Mittal Gauri, Bisht Manisha, Pai Venkatesh S, Handu Shailendra
Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.
Internal Medicine and Clinical Immunology/Rheumatology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Rishikesh, IND.
Cureus. 2023 Feb 6;15(2):e34664. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34664. eCollection 2023 Feb.
Objective This study was conducted with the aim of evaluating the cost-effectiveness of and adherence to treatment in patients on disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in a tertiary care teaching hospital in Uttarakhand, India. Methodology This prospective observational study was conducted on 150 rheumatoid arthritis patients presenting to the Rheumatology Outpatient Department (OPD) receiving DMARD therapy (approval number AIIMS/IEC/18/160). The patients were followed up for an average of 10.7 weeks and received drugs in four regimens with methotrexate (MTX) (Regimen 1) having the least contribution with a mean of 46.05 Rs, methotrexate + hydroxychloroquine (MTX + HCQ) (Regimen 2) with 174.15 Rs, methotrexate + hydroxychloroquine + leflunomide (MTX + HCQ + Lef) (Regimen 3) with Rs 371.70, and methotrexate + hydroxychloroquine + leflunomide + biological DMARD adalimumab (MTX + HCQ + Lef + bDMARD adalimumab) (Regimen 4) with 17,349.4 Rs. The cost of drug therapy was assessed by calculating the cost of therapy per month for each patient, and adherence was assessed using the Morisky-Green-Levine Scale (MGLS) at the follow-up visit. Results The overall mean cost of DMARD treatment was 205.81 Rs. The overall DMARD therapy cost-effectiveness was Rs 878.14 for a unit change of Disease Activity Score (DAS28). The most cost-effective treatment came out to be Regimen 1 with the least cost of 290.9 Rs for a unit change of DAS28, and the least cost-effective was Regimen 4 with 65,661.8 Rs for a unit change of DAS28. At follow-up, among all subjects of the study, 49 (32.7%) subjects showed high adherence, 71 (47.3%) subjects showed medium adherence, and 30 (20%) subjects showed low adherence. Accordingly, the maximum number of participants fell in the category of medium adherence, i.e., 71 (47.4%). Conclusion Our study concluded that the cost burden varied according to the number of DMARDs being given to the patient. The double-drug therapy of methotrexate + hydroxychloroquine had a maximum "high adherence." On a whole, the majority of patients had "medium adherence" to therapy.
目的 本研究旨在评估印度北阿坎德邦一家三级护理教学医院中,类风湿关节炎(RA)患者接受改善病情抗风湿药(DMARD)治疗的成本效益及治疗依从性。方法 本前瞻性观察性研究对150名到风湿病门诊接受DMARD治疗的类风湿关节炎患者进行(批准文号:AIIMS/IEC/18/160)。患者平均随访10.7周,接受四种治疗方案的药物,其中甲氨蝶呤(MTX)(方案1)贡献最小,平均费用为46.05卢比,甲氨蝶呤+羟氯喹(MTX + HCQ)(方案2)为174.15卢比,甲氨蝶呤+羟氯喹+来氟米特(MTX + HCQ + Lef)(方案3)为371.70卢比,甲氨蝶呤+羟氯喹+来氟米特+生物DMARD阿达木单抗(MTX + HCQ + Lef + bDMARD阿达木单抗)(方案4)为17349.4卢比。通过计算每位患者每月的治疗费用来评估药物治疗成本,并在随访时使用Morisky - Green - Levine量表(MGLS)评估依从性。结果 DMARD治疗的总体平均成本为205.81卢比。疾病活动评分(DAS28)单位变化的DMARD治疗总体成本效益为878.14卢比。最具成本效益的治疗方案是方案1,DAS28单位变化的成本最低,为290.9卢比,最不具成本效益的是方案4,DAS28单位变化的成本为65661.8卢比。随访时,在所有研究对象中,49名(32.7%)受试者表现出高依从性,71名(47.3%)受试者表现出中等依从性,30名(20%)受试者表现出低依从性。因此,参与人数最多的类别是中等依从性,即71名(47.4%)。结论 我们的研究得出结论,成本负担因给予患者的DMARD数量而异。甲氨蝶呤+羟氯喹的双药治疗具有最高的“高依从性”。总体而言,大多数患者对治疗具有“中等依从性”。