文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

靶向治疗联合免疫治疗:三氟尿苷/替匹嘧啶联合贝伐单抗作为转移性结直肠癌的晚期治疗方案

Targeted therapy combined with immunotherapy trifluridine/tipiracil with bevacizumab as late-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.

作者信息

Gao Zhao, Wang Xiao-Yan, Song Tao, Shen Zhi-Gang, Wang Xiao-Yun, Wu Shi-Kai, Jin Xuan

机构信息

Department of Medical Oncology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China.

Department of Pharmacy, Jilin Cancer Hospital, Changchun 130012, Jilin Province, China.

出版信息

World J Gastroenterol. 2025 Aug 7;31(29):109947. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i29.109947.


DOI:10.3748/wjg.v31.i29.109947
PMID:40809924
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12344350/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Targeted therapy combined with anti-programmed cell death 1 immunotherapy (TP) and trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) combined with bevacizumab (TB) are two common therapies for patients with late-line therapy in microsatellite stable (MSS) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, it is still unclear which therapy can bring better prognosis. AIM: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of TP TB as the late-line regimen for MSS mCRC in the real world. METHODS: This is a dual-center retrospective cohort study conducted in Peking University First Hospital and Jilin Cancer Hospital. Patients with MSS mCRC who had received at least the second line treatment were eligible. Propensity score (PS) would be calculated to balance the baseline characteristics of two cohorts. Progression-free survival (PFS) was set as the primary endpoint. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard model were used to evaluate PFS and to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Landmark analysis was performed to create segmented survival curves, studying the impact of treatment regimen on prognosis during different follow-up periods. RESULTS: Between July 2019 and March 2025 (data cutoff), 127 eligible patients were enrolled, with 88 and 39 patients assigned to the TP and TB cohorts, respectively, based on treatment allocation. At a global median follow-up of 9.73 months, the crude median PFS was 3.9 months (95%CI: 3.03-5.53) in the TP cohort 4.17 months (95%CI: 2.87-5.6) in the TB cohort, yielding a nonsignificant HR of 1.43 (95%CI: 0.94-2.18, = 0.092; TB as reference). Multivariate Cox regression analysis, adjusted for sex, age > 60 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, mutation, primary tumor location (left right), number of metastatic organs (liver/lung), and treatment line (≥ 3 line), demonstrated an adjusted HR of 1.23 (95%CI: 0.80-1.88, = 0.348). PS-based analyses using three methodologies: Inverse probability weighting, PS matching (post-matching = 55 30), and PS-adjusted multivariate Cox regression. These analyses revealed consistent nonsignificant trends favoring TB, with HRs for TP of 1.26 (95%CI: 0.76-2.10, = 0.077), 1.42 (95%CI: 0.87-2.34, = 0.164), and 1.26 (95%CI: 0.76-2.10, = 0.367), respectively. Notably, landmark PFS analyses at 90, 120, and 150 days demonstrated a significantly higher proportion of TP patients maintaining disease control beyond these timepoints ( = 0.048, 0.031, and 0.035, respectively), suggesting sustained clinical benefits in TP responders. CONCLUSION: TP and TB demonstrated similar PFS in both crude and PS-adjusted analyses. However, patients who derived benefits from TP therapy exceeding 90 days showed more sustained clinical advantages compared to TB. Our study suggests that for patients with MSS mCRC who respond to TP therapy in later-line treatments, this regimen could provide additional prolonged clinical benefits, which warrants further validation through large-scale cohort investigations.

