Hauser Robert G, Kapphahn-Bergs Melanie, Bahbah Ali, Witt Dawn, Stanberry Larissa I, Sengupta Jay D
Joseph F. Novogratz Family Heart Rhythm Science Center, Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Heart Rhythm O2. 2025 Jun 25;6(8):1053-1059. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2025.05.033. eCollection 2025 Aug.
In 2021, Boston Scientific (BSC) announced that its Ingenio pacemakers (PMs) could exhibit high internal battery impedances (HIBIs) and trigger the safety mode (SM) that should preserve pacing when PM function is jeopardized. SM is VVI or biventricular pacing, 72.5 bpm, and unipolar, with a sensitivity of 0.25 mV. In 2023, BSC said SM may pause pacing and 3 deaths occurred in PM-dependent patients. In 2024, BSC warned that some Accolade PMs had HIBI and SM could occur.
This study aimed to quantify adverse events (AEs) associated with SM and compare them with Abbott's backup (BU), Medtronic's reset (RE), and Biotronik's backup mode.
The Food and Drug Administration's Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database was searched from 2021 to 2024 for AE involving SM, BU, RE, and backup mode.
We found 1379 AEs, including 13 deaths and 574 major AEs; 525 AEs (91.5%) were PMs in SM vs 31 (5.4%) in BU, 18 (3.1%) in RE, and none ( < .001) in backup mode. SM was associated with 349 syncopal events that resulted in head injuries (n = 25) or falls (n = 20); BU- or RE-related syncopal events resulted in 1 head injury and no falls ( < .001). Pacing inhibition was described for 204 SM-related syncopal events (58.%) but none for BU or RE. HIBI was the most common but not an exclusive cause of SM.
SM is associated with major AEs that are more numerous and serious than BU, RE, or backup mode. Most SM AEs seem related to its high sensitivity (0.25 mV), and consequently, SM may be unsafe for PM-dependent patients.
2021年,波士顿科学公司(BSC)宣布其Ingenio起搏器(PMs)可能会出现高内部电池阻抗(HIBIs)并触发安全模式(SM),该模式应在PM功能受到威胁时维持起搏。SM为VVI或双心室起搏,72.5次/分钟,单极,灵敏度为0.25 mV。2023年,BSC表示SM可能会暂停起搏,并且在依赖起搏器的患者中发生了3例死亡。2024年,BSC警告称,一些Accolade PMs存在HIBI且可能发生SM。
本研究旨在量化与SM相关的不良事件(AEs),并将其与雅培的备用(BU)模式、美敦力的重置(RE)模式和百多力的备用模式进行比较。
检索美国食品药品监督管理局的制造商和用户设施设备经验数据库,以获取2021年至2024年期间涉及SM、BU、RE和备用模式的AE。
我们发现了1379例AE,包括13例死亡和574例严重AE;525例AE(91.5%)发生在处于SM模式的PMs中,而处于BU模式的为31例(5.4%),处于RE模式的为18例(3.1%),处于备用模式的无一例(<0.001)。SM与349例晕厥事件相关,这些事件导致头部受伤(n = 25)或跌倒(n = 20);与BU或RE相关的晕厥事件导致1例头部受伤且无跌倒事件(<0.001)。204例与SM相关的晕厥事件(58.%)描述有起搏抑制,但BU或RE相关事件中无此情况。HIBI是SM最常见但并非唯一的原因。
SM与比BU、RE或备用模式更多且更严重的严重AE相关。大多数SM AE似乎与其高灵敏度(0.25 mV)有关,因此,SM对依赖起搏器的患者可能不安全。