Suppr超能文献

经右肱动脉途径进行机械取栓治疗超急性期右前循环梗死的疗效

The efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy via right brachial approach for hyperacute right anterior circulation infarction.

作者信息

Noda Naoyuki

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital Organization Yokohama Medical Center, Japan.

出版信息

Neuroradiol J. 2025 Sep 5:19714009251373063. doi: 10.1177/19714009251373063.

Abstract

BackgroundMechanical thrombectomy (MT) is a well-established treatment for acute large-vessel occlusion. While the transfemoral approach (TFA) is the standard, it can be challenging in elderly patients with tortuous vasculature. The transbrachial approach (TBA) offers a shorter and more direct route but is associated with more puncture site complications. This study investigates the effectiveness and feasibility of TBA for right anterior circulation strokes.MethodsA total of 23 patients who underwent MT via TBA between September 2023 and January 2025 were retrospectively analyzed and compared with 23 patients treated via TFA from March 2021 to April 2023. Patient characteristics, procedural times, recanalization rates, and complications were evaluated.ResultsThe TBA group showed a shorter median puncture-to-guiding (PtoG) time (13 vs 16 min) and puncture-to-recanalization (PtoR) time (37 vs 52 min) compared to the TFA group. Successful recanalization (TICI ≥2b) was achieved in 95.7% of TBA cases versus 87.0% in TFA. One minor puncture site complication occurred in the TBA group. In rare instances, catheter kinking at the subclavian-CCA junction was observed. Sheathless technique was employed in most TBA cases to minimize puncture complications.ConclusionTBA is a feasible alternative for MT in right anterior circulation strokes, providing improved procedural efficiency. While associated with a higher rate of puncture complications, TBA offers a practical solution in cases where TFA or TRA may be technically challenging.

摘要

背景

机械取栓术(MT)是治疗急性大血管闭塞的成熟方法。虽然经股动脉途径(TFA)是标准方法,但对于血管迂曲的老年患者可能具有挑战性。经肱动脉途径(TBA)提供了更短、更直接的路径,但与更多穿刺部位并发症相关。本研究调查了TBA治疗右侧前循环卒中的有效性和可行性。

方法

回顾性分析了2023年9月至2025年1月期间通过TBA接受MT治疗的23例患者,并与2021年3月至2023年4月期间通过TFA治疗的23例患者进行比较。评估了患者特征、手术时间、再通率和并发症。

结果

与TFA组相比,TBA组的中位穿刺至置入导引导管时间(PtoG)(13分钟对16分钟)和穿刺至再通时间(PtoR)(37分钟对52分钟)更短。TBA组95.7%的病例实现了成功再通(TICI≥2b),而TFA组为87.0%。TBA组发生了1例轻微穿刺部位并发症。在罕见情况下,观察到锁骨下动脉-颈总动脉交界处导管扭结。大多数TBA病例采用了无鞘技术以尽量减少穿刺并发症。

结论

TBA是右侧前循环卒中MT的可行替代方法,可提高手术效率。虽然与更高的穿刺并发症发生率相关,但在TFA或经桡动脉途径(TRA)可能存在技术挑战的情况下,TBA提供了一种实用的解决方案。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

6
Transradial access in acute ischemic stroke intervention.急性缺血性卒中介入治疗中的经桡动脉入路
J Neurointerv Surg. 2016 Mar;8(3):247-50. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011519. Epub 2015 Jan 5.
7
10
Contemporary management of postcatheterization pseudoaneurysms.导管插入术后假性动脉瘤的当代管理。
Circulation. 2007 May 22;115(20):2666-74. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.681973.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验