Moini Cyrus, Monchi Mehran, Ramamourthy Umamaheswari, Awede Romuald, Cabot Bénédicte, Hraiech Kmar, Jochmans Sébastien
Department of Cardiology, Groupe Hospitalier Sud Ile de France, 270 Avenue Marc Jacquet, Melun, 77000, France.
Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Groupe Hospitalier Sud Ile de France, 270 Avenue Marc Jacquet, Melun, 77000, France.
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2025 Sep 4. doi: 10.1007/s11239-025-03174-3.
In intermediate high-risk pulmonary embolism (PE), the role of thrombolysis remains debated with a disagreement between European and American guidelines. Expected benefits are counterbalanced by increased hemorrhagic events with full-dose fibrinolysis. In these patients, half-dose thrombolysis may have similar effects with less complications. We have hypothesized that half-dose thrombolysis compared to anticoagulation alone may reduce hypoxemia duration and hospital length of stay. We have performed a 6 years' retrospective study in 2 Emergency Departments of French hospitals. One practiced fibrinolysis in intermediate risk PE (tPA 50 mg/2 h) and the other did not. We used logistic regression and propensity score matching to assess the effect of a thrombolysis strategy. 473 patients had a diagnosis of acute PE during the study period. 110 (23%) patients with intermediate risk PE met the inclusion criteria. After propensity score matching, 30 patients with thrombolysis therapy were compared to 30 control patients. The duration of oxygen therapy was shorter in the thrombolysis group (3 days, interquartile range 2 to 4) than in the control group (8 days, interquartile range 3 to 11; p = 0.0003). There was no significant difference between groups regarding pulmonary, cardiac, and hemorrhagic complications. The rates of treatment failure, defined by death or persistent hypotension requiring vasopressors, were not significantly different between the 2 groups (2% vs. 6%). Compared to anticoagulation alone, half-dose thrombolysis in intermediate risk PE is associated with a significantly shorter duration of hypoxemia.
在中高危肺栓塞(PE)中,溶栓的作用仍存在争议,欧美指南之间存在分歧。全剂量纤维蛋白溶解增加出血事件,抵消了预期的益处。在这些患者中,半剂量溶栓可能有相似效果且并发症更少。我们推测,与单纯抗凝相比,半剂量溶栓可能会缩短低氧血症持续时间和住院时间。我们在法国医院的2个急诊科进行了一项为期6年的回顾性研究。其中一个科室对中危PE患者进行溶栓治疗(组织型纤溶酶原激活剂50mg/2小时),另一个科室则不进行。我们使用逻辑回归和倾向得分匹配来评估溶栓策略的效果。在研究期间,473例患者被诊断为急性PE。110例(23%)中危PE患者符合纳入标准。经过倾向得分匹配后,将30例接受溶栓治疗的患者与30例对照患者进行比较。溶栓组的氧疗时间(3天,四分位间距2至4天)比对照组(8天,四分位间距3至11天;p = 0.0003)短。两组在肺部、心脏和出血并发症方面无显著差异。两组中由死亡或持续低血压需要血管升压药定义的治疗失败率无显著差异(2%对6%)。与单纯抗凝相比,中危PE患者的半剂量溶栓与显著缩短的低氧血症持续时间相关。