Suppr超能文献

桑给巴尔类风湿关节炎的治疗:一项比较传统、生物和靶向合成改善病情抗风湿药物的成本效益研究。

Treating rheumatoid arthritis in Zanzibar: a cost effectiveness study comparing conventional, biologic, and targeted-synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs.

作者信息

Said Sanaa S, Kühl Melf-Jakob, Fevang Bjorg-Tilde Svanes, Nystad Tone Wikene, Johansson Kjell Arne

机构信息

School of Health and Medical Sciences, The State University of Zanzibar, Zanzibar, Tanzania.

Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Bergen Center for Ethics and Priority Settings (BCEPS), Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Aug 20;12:1618493. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1618493. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic inflammatory joint disease with low treatment coverage in sub-Saharan Africa. Effective treatment strategies are available. We aimed to evaluate the cost effectiveness of six disease modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) treat-to-target treatment strategies for patients with rheumatoid arthritis in Zanzibar. A Markov model was used to calculate the cost-effectiveness of various DMARD strategies in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis over a 3-year period. A health-provider perspective was used and only outpatient costs were considered. The Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) was utilized for measurement of efficacy and values were obtained from literature. Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) were obtained from 122 patients attending the rheumatology clinic at Mnazi Mmoja Hospital. Data on costs were obtained from the central medical stores and hospital administration. Treatment strategies were given in sequential approach based on treat to target goals of therapy. This included methotrexate monotherapy, methotrexate + sulfasalazine + hydroxychloroquine, methotrexate followed by one or two biologic/targeted-synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs). Probabilistic and one way sensitivity analysis were performed. Scenario analysis was undertaken comparing drug prices from India and Scandinavia. Costs of therapy/patient/3 years ranged from USD 634 for methotrexate monotherapy and USD 5011 for methotrexate and two consecutive b/tsDMARDs. The highest and lowest effects were 2.209 and 2.079 QALYs gained from methotrexate therapy + two consecutive b/tsDMARDs and methotrexate monotherapy, respectively. From a healthcare provider perspective methotrexate monotherapy was the cost-effective option at a willingness to pay of USD 282. Pairwise comparison also favored methotrexate monotherapy as the feasible option. We found that increasing the willingness to pay led to a change in the most acceptable option from methotrexate monotherapy to methotrexate followed by b/tsDMARD. Methotrexate monotherapy is the cost-effective option for the management of rheumatoid arthritis in Zanzibar. Other options may be feasible if the willingness to pay threshold is increased or the drug prices are lowered, particularly for the b/tsDMARDs.

摘要

类风湿性关节炎是一种慢性炎症性关节疾病,在撒哈拉以南非洲地区的治疗覆盖率较低。有效的治疗策略是存在的。我们旨在评估六种改善病情抗风湿药物(DMARD)达标治疗策略对桑给巴尔类风湿性关节炎患者的成本效益。采用马尔可夫模型计算各种DMARD策略在3年期间治疗类风湿性关节炎的成本效益。采用医疗服务提供者的视角,仅考虑门诊费用。使用临床疾病活动指数(CDAI)来衡量疗效,其数值来自文献。质量调整生命年(QALYs)来自姆纳齐莫贾医院风湿科门诊的122名患者。成本数据来自中央医疗用品商店和医院管理部门。治疗策略按照治疗达标目标以序贯方式给出。这包括甲氨蝶呤单药治疗、甲氨蝶呤+柳氮磺胺吡啶+羟氯喹,甲氨蝶呤之后使用一种或两种生物制剂/靶向合成DMARDs(b/tsDMARDs)。进行了概率分析和单向敏感性分析。进行了情景分析,比较了来自印度和斯堪的纳维亚的药品价格。每位患者3年的治疗费用从甲氨蝶呤单药治疗的634美元到甲氨蝶呤和两种连续的b/tsDMARDs治疗的5011美元不等。最高和最低效果分别是甲氨蝶呤治疗+两种连续的b/tsDMARDs和甲氨蝶呤单药治疗获得的2.209和2.079个QALYs。从医疗服务提供者的角度来看,在支付意愿为282美元时,甲氨蝶呤单药治疗是具有成本效益的选择。两两比较也支持甲氨蝶呤单药治疗是可行的选择。我们发现,提高支付意愿会导致最可接受的选择从甲氨蝶呤单药治疗变为甲氨蝶呤之后使用b/tsDMARD。甲氨蝶呤单药治疗是桑给巴尔类风湿性关节炎管理中具有成本效益的选择。如果提高支付意愿阈值或降低药品价格,特别是对于b/tsDMARDs,其他选择可能是可行的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ae29/12405486/e73c55a06ea9/fmed-12-1618493-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验