Canestaro William J, Patterson Julie A, Campbell Jonathan D
The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, University of Washington School of Pharmacy, Seattle, WA 98125, United States.
Department of Management and Organization, University of Washington School of Business, Seattle, WA 98125, United States.
Health Aff Sch. 2025 Aug 7;3(9):qxaf156. doi: 10.1093/haschl/qxaf156. eCollection 2025 Sep.
There is limited direct measurement of whether the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) is beginning to influence investment strategy and decisions.
Using a standardized guide, we interviewed life science investors from a range of stages, investment sizes, and fund types to explore how incentives under the IRA have impacted investment decisions.
We interviewed 31 active investors. Over 90% had discussed the law within their firm. While 71% reported a lack of firm-wide consensus as to the IRA's precise potential impacts, 87% reported that the IRA was making it more challenging to bring innovative new medicines to market. All but one investor reported they were more likely to consider a larger launch indication for products they invest in, and 77% reported the IRA influenced small molecule investing.
Early signals of IRA impact on investor strategy include favoring a larger population launch and reduced small molecule investing. Noting stated preference and other study limitations, investors signaled continued interest in certain high Medicare utilization drugs. Buy-side investment impacts remain understudied.
关于《降低通胀法案》(IRA)是否开始影响投资策略和决策的直接衡量有限。
我们使用标准化指南,采访了处于不同阶段、投资规模和基金类型的生命科学投资者,以探讨IRA下的激励措施如何影响投资决策。
我们采访了31位活跃投资者。超过90%的人在其公司内部讨论过该法案。虽然71%的人报告称就IRA的确切潜在影响缺乏全公司范围的共识,但87%的人报告称IRA使创新新药进入市场变得更具挑战性。除一位投资者外,所有投资者均表示他们更有可能考虑为其投资的产品选择更大范围的上市适应症人群,77%的人报告称IRA影响了小分子投资。
IRA对投资者策略影响的早期信号包括倾向于更大范围的人群上市和减少小分子投资。考虑到既定偏好及其他研究局限性,投资者仍表示对某些医疗保险利用率高的药物持续感兴趣。买方投资影响仍未得到充分研究。