mild cognitive impairment: from evaluation to the future of AI-driven data prediction systems.

作者信息

Formica Caterina, Giambò Fabio Mauro, Latella Desiree, Bonanno Lilla, Lombardo Marco, Tomarchio Orazio, Marra Angela, Alagna Antonella, Bonanno Carmen, Quartarone Angelo, Marino Silvia

机构信息

IRCCS Centro Neurolesi "Bonino Pulejo", Messina, Italy.

Behavior Labs srl, Catania, Italy.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 19;16:1579626. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1579626. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer's Disease (AD), are increasingly prevalent, emphasizing the need for early diagnosis and effective intervention. This study explores the feasibility of using the humanoid robot to administer cognitive assessments for Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI). Specifically, it evaluates the usability, accuracy, and patient experience of robot-administered cognitive testing compared to traditional assessments conducted by neuropsychologists.

METHODS

A total of 100 MCI patients were randomly assigned to two groups: one undergoing the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) with and the other receiving the same test administered by a neuropsychologist. After that participants were submitted to a Satisfaction Questionnaire (SQ) designed to assess their emotional and experiential response to the testing procedure, whether administered by a human or a robot.

RESULTS

The intergroup analysis (EG vs. CG) reveals significant differences in age ( = 0.003) and Total SQ ( = 0.01), and in SQ2 (  = 9.76; df = 1;  = 0.002), SQ4 (  = 5.02; df = 1;  = 0.02), SQ5 (  = 25.35; df = 1;  < 0.001), SQ6 (  = 7.68; df = 1;  = 0.006) and SQ7 (  = 7.56; df = 1;  = 0.006). Results indicate no significant differences in MMSE scores between the two groups, suggesting comparable cognitive evaluation accuracy. However, participants assessed by reported lower frustration levels and higher satisfaction (90% vs. 40%) compared to those tested by a neuropsychologist. Additionally, 92% of patients in the robot-assisted group expressed willingness to retake the test in the same manner, indicating high acceptability and engagement.

DISCUSSION

These findings suggest that robot-assisted cognitive assessments may enhance patient comfort and accessibility to neuropsychological testing. The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) further supports diagnostic accuracy and predictive potential, offering promising avenues for early intervention in neurodegenerative diseases.

摘要

引言

诸如阿尔茨海默病(AD)等神经退行性疾病日益普遍,这凸显了早期诊断和有效干预的必要性。本研究探讨了使用人形机器人对轻度认知障碍(MCI)进行认知评估的可行性。具体而言,它评估了机器人辅助认知测试与神经心理学家进行的传统评估相比的可用性、准确性和患者体验。

方法

总共100名MCI患者被随机分为两组:一组接受简易精神状态检查表(MMSE)测试,另一组接受由神经心理学家进行的相同测试。之后,参与者要填写一份满意度问卷(SQ),该问卷旨在评估他们对测试过程(无论是由人还是机器人进行)的情绪和体验反应。

结果

组间分析(实验组与对照组)显示,在年龄(p = 0.003)和总SQ(p = 0.01)以及SQ2(p = 9.76;自由度 = 1;p = 0.002)、SQ4(p = 5.02;自由度 = 1;p = 0.02)、SQ5(p = 25.35;自由度 = 1;p < 0.001)、SQ6(p = 7.68;自由度 = 1;p = 0.006)和SQ7(p = 7.56;自由度 = 1;p = 0.006)方面存在显著差异。结果表明两组之间的MMSE分数没有显著差异,这表明认知评估准确性相当。然而,与由神经心理学家测试的参与者相比,由机器人测试的参与者报告的沮丧程度较低且满意度较高(分别为90%和40%)。此外,机器人辅助组中92%的患者表示愿意以相同方式再次接受测试,这表明接受度和参与度很高。

讨论

这些发现表明,机器人辅助认知评估可能会提高患者对神经心理测试的舒适度和可及性。人工智能(AI)的整合进一步支持了诊断准确性和预测潜力,为神经退行性疾病的早期干预提供了有前景的途径。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6267/12402807/a94520ffbb5c/fpsyg-16-1579626-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验