Baldi Samantha, Lin Christopher, Li Jing, Frandsen Summer, Jones Emma, Palm Stephan, Greene Abigail, Taylor Joseph, Fox Michael, Siddiqi Shan
Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School.
Brigham and Women's Hospital.
Res Sq. 2025 Aug 27:rs.3.rs-7255101. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-7255101/v1.
Functional connectivity (FC) is increasingly used to measure target engagement following transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), but whether FC changes are specific to the TMS target remains unclear. We examined FC before and after TMS in patients with depression and anxiety (N=29) enrolled in a randomized trial targeting a dysphoric vs. anxiosomatic circuit. We tested whether: 1) TMS selectively modulated FC within the targeted circuit; 2) baseline TMS site FC to the targeted circuit predicted FC changes; 3) either metric correlated with symptom improvement. We found that: 1) FC decreased in both circuits, but effects were not clearly target-specific; 2) FC to the targeted circuit correlated with FC changes; 3) FC to the targeted circuit, not FC changes, correlated with symptom improvement. Results were driven by the anxiosomatic target group, likely due to heterogeneity in dysphoric circuit properties. These results have implications for using FC to target TMS and measure engagement.
功能连接性(FC)越来越多地用于测量经颅磁刺激(TMS)后的靶点参与情况,但FC变化是否特定于TMS靶点仍不清楚。我们在一项针对烦躁与焦虑躯体回路的随机试验中,对29名抑郁症和焦虑症患者进行了TMS前后的FC检查。我们测试了:1)TMS是否选择性地调节了目标回路内的FC;2)TMS位点到目标回路的基线FC是否预测了FC变化;3)这两个指标是否与症状改善相关。我们发现:1)两个回路中的FC均下降,但效果并非明显具有靶点特异性;2)到目标回路的FC与FC变化相关;3)到目标回路的FC而非FC变化与症状改善相关。结果由焦虑躯体靶点组驱动,可能是由于烦躁回路特性的异质性。这些结果对使用FC来靶向TMS并测量参与情况具有启示意义。