• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对不确定性的心理控制。

Mental control of uncertainty.

机构信息

Department of Psychology and Center for Brain Science, Harvard University, MA, Cambridge, USA.

出版信息

Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2023 Jun;23(3):465-475. doi: 10.3758/s13415-022-01034-8. Epub 2022 Sep 27.

DOI:10.3758/s13415-022-01034-8
PMID:36168079
Abstract

Can you reduce uncertainty by thinking? Intuition suggests that this happens through the elusive process of attention: if we expend mental effort, we can increase the reliability of our sensory data. Models based on "rational inattention" formalize this idea in terms of a trade-off between the costs and benefits of attention. This paper surveys the origin of these models in economics, their connection to rate-distortion theory, and some of their recent applications to psychology and neuroscience. We also report new data from a numerosity judgment task in which we manipulate performance incentives. Consistent with rational inattention, people are able to improve performance on this task when incentivized, in part by increasing the reliability of their sensory data.

摘要

思考能否减少不确定性?直觉表明,这种情况是通过注意力这一难以捉摸的过程实现的:如果我们投入精力,就可以提高感官数据的可靠性。基于“理性忽视”的模型从注意力的成本和收益权衡的角度对这一观点进行了形式化。本文综述了这些模型在经济学中的起源、与率失真理论的联系,以及它们在心理学和神经科学中的一些最新应用。我们还报告了一项数量判断任务的新数据,该任务中我们操纵了绩效激励。与理性忽视一致,当人们受到激励时,他们能够提高这项任务的表现,部分原因是提高了感官数据的可靠性。

相似文献

1
Mental control of uncertainty.对不确定性的心理控制。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2023 Jun;23(3):465-475. doi: 10.3758/s13415-022-01034-8. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
2
Towards an alternative to Benner's theory of expert intuition in nursing: a discussion paper.迈向护理领域中本纳专家直觉理论的替代方案:一篇讨论论文。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 Jan;45(1):129-39. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.01.005. Epub 2007 Mar 2.
3
The MBTI and social information processing: an incremental validity study.迈尔斯-布里格斯类型指标(MBTI)与社会信息加工:一项效标效度增量研究
J Pers Assess. 2002 Jun;78(3):432-50. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7803_04.
4
The role of causality in judgment under uncertainty.因果关系在不确定性判断中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2007 Aug;136(3):430-50. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.136.3.430.
5
Reconciling intuitive physics and Newtonian mechanics for colliding objects.协调碰撞物体的直觉物理和牛顿力学。
Psychol Rev. 2013 Apr;120(2):411-37. doi: 10.1037/a0031912. Epub 2013 Mar 4.
6
Intuition and rational decision-making in professional thinking: a false dichotomy?专业思维中的直觉与理性决策:一种错误的二分法?
J Adv Nurs. 1996 Oct;24(4):667-73. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1996.02413.x.
7
Between ignorance and truth: Partition dependence and learning in judgment under uncertainty.在无知与真理之间:不确定性判断中的划分依赖与学习
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Nov;32(6):1385-402. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.6.1385.
8
Expert judgment in climate science: How it is used and how it can be justified.气候科学中的专家判断:如何使用以及如何证明其合理性。
Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2023 Aug;100:32-38. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2023.05.005. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
9
Quantum Cognition.量子认知。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2022 Jan 4;73:749-778. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-033020-123501. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
10
Intuition versus rational thinking: psychological challenges in radiology and a potential solution.直觉与理性思维:放射科的心理挑战及潜在解决方案
J Am Coll Radiol. 2013 Jan;10(1):25-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2012.06.029.

引用本文的文献

1
Action subsampling supports policy compression in large action spaces.动作子采样支持在大型动作空间中进行策略压缩。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2025 Sep 5;21(9):e1013444. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013444. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Neural and behavioral signatures of policy compression in cognitive control.认知控制中策略压缩的神经和行为特征
bioRxiv. 2025 May 7:2025.05.06.652533. doi: 10.1101/2025.05.06.652533.
3
Computational basis of hierarchical and counterfactual information processing.分层与反事实信息处理的计算基础。

本文引用的文献

1
Rational inattention in mice.小鼠中的理性疏忽。
Sci Adv. 2022 Mar 4;8(9):eabj8935. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abj8935.
2
Value-driven attentional capture enhances distractor representations in early visual cortex.价值驱动的注意力捕获增强了早期视觉皮层中的分心物表示。
PLoS Biol. 2019 Aug 9;17(8):e3000186. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000186. eCollection 2019 Aug.
3
Mental labour.脑力劳动。
Nat Hum Behav. 2025 Jun 11. doi: 10.1038/s41562-025-02232-3.
4
Time and memory costs jointly determine a speed-accuracy trade-off and set-size effects.时间和记忆成本共同决定了速度-准确性权衡和集合大小效应。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2025 Jun;154(6):1611-1627. doi: 10.1037/xge0001760. Epub 2025 Apr 7.
5
Exploring the link of personality traits and tutors' instruction on critical thinking disposition: a cross-sectional study among Chinese medical graduate students.探索人格特质与导师对批判性思维倾向指导之间的联系:一项针对中国医学研究生的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 31;14(8):e082461. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082461.
6
Rational inattention in neural coding for economic choice.经济决策神经编码中的理性疏忽
bioRxiv. 2024 Sep 23:2024.09.20.614193. doi: 10.1101/2024.09.20.614193.
7
Resource-rational psychopathology.资源理性精神病理学。
Behav Neurosci. 2024 Aug;138(4):221-234. doi: 10.1037/bne0000600. Epub 2024 May 16.
Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Dec;2(12):899-908. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0401-9. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
4
Adaptive allocation of human visual working memory capacity during statistical and categorical learning.统计学习和分类学习过程中人类视觉工作记忆容量的适应性分配
J Vis. 2019 Feb 1;19(2):11. doi: 10.1167/19.2.11.
5
Cost-Benefit Arbitration Between Multiple Reinforcement-Learning Systems.多强化学习系统的成本效益仲裁。
Psychol Sci. 2017 Sep;28(9):1321-1333. doi: 10.1177/0956797617708288. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
6
Distinct Motivational Effects of Contingent and Noncontingent Rewards.偶然性奖励和非偶然性奖励的不同激励效果。
Psychol Sci. 2017 Jul;28(7):1016-1026. doi: 10.1177/0956797617693326. Epub 2017 May 10.
7
Toward a Rational and Mechanistic Account of Mental Effort.迈向对心理努力的理性与机械论解释
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2017 Jul 25;40:99-124. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-072116-031526. Epub 2017 Mar 31.
8
Effects of Payoff and Probability on Recall of Multisymbol Displays.回报与概率对多符号显示记忆的影响。
J Gen Psychol. 1969 Jan;80(1):81-92. doi: 10.1080/00221309.1969.9711274.
9
How motivation and reward learning modulate selective attention.动机和奖励学习如何调节选择性注意。
Prog Brain Res. 2016;229:325-342. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
10
When Does Model-Based Control Pay Off?基于模型的控制何时能带来回报?
PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Aug 26;12(8):e1005090. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005090. eCollection 2016 Aug.