Panuganti Veerendra Kumar, Kumar Madala Pavan, Ramalingayya Grandhi Venkata, Varma Alluri Chandrasekhar, Mohammad Javeed, Rao Kssvv Sanyasi, Reddy Dundigalla Mamatha
Clinical Affairs Department, Shilpa Medicare Limited, Nacharam Unit, Hyderabad, IND.
Bioanalytical Department, Shilpa Medicare Limited, Nacharam Unit, Hyderabad, IND.
Cureus. 2025 Aug 3;17(8):e89309. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89309. eCollection 2025 Aug.
Introduction Oral dutasteride has demonstrated superiority over finasteride in treating androgenetic alopecia (AGA). We have developed a novel topical dutasteride formulation, which has shown promising efficacy, safety, and tolerability in preclinical studies. The present study objective is to compare the efficacy and safety of dutasteride topical solutions (0.01%, 0.02%, and 0.05% w/v) with placebo and oral finasteride (1 mg/day) in AGA males. Methods In this phase II study, 135 AGA males (20-60 years of age) were randomized to receive dutasteride topical solution (0.01%, 0.02%, 0.05% w/v), finasteride (1 mg), or placebo daily for 24 weeks. The primary endpoint was target area hair count (TAHC) within 1 cm at the vertex at week 24. Secondary endpoints included TAHC at week 12 and target area hair width (TAHW), male hair growth questionnaire (MHGQ) score, and investigator global photography assessment (GPA) at week 12 and week 24. Results Dutasteride topical solution demonstrated a dose-dependent increase in TAHC and TAHW vs placebo at week 24 (p≤0.01). The 0.05% dutasteride solution significantly improved TAHC vs finasteride at week 24 (p=0.0083). More patients in the 0.05% dutasteride group achieved a GPA score of ≥+2 and an MHGQ score ≤ 2 at week 24 than those on finasteride. No irritation was reported in active treatment groups. Dutasteride caused modest changes in serum testosterone/dihydrotestosterone, while finasteride caused moderate changes. Conclusion Dutasteride topical solution (0.05% w/v) demonstrated to be more efficacious than finasteride (1 mg/day) in treating male AGA.
引言 口服度他雄胺在治疗雄激素性脱发(AGA)方面已显示出优于非那雄胺的效果。我们研发了一种新型局部用度他雄胺制剂,该制剂在临床前研究中已显示出有前景的疗效、安全性和耐受性。本研究的目的是比较度他雄胺局部用溶液(0.01%、0.02%和0.05% w/v)与安慰剂及口服非那雄胺(1毫克/天)在AGA男性患者中的疗效和安全性。
方法 在这项II期研究中,135名年龄在20至60岁的AGA男性患者被随机分为接受度他雄胺局部用溶液(0.01%、0.02%、0.05% w/v)、非那雄胺(1毫克)或安慰剂,每日一次,共24周。主要终点是第24周时头顶1厘米范围内的目标区域毛发计数(TAHC)。次要终点包括第12周时的TAHC、目标区域毛发宽度(TAHW)、男性头发生长问卷(MHGQ)评分以及第12周和第24周时研究者整体摄影评估(GPA)。
结果 在第24周时,度他雄胺局部用溶液与安慰剂相比,TAHC和TAHW呈剂量依赖性增加(p≤0.01)。在第24周时,0.05%度他雄胺溶液与非那雄胺相比,TAHC有显著改善(p = 0.0083)。在第24周时,0.05%度他雄胺组中达到GPA评分≥ +2且MHGQ评分≤ 2的患者比非那雄胺组更多。在活性治疗组中未报告有刺激现象。度他雄胺引起血清睾酮/双氢睾酮的适度变化,而非那雄胺引起中度变化。
结论 度他雄胺局部用溶液(0.05% w/v)在治疗男性AGA方面显示出比非那雄胺(1毫克/天)更有效。