Rizzo Alessandro, Zayed Anas, Vitale Elsa, Buti Sebastiano, Takeshita Hideki, Crabb Simon, Roviello Giandomenico, Seront Emmanuel, Tapia Jose Carlos, Scagliarini Sarah, Popovic Lazar, Kopp Ray Manneh, Abahssain Halima, Rizzo Mimma, Monteiro Fernando Sabino Marques, Massafra Raffaella, Brunetti Oronzo, Santini Daniele, Ürün Yüksel, Montironi Rodolfo, Mollica Veronica, Massari Francesco, Soares Andrey, Santoni Matteo
S.S.D. C.O.r.O. Bed Management Presa in Carico, TDM, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Viale Orazio Flacco 65, 70124, Bari, Italy.
Department of Internal Medicine, King Hussein Cancer Center, Amman, Jordan.
Clin Exp Metastasis. 2025 Sep 6;42(5):52. doi: 10.1007/s10585-025-10374-x.
Recent years have seen the development and advent of novel combinatorial strategies based on immunotherapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) - based treatment has established itself as a mainstay in the treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). Herein, we aimed to validate the prognostic value of a previously developed score, the Prognostic Immunotherapy Score (PIS), including female sex, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG-PS) and liver metastases, in patients treated with pembrolizumab for advanced UC from the ARON-2 dataset. We retrospectively analyzed clinical data from Metastatic UC patients diagnosed at age ≥ 18 years. Patients progressing or recurring after platinum-based therapy were included, and treated with pembrolizumab from January 1st, 2016, to December 31st, 2023, in 68 oncological centers from 21 Countries. The Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate the median follow-up. Cox proportional hazard models were used to compare the multivariable effects on patients' survival and to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A survival receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was exploited in relation to OS and PFS in patients stratified by the presence of 0, 1 or ≥ 2 risk factors and OS with 0, 1 or ≥ 2 risk factors in patients stratified by age, tumor histology, site and time to metastatic disease. The comparison between subgroups was performed with the Fisher exact test. We included 1040 patients from the ARON-2 dataset. We further stratified patients based on the three previously published risk factors: female sex, ECOG-PS = 2 and liver metastases; 526 patients (51%) had 0 risk factors, 408 patients (39%) had 1 factor and 106 patients (10%) had ≥ 2 risk factors. At univariate and multivariate analyses, bone metastases, synchronous metastatic disease and our PIS model based on female sex, liver metastasis, and poor performance status were significantly associated with both OS and PFS. Our findings validate the PIS as a practical scoring model using sex, ECOG-PS, and liver metastasis to stratify survival outcomes in advanced urothelial carcinoma treated with pembrolizumab, supporting more personalized treatment decisions.
近年来,基于免疫疗法的新型联合策略不断发展并问世,基于免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)的治疗已成为转移性尿路上皮癌(UC)治疗的中流砥柱。在此,我们旨在验证先前开发的一种评分——预后免疫治疗评分(PIS)的预后价值,该评分包括女性、东部肿瘤协作组体能状态(ECOG-PS)和肝转移,用于评估ARON-2数据集中接受派姆单抗治疗的晚期UC患者。我们回顾性分析了年龄≥18岁的转移性UC患者的临床数据。纳入铂类治疗后进展或复发的患者,这些患者于2016年1月1日至2023年12月31日在来自21个国家的68个肿瘤中心接受派姆单抗治疗。采用Kaplan-Meier分析计算中位随访时间。使用Cox比例风险模型比较对患者生存的多变量影响,并计算风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI)。针对按0、1或≥2个风险因素分层的患者的总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)以及按年龄、肿瘤组织学、部位和转移疾病时间分层的患者中具有0、1或≥2个风险因素的OS进行生存接受者操作特征(ROC)分析。亚组之间的比较采用Fisher精确检验。我们纳入了ARON-2数据集中的1040例患者。我们根据先前公布的三个风险因素进一步对患者进行分层:女性、ECOG-PS = 2和肝转移;526例患者(51%)无风险因素,408例患者(39%)有1个因素,106例患者(10%)有≥2个风险因素。在单变量和多变量分析中,骨转移、同步转移性疾病以及我们基于女性、肝转移和体能状态差的PIS模型与OS和PFS均显著相关。我们的研究结果验证了PIS作为一种实用的评分模型,可利用性别、ECOG-PS和肝转移对接受派姆单抗治疗的晚期尿路上皮癌患者的生存结果进行分层,支持更个性化的治疗决策。