Ghent Experimental Psychiatry Laboratory, Department of Head and Skin, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; 4BRAIN Team, Department of Head and Skin, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium; Center for Care and Cure, Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Research Institute Brainclinics, Brainclinics Foundation, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Biol Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 15;95(6):553-563. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2023.09.009. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) treatments have gained considerable attention as potential therapeutic intervention for psychiatric disorders. The identification of reliable biomarkers for predicting clinical response to NIBS has been a major focus of research in recent years. Neuroimaging techniques, such as electroencephalography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), have been used to identify potential biomarkers that could predict response to NIBS. However, identifying clinically actionable brain biomarkers requires robustness. In this systematic review, we aimed to summarize the current state of brain biomarker research for NIBS in depression, focusing only on well-powered studies (N ≥ 88) and/or studies that aimed at independently replicating previous findings, either successfully or unsuccessfully. A total of 220 studies were initially identified, of which 18 MRI studies and 18 EEG studies met the inclusion criteria. All focused on repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment in depression. After reviewing the included studies, we found the following MRI and EEG biomarkers to be most robust: 1) functional MRI-based functional connectivity between the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and subgenual anterior cingulate cortex, 2) functional MRI-based network connectivity, 3) task-induced EEG frontal-midline theta, and 4) EEG individual alpha frequency. Future prospective studies should further investigate the clinical actionability of these specific EEG and MRI biomarkers to bring biomarkers closer to clinical reality.
非侵入性脑刺激 (NIBS) 治疗作为精神疾病的潜在治疗干预措施受到了广泛关注。近年来,识别预测 NIBS 临床反应的可靠生物标志物一直是研究的重点。神经影像学技术,如脑电图 (EEG) 和功能磁共振成像 (fMRI),已被用于识别可能预测 NIBS 反应的潜在生物标志物。然而,确定具有临床可操作性的大脑生物标志物需要稳健性。在这项系统评价中,我们旨在总结目前针对抑郁症的 NIBS 脑生物标志物研究的现状,仅关注有足够效力的研究(N ≥ 88)和/或旨在独立复制先前发现的研究,无论是成功还是失败。最初共确定了 220 项研究,其中 18 项 MRI 研究和 18 项 EEG 研究符合纳入标准。所有研究均专注于重复经颅磁刺激治疗抑郁症。在审查了纳入的研究后,我们发现以下 MRI 和 EEG 生物标志物最为稳健:1)背外侧前额叶皮质和扣带回前下皮质之间基于功能磁共振成像的功能连接,2)基于功能磁共振成像的网络连接,3)任务诱发的 EEG 额中线θ波,以及 4)EEG 个体阿尔法频率。未来的前瞻性研究应进一步研究这些特定的 EEG 和 MRI 生物标志物的临床可操作性,使生物标志物更接近临床现实。