• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

动作子采样支持在大型动作空间中进行策略压缩。

Action subsampling supports policy compression in large action spaces.

作者信息

Liu Shuze, Gershman Samuel Joseph

机构信息

PhD Program in Neuroscience, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Department of Psychology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS Comput Biol. 2025 Sep 5;21(9):e1013444. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013444. eCollection 2025 Sep.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013444
PMID:40911647
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12422588/
Abstract

Real-world decision-making often involves navigating large action spaces with state-dependent action values, taxing the limited cognitive resources at our disposal. While previous studies have explored cognitive constraints on generating action consideration sets or refining state-action mappings (policy complexity), their interplay remains underexplored. In this work, we present a resource-rational framework for policy compression that integrates both constraints, offering a unified perspective on decision-making under cognitive limitations. Through simulations, we characterize the suboptimality arising from reduced action consideration sets and reveal the complex interaction between policy complexity and action consideration set size in mitigating this suboptimality. We then use such normative insight to explain empirically observed phenomena in option generation, including the preferential sampling of generally valuable options and increased correlation in responses across contexts under cognitive load. We further validate the framework's predictions through a contextual multi-armed bandit experiment, showing how humans flexibly adapt their action consideration sets and policy complexity to maintain near-optimality in a task-dependent manner. Our study demonstrates the importance of accounting for fine-grained resource constraints in understanding human cognition, and highlights the presence of adaptive metacognitive strategies even in simple tasks.

摘要

现实世界中的决策通常涉及在具有状态依赖动作值的大型动作空间中进行导航,这会消耗我们有限的认知资源。虽然先前的研究已经探讨了认知对生成动作考虑集或完善状态-动作映射(策略复杂性)的限制,但它们之间的相互作用仍未得到充分探索。在这项工作中,我们提出了一个用于策略压缩的资源合理框架,该框架整合了这两种限制,为认知限制下的决策提供了统一的视角。通过模拟,我们刻画了因动作考虑集减少而产生的次优性,并揭示了策略复杂性和动作考虑集大小在减轻这种次优性方面的复杂相互作用。然后,我们利用这种规范性见解来解释在选项生成中实证观察到的现象,包括对一般有价值选项的优先采样以及在认知负荷下不同情境中反应之间增加的相关性。我们通过一个情境多臂老虎机实验进一步验证了该框架的预测,展示了人类如何灵活地调整他们的动作考虑集和策略复杂性,以任务依赖的方式保持接近最优性。我们的研究证明了在理解人类认知时考虑细粒度资源限制的重要性,并强调了即使在简单任务中也存在适应性元认知策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddb1/12422588/83a381c55103/pcbi.1013444.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddb1/12422588/df2c24789eec/pcbi.1013444.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddb1/12422588/35669a8f7414/pcbi.1013444.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddb1/12422588/c931e1f5b210/pcbi.1013444.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddb1/12422588/f48cb18b34f7/pcbi.1013444.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddb1/12422588/83a381c55103/pcbi.1013444.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddb1/12422588/df2c24789eec/pcbi.1013444.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddb1/12422588/35669a8f7414/pcbi.1013444.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddb1/12422588/c931e1f5b210/pcbi.1013444.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddb1/12422588/f48cb18b34f7/pcbi.1013444.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddb1/12422588/83a381c55103/pcbi.1013444.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Action subsampling supports policy compression in large action spaces.动作子采样支持在大型动作空间中进行策略压缩。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2025 Sep 5;21(9):e1013444. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013444. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.成年自闭症患者的就业生活经历:系统检索与综述
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):495-509. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0114. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Remote and digital services in UK general practice 2021-2023: the Remote by Default 2 longitudinal qualitative study synopsis.2021 - 2023年英国全科医疗中的远程和数字服务:“默认远程”2纵向定性研究概要
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Sep;13(31):1-49. doi: 10.3310/QQTT4411.
5
Policy shaping based on the learned preferences of others accounts for risky decision-making under social observation.基于对他人学习偏好的政策塑造解释了社会观察下的风险决策。
Elife. 2025 Sep 12;13:RP102228. doi: 10.7554/eLife.102228.
6
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
7
Plug-and-play use of tree-based methods: consequences for clinical prediction modeling.基于树的方法的即插即用:对临床预测模型的影响。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2025 Aug;184:111834. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111834. Epub 2025 May 19.
8
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.选择观察等待或主动监测作为治疗方法的成年人的经历:一项定性系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270.
9
Short-Term Memory Impairment短期记忆障碍
10
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice.审核与反馈:对专业实践的影响
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 25;3(3):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub4.

引用本文的文献

1
Neural and behavioral signatures of policy compression in cognitive control.认知控制中策略压缩的神经和行为特征
bioRxiv. 2025 May 7:2025.05.06.652533. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.06.652533.

本文引用的文献

1
Time and memory costs jointly determine a speed-accuracy trade-off and set-size effects.时间和记忆成本共同决定了速度-准确性权衡和集合大小效应。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2025 Jun;154(6):1611-1627. doi: 10.1037/xge0001760. Epub 2025 Apr 7.
2
Human decision making balances reward maximization and policy compression.人类决策平衡了奖励最大化和策略压缩。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Apr 26;20(4):e1012057. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012057. eCollection 2024 Apr.
3
Meta-learned models of cognition.元认知学习模型。
Behav Brain Sci. 2023 Nov 23;47:e147. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X23003266.
4
Rate-distortion theory of neural coding and its implications for working memory.神经编码的率失真理论及其对工作记忆的启示。
Elife. 2023 Jul 12;12:e79450. doi: 10.7554/eLife.79450.
5
Mental control of uncertainty.对不确定性的心理控制。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2023 Jun;23(3):465-475. doi: 10.3758/s13415-022-01034-8. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
6
Generating Options and Choosing Between Them Depend on Distinct Forms of Value Representation.生成选项并在它们之间进行选择取决于不同形式的价值表征。
Psychol Sci. 2021 Nov;32(11):1731-1746. doi: 10.1177/09567976211005702. Epub 2021 Sep 27.
7
Temporal and state abstractions for efficient learning, transfer, and composition in humans.人类高效学习、迁移和组合的时间和状态抽象。
Psychol Rev. 2021 Jul;128(4):643-666. doi: 10.1037/rev0000295. Epub 2021 May 20.
8
Computational evidence for hierarchically structured reinforcement learning in humans.人类强化学习的分层结构计算证据。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Nov 24;117(47):29381-29389. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1912330117.
9
Origin of perseveration in the trade-off between reward and complexity.在奖励和复杂性的权衡中坚持的起源。
Cognition. 2020 Nov;204:104394. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104394. Epub 2020 Jul 14.
10
How We Know What Not To Think.我们如何知道不该想什么。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Dec;23(12):1026-1040. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.09.007. Epub 2019 Oct 31.