Della Pepa Roberta, Palmieri Salvatore, Rocco Stefano, Pugliese Novella, Leone Aldo, Avilia Simona, Barone Marialucia, Rosamilio Rosa, Trastulli Fabio, De Novellis Danilo, Fontana Raffaele, Serio Bianca, Morini Denise, Esposito Lorenzo, De Fazio Laura, Spisso Roberta, Selleri Carmine, Califano Catello, Picardi Alessandra, Annunziata Mario, Pane Fabrizio
Hematology Unit, Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy.
Division of Hematology, AO "A. Cardarelli'' Hospital, Naples, Italy.
Ann Hematol. 2025 Sep 5. doi: 10.1007/s00277-025-06581-x.
Daratumumab combined with bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (Dara-VTD) is a highly effective induction therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). However, its impact on stem cell mobilization requires a critical evaluation. This study examines the effects of Dara-VTD on stem cell mobilization and collection outcomes. A multicenter retrospective study included 81 consecutive NDMM patients treated with Dara-VTD (from November 2021 to June 2023). Data on stem cell mobilization and collection were compared with 93 historical VTD patients. Mobilization regimens included cyclophosphamide (CTX), vinorelbine + CTX, and chemotherapy-free approaches, with plerixafor used as rescue therapy. Mobilization success was evaluated by CD34 + cell yield, additional agent use, and leukapheresis sessions required. The median CD34 + yield in the Dara-VTD group was 5.1 million cells/kg, with 96.3% of patients achieving > 2 × 10^6 cells/kg of body weight. Plerixafor use was significantly higher in the Dara-VTD group (56.2%) compared to VTD (4.3%), and CTX-based regimens showed superior mobilization efficacy (p = 0.01). Engraftment was faster in the Dara-VTD group, with median neutrophil and platelet recovery at 11 and 13 days, compared to 12 and 17 days in the VTD group (p < 0.05). Dara-VTD maintains the feasibility of ASCT, with comparable stem cell mobilization and collection outcomes to VTD. Mobilization success is influenced by individualized strategies, with CTX and plerixafor playing key roles in optimizing stem cell yield. Despite the challenges posed by daratumumab, stem cell mobilization remains effective, and Dara-VTD does not compromise the transplant process.
达雷妥尤单抗联合硼替佐米、沙利度胺和地塞米松(Dara-VTD)是一种对适合自体干细胞移植(ASCT)的新诊断多发性骨髓瘤(NDMM)患者非常有效的诱导疗法。然而,其对干细胞动员的影响需要进行严格评估。本研究考察了Dara-VTD对干细胞动员和采集结果的影响。一项多中心回顾性研究纳入了81例连续接受Dara-VTD治疗的NDMM患者(2021年11月至2023年6月)。将干细胞动员和采集数据与93例接受VTD治疗的历史对照患者进行比较。动员方案包括环磷酰胺(CTX)、长春瑞滨+CTX以及无化疗方案,普乐沙福用作挽救治疗。通过CD34+细胞产量、额外药物使用情况以及所需的白细胞分离术次数来评估动员成功率。Dara-VTD组的CD34+产量中位数为510万个细胞/千克,96.3%的患者达到>2×10^6个细胞/千克体重。与VTD组(4.3%)相比,Dara-VTD组普乐沙福的使用显著更高(56.2%),且基于CTX的方案显示出更好的动员效果(p = 0.01)。Dara-VTD组的植入更快,中性粒细胞和血小板恢复的中位数分别为11天和13天,而VTD组为12天和17天(p < 0.05)。Dara-VTD维持了ASCT的可行性,其干细胞动员和采集结果与VTD相当。动员成功受个体化策略影响,CTX和普乐沙福在优化干细胞产量方面发挥关键作用。尽管达雷妥尤单抗带来了挑战,但干细胞动员仍然有效,且Dara-VTD不会影响移植过程。