Barth E, Rønningen H, Solheim L F
Acta Orthop Scand. 1985 Dec;56(6):491-5. doi: 10.3109/17453678508993042.
The mechanical strengths of the bone-implant interfaces of titanium coated with glass ceramic and pure titanium implants were compared. The glass ceramic had a chemical composition similar to 45S5F Bioglass. Cylindrical implants were placed in feline femurs. Six weeks later the strength of the fixation was tested using pull-out tests. Energy dispersive X-ray microanalysis was applied to pursue any possible relationship between mechanical strength and changes in elemental composition at the bone-implant interface. The ultimate shearing force for the pure titanium implants was higher than for the implants coated with glass ceramic. Also, the glass ceramic coating was partly degraded by the tissues. Evidently, the mechanical properties of the glass ceramic to bone interface were governed by some sort of chemical reaction that implied transfer of elements from the implant to bone. It appears that this reaction eventually will destroy the coating which makes this kind of material unsuitable for prosthesis fixation.
对涂覆有玻璃陶瓷的钛植入物和纯钛植入物的骨-植入物界面的机械强度进行了比较。该玻璃陶瓷的化学成分与45S5F生物玻璃相似。将圆柱形植入物植入猫的股骨中。六周后,使用拔出试验测试固定强度。应用能量色散X射线微分析来探究骨-植入物界面处机械强度与元素组成变化之间的任何可能关系。纯钛植入物的极限剪切力高于涂覆有玻璃陶瓷的植入物。此外,玻璃陶瓷涂层被组织部分降解。显然,玻璃陶瓷与骨界面的机械性能受某种化学反应支配,该反应意味着元素从植入物转移到骨中。看来这种反应最终会破坏涂层,这使得这种材料不适合用于假体固定。