Babi Marc A, Lishen Irina, Louis Barbara Pierre, Woodbury Katelyn, Kennedy Anthony, Abuzeid Fouad, Nouh Amre
Department of Neurology, Cleveland Clinic Florida/Martin Health, Port Saint Lucie, FL, United States.
Department of Neurology, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, United States.
Front Neurol. 2025 Aug 20;16:1580539. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1580539. eCollection 2025.
Current guidelines recommend against the routine use of seizure prophylaxis in acute spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH).
The goal of this study is to evaluate if the use of prophylactic levetiracetam resulted in reduced incidence of seizure, morbidity, and length of stay, compared to patients who did not receive prophylactic levetiracetam.
This retrospective chart review includes patients admitted with ICH at Cleveland Clinic Florida Martin Health from January 2019 to October 2022.
The primary outcome was the incidence of seizure during the first 7 days of admission. Secondary outcomes include intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, measured in days.
A total of 160 patients were included in this study, 93 in the levetiracetam group. The primary outcome of clinical seizure incidence within 7 days of ICH diagnosis was observed in five patients, all of whom were in the prophylactic levetiracetam group, though this did not reach statistical significance (5% vs. 0%; = 0.075). In adjusted analysis, levetiracetam showed a non-significant protective trend (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.13-3.79). The median length of hospital stay and ICU stay were both longer in the prophylactic levetiracetam group (5 days vs. 3 days; < 0.001 and 2 days vs. 1 day; = 0.001, respectively). However, in adjusted analyses, these differences were not statistically significant.
The routine use of seizure prophylaxis with levetiracetam did not result in a significant reduction in early seizure incidence, and in unadjusted analyses, the prophylaxis group had longer ICU and hospital stays. However, these differences were not significant after adjustment for key clinical confounders. Randomized controlled trials need to be conducted to determine whether seizure prophylaxis with levetiracetam contributes to worse outcomes.
当前指南不建议在急性自发性脑出血(sICH)中常规使用癫痫预防措施。
本研究的目的是评估与未接受预防性左乙拉西坦的患者相比,使用预防性左乙拉西坦是否能降低癫痫发病率、发病率和住院时间。
这项回顾性图表审查纳入了2019年1月至2022年10月在佛罗里达州克利夫兰诊所马丁健康中心因脑出血入院的患者。
主要结局是入院后前7天内癫痫的发病率。次要结局包括重症监护病房和住院时间,以天数衡量。
本研究共纳入160例患者,左乙拉西坦组93例。在脑出血诊断后7天内临床癫痫发作发生率的主要结局在5例患者中观察到,所有这些患者均在预防性左乙拉西坦组,尽管这未达到统计学显著性(5%对0%;P = 0.075)。在调整分析中,左乙拉西坦显示出无显著意义的保护趋势(OR 0.71,95%CI 0.13 - 3.79)。预防性左乙拉西坦组的住院中位数和重症监护病房住院时间均更长(分别为5天对3天;P < 0.001和2天对1天;P = 0.001)。然而,在调整分析中,这些差异无统计学显著性。
常规使用左乙拉西坦进行癫痫预防并未导致早期癫痫发病率显著降低,在未调整分析中,预防组的重症监护病房和住院时间更长。然而,在对关键临床混杂因素进行调整后,这些差异并不显著。需要进行随机对照试验以确定左乙拉西坦预防癫痫是否会导致更差的结局。