Gao Zhao, Wang Xiao-Yan, Song Tao, Shen Zhi-Gang, Wang Xiao-Yun, Wu Shi-Kai, Jin Xuan
Department of Medical Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China.
Department of Pharmacy, Jilin Cancer Hospital, Changchun 130012, Jilin Province, China.
World J Gastroenterol. 2025 Aug 7;31(29):109947. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i29.109947.
BACKGROUND: Targeted therapy combined with anti-programmed cell death 1 immunotherapy (TP) and trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) combined with bevacizumab (TB) are two common therapies for patients with late-line therapy in microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, it is still unclear which therapy can bring better prognosis. AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of TP TB as the late-line regimen for MSS mCRC in the real world. METHODS: This is a dual-center retrospective cohort study conducted in Peking University First Hospital and Jilin Cancer Hospital. Patients with MSS mCRC who had received at least the second line treatment were eligible. Propensity score (PS) would be calculated to balance the baseline characteristics of two cohorts. Progression-free survival (PFS) was set as the primary endpoint. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard model were used to evaluate PFS and to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Landmark analysis was performed to create segmented survival curves, studying the impact of treatment regimen on prognosis during different follow-up periods. RESULTS: Between July 2019 and March 2025 (data cutoff), 127 eligible patients were enrolled, with 88 and 39 patients assigned to the TP and TB cohorts, respectively, based on treatment allocation. At a global median follow-up of 9.73 months, the crude median PFS was 3.9 months (95%CI: 3.03-5.53) in the TP cohort 4.17 months (95%CI: 2.87-5.6) in the TB cohort, yielding a nonsignificant HR of 1.43 (95%CI: 0.94-2.18, = 0.092; TB as reference). Multivariate Cox regression analysis, adjusted for sex, age > 60 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, mutation, primary tumor location (left right), number of metastatic organs (liver/lung), and treatment line (≥ 3 line), demonstrated an adjusted HR of 1.23 (95%CI: 0.80-1.88, = 0.348). PS-based analyses using three methodologies: Inverse probability weighting, PS matching (post-matching = 55 30), and PS-adjusted multivariate Cox regression. These analyses revealed consistent nonsignificant trends favoring TB, with HRs for TP of 1.26 (95%CI: 0.76-2.10, = 0.077), 1.42 (95%CI: 0.87-2.34, = 0.164), and 1.26 (95%CI: 0.76-2.10, = 0.367), respectively. Notably, landmark PFS analyses at 90, 120, and 150 days demonstrated a significantly higher proportion of TP patients maintaining disease control beyond these timepoints ( = 0.048, 0.031, and 0.035, respectively), suggesting sustained clinical benefits in TP responders. CONCLUSION: TP and TB demonstrated similar PFS in both crude and PS-adjusted analyses. However, patients who derived benefits from TP therapy exceeding 90 days showed more sustained clinical advantages compared to TB. Our study suggests that for patients with MSS mCRC who respond to TP therapy in later-line treatments, this regimen could provide additional prolonged clinical benefits, which warrants further validation through large-scale cohort investigations.
背景:靶向治疗联合抗程序性细胞死亡蛋白1免疫疗法(TP)以及三氟尿苷/替匹嘧啶(TAS-102)联合贝伐珠单抗(TB)是微卫星稳定(MSS)转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者后线治疗的两种常用疗法。然而,仍不清楚哪种疗法能带来更好的预后。 目的:评估TP和TB作为MSS mCRC后线治疗方案在现实世界中的有效性和安全性。 方法:这是一项在北京大学第一医院和吉林省肿瘤医院进行的双中心回顾性队列研究。纳入至少接受过二线治疗的MSS mCRC患者。将计算倾向得分(PS)以平衡两个队列的基线特征。将无进展生存期(PFS)设定为主要终点。采用Kaplan-Meier法和Cox比例风险模型评估PFS并估计风险比(HRs)和95%置信区间(CIs)。进行标志性分析以绘制分段生存曲线,研究不同随访期治疗方案对预后的影响。 结果:从2019年7月至2025年3月(数据截止),共纳入127例符合条件的患者,根据治疗分配,分别有88例和39例患者被分配到TP组和TB组。在全球中位随访9.73个月时,TP组的粗中位PFS为3.9个月(95%CI:3.03 - 5.
World J Gastroenterol. 2025-6-28
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-2-6
CA Cancer J Clin. 2025
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2025-1
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2024-10
J Natl Cancer Cent. 2022-2-27
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2024-6
N Engl J Med. 2023-5-4