• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Surgical Implications of Prior Inguinal Hernia Repair in Extraperitoneal Radical Prostatectomy.既往腹股沟疝修补术对腹膜外根治性前列腺切除术的手术影响
JSLS. 2025 Jul-Sep;29(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2025.00048. Epub 2025 Sep 3.
2
Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair.经腹腹膜前(TAPP)与完全腹膜外(TEP)腹腔镜技术治疗腹股沟疝修补术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 4;7(7):CD004703. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004703.pub3.
3
Is previous prostatectomy a risk factor for postoperative complications following minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair? A systematic review and meta-analysis.既往前列腺切除术是否是微创腹股沟疝修补术后发生术后并发症的危险因素?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):5505-5513. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11207-w. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
4
Single-port versus multi-port laparoscopic and robotic inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.单孔与多孔腹腔镜及机器人腹股沟疝修补术:系统评价与网状Meta分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jan;39(1):530-544. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11321-9. Epub 2024 Oct 17.
5
Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Prostate Cancer: Is It Really Necessary? A Multicentric Longitudinal Study Assessing Oncological Outcomes in Patients With Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection vs Radical Prostatectomy Only.前列腺癌盆腔淋巴结清扫术:真的有必要吗?一项多中心纵向研究,评估接受盆腔淋巴结清扫术与仅接受根治性前列腺切除术的前列腺癌患者的肿瘤学结局。
J Urol. 2025 Apr 28:101097JU0000000000004587. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004587.
6
Prophylactic alpha-blockade for prevention of post-operative urinary retention after inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.预防性使用 α 受体阻滞剂预防腹股沟疝修补术后尿潴留:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hernia. 2023 Dec;27(6):1351-1361. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02764-5. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
7
Laparoscopic surgery for inguinal hernia repair: systematic review of effectiveness and economic evaluation.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术:有效性的系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Apr;9(14):1-203, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta9140.
8
Mesh versus non-mesh for inguinal and femoral hernia repair.用于腹股沟疝和股疝修补的补片与非补片对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 13;9(9):CD011517. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011517.pub2.
9
The Benefits and Harms of Different Extents of Lymph Node Dissection During Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.不同程度前列腺癌根治性切除术淋巴结清扫术的获益和危害:系统综述。
Eur Urol. 2017 Jul;72(1):84-109. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.12.003. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
10
The epidemiology and risk factors for recurrence after inguinal hernia surgery.腹股沟疝修补术后复发的流行病学及危险因素
Dan Med J. 2014 May;61(5):B4846.

本文引用的文献

1
Prostate cancer incidence and mortality in Europe and implications for screening activities: population based study.欧洲的前列腺癌发病率和死亡率及其对筛查活动的影响:基于人群的研究。
BMJ. 2024 Sep 4;386:e077738. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-077738.
2
Clinical study of 3D laparoscopic radical prostatectomy by transperitoneal and extraperitoneal approaches.经腹腔和腹膜外途径3D腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的临床研究
Am J Clin Exp Urol. 2023 Dec 15;11(6):549-558. eCollection 2023.
3
Transperitoneal Versus Extraperitoneal Approach for Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.腹腔镜及机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的经腹与腹膜外入路:系统评价与Meta分析
Urol Res Pract. 2023 Sep;49(5):285-292. doi: 10.5152/tud.2023.23008.
4
Long term efficacy of prosthetic inguinal herniorrhaphy concomitant with robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.人工腹股沟疝修补术联合机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的长期疗效。
World J Urol. 2023 Nov;41(11):3169-3174. doi: 10.1007/s00345-023-04625-3. Epub 2023 Sep 27.
5
The safety and feasibility of simultaneous robotic repair of an inguinal hernia during robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术中同期行机器人腹股沟疝修补术的安全性和可行性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Scand J Urol. 2022 Jun;56(3):197-205. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2022.2065358. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
6
Open versus laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernia: an overview of systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials.腹股沟疝开放修补术与腹腔镜修补术:随机对照试验系统评价概述
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jul;36(7):4685-4700. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09161-6. Epub 2022 Mar 14.
7
Influence of previous laparo-endoscopic inguinal hernia repair on performing radical prostatectomy: a nationwide survey among urological surgeons.既往腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术对施行根治性前列腺切除术的影响:一项全国范围内泌尿外科医师的调查。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jun;35(6):2583-2591. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07676-4. Epub 2020 Jun 2.
8
Primary inguinal hernia: systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal, totally extraperitoneal, and robotic preperitoneal repair.原发性腹股沟疝:开放、腹腔镜经腹腹膜前、完全腹膜外和机器人腹膜前修补术的系统评价和贝叶斯网状 Meta 分析比较。
Hernia. 2019 Jun;23(3):473-484. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01964-2. Epub 2019 May 14.
9
Extraperitoneal vs. transperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in patients with a history of prior inguinal hernia repair with mesh.有既往腹股沟疝补片修补史患者的腹膜外与经腹膜机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术对比
J Robot Surg. 2017 Dec;11(4):447-454. doi: 10.1007/s11701-017-0678-0. Epub 2017 Jan 24.
10
Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Alone or With Laparoscopic Herniorrhaphy.单纯腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术或联合腹腔镜疝修补术
JSLS. 2015 Oct-Dec;19(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2015.00090.

