• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

代顿儿童医院社区卫生工作者干预措施对降低儿科哮喘患者急诊就诊率和住院率的效果。

Effectiveness of Community Health Worker Intervention at Dayton Children's Hospital at Decreasing Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalization Rates for Pediatric Asthma Patients.

作者信息

Evans Geoffrey, Franson Shannon, Salem Jessica, Pullins Mekayla, Copher Synthia, Lear Kimberly, Evans Daniel A

机构信息

Dayton Children's Hospital, OH, USA.

Kettering Health Network, OH, USA.

出版信息

J Prim Care Community Health. 2025 Jan-Dec;16:21501319251358571. doi: 10.1177/21501319251358571. Epub 2025 Sep 4.

DOI:10.1177/21501319251358571
PMID:40905542
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12411699/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether asthma interventions completed by the community health workers (CHWs) at Dayton Children's Hospital decrease the rate of Emergency Department (ED) visits and hospitalizations.

METHODS

The data was chosen from the CHW patient population that met the inclusion criteria of at least 1 hospitalization/ED visit or Primary Care Provider referral in the twelve months prior to intervention during 2019 to 2020. The visit rates from 12 months before and after intervention were analyzed with Markov Chain Monte Carlo where the likelihood was assumed to be Poisson.

RESULTS

The number of ED visits decreased by 2 to 4 visits ( < 1e-5) per year per patient on average. This was an 83% decrease in the number of ED visits a year for the total patient population. Hospitalization rates also saw a decrease of 0.1 to 1.5 admissions ( = .006) per year per patient. This showed an overall 77% reduction in hospitalizations for the total patient population.

摘要

目的

确定代顿儿童医院的社区卫生工作者(CHW)完成的哮喘干预措施是否能降低急诊科(ED)就诊率和住院率。

方法

数据选自2019年至2020年干预前十二个月内符合至少1次住院/急诊科就诊或初级保健提供者转诊纳入标准的CHW患者群体。采用马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗方法分析干预前后12个月的就诊率,假设可能性为泊松分布。

结果

平均每位患者每年的急诊科就诊次数减少2至4次(<1e - 5)。这使全体患者群体的年度急诊科就诊次数减少了83%。住院率也出现下降,每位患者每年减少0.1至1.5次入院(P = 0.006)。这表明全体患者群体的住院率总体降低了77%。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f58c/12411699/58e516da838f/10.1177_21501319251358571-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f58c/12411699/3ff6bda0ae6e/10.1177_21501319251358571-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f58c/12411699/beea395f492d/10.1177_21501319251358571-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f58c/12411699/58e516da838f/10.1177_21501319251358571-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f58c/12411699/3ff6bda0ae6e/10.1177_21501319251358571-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f58c/12411699/beea395f492d/10.1177_21501319251358571-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f58c/12411699/58e516da838f/10.1177_21501319251358571-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of Community Health Worker Intervention at Dayton Children's Hospital at Decreasing Emergency Department Visits and Hospitalization Rates for Pediatric Asthma Patients.代顿儿童医院社区卫生工作者干预措施对降低儿科哮喘患者急诊就诊率和住院率的效果。
J Prim Care Community Health. 2025 Jan-Dec;16:21501319251358571. doi: 10.1177/21501319251358571. Epub 2025 Sep 4.
2
Pediatric Hospitalizations and Emergency Department Visits Related to Mental Health Conditions and Self-Harm.儿科住院治疗和与心理健康状况及自伤有关的急诊就诊情况。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Oct 1;7(10):e2441874. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.41874.
3
Professional, structural and organisational interventions in primary care for reducing medication errors.在初级保健中采取专业、结构和组织干预措施以减少用药错误。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 4;10(10):CD003942. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003942.pub3.
4
Remote Patient Monitoring System for Polypathological Older Adults at High Risk for Hospitalization: Retrospective Cohort Study.针对具有多种疾病且有高住院风险的老年患者的远程患者监测系统:回顾性队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 14;27:e71527. doi: 10.2196/71527.
5
Emergency department visits for children identified as at risk of mental and behavioral conditions in the United States: an analysis of the 2019 NHIS data.美国针对被确定有精神和行为状况风险儿童的急诊科就诊情况:对2019年美国国家健康访谈调查数据的分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 May 2;25(1):636. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12792-9.
6
Association between a mobile team intervention in Swedish municipal home care and the effect on emergency department visits and hospitalizations among older adults.瑞典市政家庭护理中流动团队干预措施与老年人急诊就诊及住院情况影响之间的关联。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 May 10;25(1):674. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12843-1.
7
Trends in cannabis-attributable hospitalizations and emergency department visits: data from the Canadian Substance Use Costs and Harms Study (2007-2020).因大麻导致的住院和急诊就诊趋势:来自加拿大物质使用成本与危害研究(2007 - 2020年)的数据。
Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can. 2025 Jun;45(6):265-276. doi: 10.24095/hpcdp.45.6.01.
8
One-year emergency department visits for children < 18 years of age, associated factors and frequency of primary general practitioner or pediatrician visits before: a French observational study (2018-19).18 岁以下儿童一年内在急诊就诊的情况、相关因素以及就诊前初级全科医生或儿科医生的就诊频率:一项法国观察性研究(2018-19 年)。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Mar 13;25(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02328-1.
9
Cost Analysis of the PARENT Trial of Community Health Workers in Early Childhood Preventive Care: A Secondary Analysis of a Cluster-Randomized Clinical Trial.社区卫生工作者在幼儿期预防保健中的PARENT试验成本分析:一项整群随机临床试验的二次分析
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2522732. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.22732.
10
Personalised asthma action plans for adults with asthma.针对成年哮喘患者的个性化哮喘行动计划。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 10;4(4):CD011859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011859.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of the home-based educational intervention on health outcomes among primarily Hispanic children with asthma: a quasi-experimental study.基于家庭的教育干预对主要为西班牙裔哮喘儿童健康结果的影响:一项准实验研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jul 9;19(1):912. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7272-5.
2
The Economic Burden of Pediatric Asthma in the United States: Literature Review of Current Evidence.美国儿科哮喘的经济负担:现有证据的文献综述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Feb;37(2):155-167. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0726-2.
3
Solutions for Asthma Disparities.
哮喘差异的解决方案。
Pediatrics. 2017 Mar;139(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2546. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
4
Addressing asthma and obesity in children with community health workers: proof-of-concept intervention development.通过社区卫生工作者解决儿童哮喘和肥胖问题:概念验证干预措施的开发
BMC Pediatr. 2016 Dec 1;16(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s12887-016-0745-0.
5
Health disparities in asthma.哮喘方面的健康差异。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 May 15;185(10):1033-5. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201202-0350ED.
6
Public health interventions for asthma: an umbrella review, 1990-2010.哮喘的公共卫生干预措施:1990-2010 年的伞式综述。
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Apr;42(4):403-10. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.11.016.
7
Community health workers and environmental interventions for children with asthma: a systematic review.社区卫生工作者与针对哮喘儿童的环境干预措施:一项系统评价
J Asthma. 2009 Aug;46(6):564-76. doi: 10.1080/02770900902912638.
8
The Seattle-King County Healthy Homes Project: a randomized, controlled trial of a community health worker intervention to decrease exposure to indoor asthma triggers.西雅图-金县健康家园项目:一项关于社区卫生工作者干预措施以减少室内哮喘诱发因素暴露的随机对照试验。
Am J Public Health. 2005 Apr;95(4):652-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.042994.