Kushner Bradley S, Attaar Mikhail, Majumder Arnab, Blatnik Jeffrey
Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Campus Box 8109, Saint Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2025 Sep 4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-12056-x.
Large abdominal wall defects are increasingly repaired robotically using bilateral component separation and myofascial release. Existing studies on complication rates and operative variables fail to capture the patient experience, creating a gap in our understanding of how transversus abdominis releases (TAR) impact quality of life (QoL). Using two validated hernia-specific tools, the Hernia-Related Quality-of-life Survey (HerQLes) and the Carolinas Comfort Scale (CCS), we compared improvements in patient-reported outcomes between the two approaches.
We prospectively enrolled patients undergoing elective bilateral Open (O-TAR) or Robotic (R-TAR) TAR between 2019 and 2023. HerQLes scores 21 days preoperatively and 7, 30, and 180 days postoperatively were collected, as were CCS scores 7, 30, and 180 days postoperative. The primary outcome measure was the mean percent change in HerQLes and CCS scores from pre- to postoperative assessments.
A total of 99 patients consented to participate, with final analysis including those who completed at least one survey: 49 O-TAR and 26 R-TAR. Initial HerQLes scores were significantly higher in the O-TAR cohort (62.95 vs. 48.72, p = 0.001), but both cohorts reported similar total average scores at 6 months (31.4 vs. 24.6, p = 0.29). Mean percent changes in HerQLes scores post-surgery were comparable between groups at 7, 30, and 180 days. Similarly, there were no significant differences in mean percent changes in CCS scores at 30 and 180 days compared to 1-week post-surgery.
Large abdominal wall defects pose QoL restraints on patients, especially those not candidates for minimally invasive repairs. Our data suggest that patients who undergo either open or robotic TAR have significant improvement in reported quality of life. While surgeons should continue to use patient and hernia factors to determine whether patients are candidates for O-TAR or R-TAR, surgeons can assure patients they are likely to have significant improvements in their QOL 6 months after surgery.
越来越多的人采用双侧成分分离和肌筋膜松解术,通过机器人技术修复大面积腹壁缺损。现有的关于并发症发生率和手术变量的研究未能涵盖患者体验,这使我们在了解腹横肌松解术(TAR)如何影响生活质量(QoL)方面存在差距。我们使用两种经过验证的特定于疝气的工具,即疝气相关生活质量调查(HerQLes)和卡罗莱纳舒适度量表(CCS),比较了两种手术方法在患者报告结局方面的改善情况。
我们前瞻性地纳入了2019年至2023年间接受择期双侧开放式(O-TAR)或机器人辅助(R-TAR)TAR手术的患者。收集术前21天以及术后7天、30天和180天的HerQLes评分,以及术后7天、30天和180天的CCS评分。主要结局指标是术前至术后评估中HerQLes和CCS评分的平均变化百分比。
共有99名患者同意参与,最终分析纳入了至少完成一项调查的患者:49例O-TAR患者和26例R-TAR患者。O-TAR队列的初始HerQLes评分显著更高(62.95对48.72,p = 0.001),但两个队列在6个月时报告的总平均分相似(31.4对24.6,p = 0.29)。两组在术后7天、30天和180天的HerQLes评分平均变化百分比相当。同样,与术后1周相比,术后30天和180天的CCS评分平均变化百分比也没有显著差异。
大面积腹壁缺损对患者的生活质量构成限制,尤其是那些不适合微创修复的患者。我们的数据表明,接受开放式或机器人辅助TAR手术的患者在报告的生活质量方面有显著改善。虽然外科医生应继续根据患者和疝气因素来确定患者是否适合O-TAR或R-TAR,但外科医生可以向患者保证,他们在术后6个月的生活质量可能会有显著改善。