既往腹股沟疝修补术对腹膜外根治性前列腺切除术的手术影响

Surgical Implications of Prior Inguinal Hernia Repair in Extraperitoneal Radical Prostatectomy.

作者信息

Golbasi Abdullah, Sahin Omer, Keske Murat, Bicer Huseyin, Elmaagac Burak, Karadag Mert Ali

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Health Sciences Medical Faculty of Kayseri, Kayseri City Hospital, Kayseri, Turkiye. (Drs. Golbasi, Karadag, Elmaagac).

Department of Urology, Kayseri City Hospital, Kayseri, Turkiye. (Drs. Sahin and Bicer).

出版信息

JSLS. 2025 Jul-Sep;29(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2025.00048. Epub 2025 Sep 3.

DOI:10.4293/JSLS.2025.00048
PMID:40917157
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12409708/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Inguinal hernia repair (IHR) is a common procedure, and patients with a history of IHR may later require radical prostatectomy. Prior IHR can complicate prostatectomy by altering anatomy, but its impact on extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (ELRP) remains unclear. This study evaluates the feasibility and outcomes of ELRP in patients with prior IHR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cross-sectional study included male patients aged 40-80 who underwent ELRP for localized prostate cancer between 2019 and 2024. Patients were stratified into two groups based on prior IHR status (group 1: without IHR; group 2: with IHR). Comparative analyses were performed on demographic data, perioperative metrics, and oncological outcomes to assess the impact of prior IHR on ELRP. Statistical significance was accepted as < .05.

RESULTS

A total of 255 patients (group 1: 220, group 2: 35) were included. No significant differences were found between the groups in terms of age and demographic characteristics. However, the operation duration was longer in group 2 (194.86 vs 176.87 minutes, = .002), and peritoneal opening occurred more frequently (34.3% vs 9.1%, < .001). There was no significant difference in the rates of pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) (25.9% vs 28.5%, = .149).

CONCLUISON

ELRP outcomes in patients with a history of IHR are similar to standard ELRP. However, when planning surgery for this group, the risk of peritoneal opening, prolonged operation time, and the careful execution of lymph node dissection should be considered.

摘要

背景

腹股沟疝修补术(IHR)是一种常见的手术,有IHR病史的患者日后可能需要进行根治性前列腺切除术。既往IHR可能会因改变解剖结构而使前列腺切除术复杂化,但其对腹膜外腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(ELRP)的影响仍不清楚。本研究评估了既往有IHR的患者行ELRP的可行性和结果。

材料与方法

这项回顾性横断面研究纳入了2019年至2024年间因局限性前列腺癌接受ELRP的40-80岁男性患者。根据既往IHR状态将患者分为两组(第1组:无IHR;第2组:有IHR)。对人口统计学数据、围手术期指标和肿瘤学结果进行比较分析,以评估既往IHR对ELRP的影响。统计学显著性以P <.05为标准。

结果

共纳入255例患者(第1组:220例,第2组:35例)。两组在年龄和人口统计学特征方面无显著差异。然而,第2组的手术时间更长(194.86分钟对176.87分钟,P =.002),腹膜开口的发生率更高(34.3%对9.1%,P <.001)。盆腔淋巴结清扫(PLND)率无显著差异(25.9%对28.5%,P =.149)。

结论

有IHR病史的患者行ELRP的结果与标准ELRP相似。然而,在为该组患者规划手术时,应考虑腹膜开口的风险、手术时间延长以及仔细进行淋巴结清扫。