Suppr超能文献

孟加拉国接触者中的危险因素与麻风发病率:一项多层次分析。

Risk factors and leprosy incidence among contacts in Bangladesh: A multilevel analysis.

作者信息

Saha Unnati Rani, Chowdhury Abu Sufian, Roy Johan Chandra, Alam Khorshed, Nieboer Daan, Verbiest-Richardus Renate, Geluk Annemieke, Richardus Jan Hendrik

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

The Leprosy Mission International, Nilphamari, Bangladesh.

出版信息

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2025 Sep 5;19(9):e0013465. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0013465. eCollection 2025 Sep.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Maltalep trial in Bangladesh assessed whether single-dose rifampicin (SDR) given 8-12 weeks after bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination was able to prevent excess leprosy cases due to BCG in contacts of newly diagnosed leprosy patients. After previous publication of the two years follow-up results of the trial, we now review the results after five years. Furthermore, to better understand the long-term protective effects of BCG against leprosy, we conduct post-hoc in-depth secondary statistical analyses based on the prospective interventional (randomized) Maltalep trial and a non-interventional (non-randomized) cohort study that was conducted simultaneously in the same project area.

METHODOLOGY

The Maltalep trial is a single center, cluster-randomized controlled trial consisting of two arms. In one arm, SDR was given 8-12 weeks after BCG vaccination (SDR+), in the other arm no SDR was given after BCG revaccination (SDR-).

RESULTS

The Maltalep trial included 1,552 index patients. Of these, 14,986 eligible contacts were randomized into two arms SDR- and SDR+ of the trial. During the 5-year observation period, 95 and 100 new cases appeared among the contacts in two arms SDR- and SDR+ , respectively. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference in the leprosy incidence between the contacts of two arms of the trial. The non-intervention cohort included 554 index patients and 4,216 eligible contacts, with a total of 82 new leprosy cases appearing during the 5-year observation period. After adjustment for risk factors, the leprosy incidence was statistically significantly 1.70 [95% CI (1.03-2.80)] times higher in the contacts of the non-intervention cohort as compared to the contacts in the Maltalep trial. In the Maltalep trial, adjusted for both observed and unobserved differences, SDR- arm contacts of MB, slit skin smear (SSS) positive, blood-related (brother/sister, child, parent), and 'blood-related other' to index patients had higher risks for leprosy (AOR 2.35; 95% CI: 1.20-4.60; AOR: 6.35; CI: 2.42-16.72; AOR: 4.34; 95% CI: 1.83-10.26 and AOR: 3.07; 95% CI: 1.37-7.90) compared to PB, SSS negative, and not blood-related index patients. Household members of index patients had an increased risk (AOR: 2.60; 95% CI: 1.30-7.27) for leprosy. In the SDR+ arm, leprosy incidences were statistically significantly less in the contacts of MB, SSS positive, and 'blood-related other' index patients as compared to the same kind of contacts in the SDR- arm. Leprosy incidence increased with age of contacts, with a peak at age group 45+ years (AOR:3.45; 95% CI: 1.44-8.23).

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

BCG vaccination of contacts is effective in preventing leprosy, overall there is no clear benefit of adding SDR after BCG to reduce the number of excess leprosy cases after vaccination. SDR after BCG, however, appears effective to prevent leprosy in contacts of MB patients, smear positive index patients, and second degree blood-related contacts of index patients. Genetic relationship is a more profound risk factor for leprosy in contacts than being a household contact only. Leprosy incidence is clustered at levels of index patients and contacts, and this should be taken into account when assessing the effect of risk factors.

摘要

背景

在孟加拉国进行的Maltalep试验评估了在卡介苗(BCG)接种8 - 12周后给予单剂量利福平(SDR)是否能够预防新诊断麻风患者的接触者中因卡介苗接种导致的额外麻风病例。在先前发表该试验的两年随访结果后,我们现在回顾五年后的结果。此外,为了更好地理解卡介苗对麻风的长期保护作用,我们基于前瞻性干预(随机)Maltalep试验和在同一项目地区同时进行的非干预(非随机)队列研究进行事后深入的二次统计分析。

方法

Maltalep试验是一项单中心、整群随机对照试验,由两个组组成。在一组中,在卡介苗接种8 - 12周后给予SDR(SDR +),在另一组中,卡介苗复种后不给予SDR(SDR -)。

结果

Maltalep试验纳入了1552名索引患者。其中,14986名符合条件的接触者被随机分为试验的SDR -组和SDR +组。在5年观察期内,SDR -组和SDR +组的接触者中分别出现了95例和100例新病例。总体而言,试验两组接触者的麻风发病率在统计学上无显著差异。非干预队列包括554名索引患者和4216名符合条件的接触者,在5年观察期内共出现82例新的麻风病例。在调整风险因素后,与Maltalep试验中的接触者相比,非干预队列接触者的麻风发病率在统计学上显著高出1.70 [95%可信区间(1.03 - 2.80)]倍。在Maltalep试验中,在调整了观察到的和未观察到的差异后,与PB、涂片阴性且与索引患者无血缘关系的患者相比,MB、皮肤涂片(SSS)阳性、与索引患者有血缘关系(兄弟姐妹、子女、父母)以及“其他有血缘关系者”的SDR -组接触者患麻风的风险更高(比值比2.35;可信区间:1.20 - 4.60;比值比:6.35;可信区间:2.42 - 16.72;比值比:4.34;可信区间:1.83 - 10.26和比值比:3.07;可信区间:1.37 - 7.90)。索引患者的家庭成员患麻风的风险增加(比值比:2.60;可信区间:1.30 - 7.27)。在SDR +组中,与SDR -组中相同类型的接触者相比,MB、SSS阳性以及“其他有血缘关系者”索引患者的接触者中麻风发病率在统计学上显著更低。麻风发病率随接触者年龄增加而升高,在45岁及以上年龄组达到峰值(比值比:3.45;可信区间:1.44 - 8.23)。

结论与建议

对接触者进行卡介苗接种可有效预防麻风,总体而言,在卡介苗接种后添加SDR对减少接种后额外麻风病例数并无明显益处。然而,卡介苗接种后给予SDR似乎对预防MB患者的接触者、涂片阳性索引患者的接触者以及索引患者的二级血缘关系接触者中的麻风有效。遗传关系是接触者中比仅作为家庭接触者更重要的麻风危险因素。麻风发病率在索引患者和接触者层面存在聚集现象,在评估危险因素的影响时应予以考虑。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c5e1/12412996/c561408669e2/pntd.0013465.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验