摘要

背景:靶向治疗联合抗程序性细胞死亡蛋白1免疫疗法(TP)以及三氟尿苷/替匹嘧啶(TAS-102)联合贝伐珠单抗(TB)是微卫星稳定(MSS)转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者后线治疗的两种常用疗法。然而,仍不清楚哪种疗法能带来更好的预后。 目的:评估TP和TB作为MSS mCRC后线治疗方案在现实世界中的有效性和安全性。 方法:这是一项在北京大学第一医院和吉林省肿瘤医院进行的双中心回顾性队列研究。纳入至少接受过二线治疗的MSS mCRC患者。将计算倾向得分(PS)以平衡两个队列的基线特征。将无进展生存期(PFS)设定为主要终点。采用Kaplan-Meier法和Cox比例风险模型评估PFS并估计风险比(HRs)和95%置信区间(CIs)。进行标志性分析以绘制分段生存曲线,研究不同随访期治疗方案对预后的影响。 结果:从2019年7月至2025年3月(数据截止),共纳入127例符合条件的患者,根据治疗分配,分别有88例和39例患者被分配到TP组和TB组。在全球中位随访9.73个月时,TP组的粗中位PFS为3.9个月(95%CI:3.03 - 5.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed53/12344350/15cef36d79d4/wjg-31-29-109947-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed53/12344350/190e82442964/wjg-31-29-109947-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed53/12344350/38017e567fba/wjg-31-29-109947-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed53/12344350/92bb45507be9/wjg-31-29-109947-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed53/12344350/fe9668d2195a/wjg-31-29-109947-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed53/12344350/15cef36d79d4/wjg-31-29-109947-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed53/12344350/190e82442964/wjg-31-29-109947-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed53/12344350/38017e567fba/wjg-31-29-109947-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed53/12344350/92bb45507be9/wjg-31-29-109947-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed53/12344350/fe9668d2195a/wjg-31-29-109947-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ed53/12344350/15cef36d79d4/wjg-31-29-109947-g005.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Targeted therapy combined with immunotherapy trifluridine/tipiracil with bevacizumab as late-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.

World J Gastroenterol. 2025-8-7

[2]
Real-world comparison of chemotherapy plus bevacizumab with or without immunotherapy as first-line therapy in colorectal cancer.

World J Gastroenterol. 2025-6-28

[3]
Chemotherapy plus bevacizumab with or without anti-programmed death 1 immunotherapy as the second-line therapy in colorectal cancer.

World J Gastroenterol. 2025-6-7

[4]
Health-related quality of life in patients with KRAS-mutated chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer treated with sotorasib plus panitumumab or standard of care (CodeBreaK 300): results from a phase 3, randomised clinical trial.

Lancet Oncol. 2025-8-11

[5]
Real world effectiveness of chemotherapy plus bevacizumab with immunotherapy in colorectal cancer.

Sci Rep. 2025-8-9

[6]
Biweekly dosing of trifluridine-tipiracil reduces rates of myelosuppression while maintaining efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Oncologist. 2025-5-8

[7]
Trifluridine-tipiracil plus bevacizumab versus trifluridine-tipiracil monotherapy for chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BMC Cancer. 2024-6-3

[8]
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018-2-6

[9]
Rechallenge therapy versus tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for advanced metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective study.

Sci Rep. 2025-2-4

[10]
Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of first- and second-line immunotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials.

Front Immunol. 2024

本文引用的文献

[1]
Cancer statistics, 2025.

CA Cancer J Clin. 2025

[2]
Late-line options for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a review and evidence-based algorithm.

Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2025-1

[3]
Third-line treatment and beyond in metastatic colorectal cancer: What do we have and what can we expect?

Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2024-10

[4]
Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2016.

J Natl Cancer Cent. 2022-2-27

[5]
Colon Cancer, Version 3.2024, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2024-6

[6]
Clinical and Molecular Features of Long-term Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Clin Cancer Res. 2023-11-1

[7]
Trifluridine-Tipiracil and Bevacizumab in Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

N Engl J Med. 2023-5-4

[8]
Safety and efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil in previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer: final results from the phase IIIb single-arm PRECONNECT study by duration of therapy.

BMC Cancer. 2023-1-27

[9]
Phase 1b/2 trial of fruquintinib plus sintilimab in treating advanced solid tumours: The dose-escalation and metastatic colorectal cancer cohort in the dose-expansion phases.

Eur J Cancer. 2023-3

[10]
Metastatic colorectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Ann Oncol. 2023-1

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索