• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脊髓刺激治疗疼痛性糖尿病周围神经病变临床效果的回顾性分析

Retrospective analysis of the clinical effect of spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

作者信息

Cui Dongqiang, Yang Ming, Qiao Yang, Gong Zhenxing, Hu Zeqing, Ma Zhuang, Wu Yang, Huo Guitong

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Xingtai Ninth Hospital, Xingtai, China.

Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2025 Aug 21;16:1619851. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1619851. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.3389/fneur.2025.1619851
PMID:40917678
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12408299/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety-two patients underwent permanent SCS implantation and completed a 6-month post-operative follow-up. The primary endpoint was patient amputation rate, and secondary endpoints included Quality of Life (QOL LC V2.0) scale, pain visual analogue scale (VAS), limb nerve conduction velocity, latency and amplitude, and vibration perception threshold (VPT).

RESULTS

In patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy, QOL LC V2.0 and VAS scores were significantly improved at 6 months postoperatively compared to preoperatively (24.74%,  < 0.05; 71.87%,  < 0.05). Compared with the median and ulnar nerves of the upper extremity peripheral nerves, the conduction velocities of the common peroneal, sural, superficial peroneal and tibial nerves of the lower extremity peripheral nerves were increased ( < 0.05), the latency was significantly shortened ( < 0.05) and the amplitude was significantly increased ( < 0.05) at 6 months after surgery. Compared to the dorsum of the hand, VPTs were significantly lower in the first toe and dorsum of the foot at 6 months postoperatively compared to preoperatively ( < 0.05). The overall amputation rate was 8.69%, with 3.26% for major amputation (above the ankle) and 5.43% for minor amputation (below the ankle).

CONCLUSION

SCS can effectively relieve lower limb pain in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy, repair lower limb peripheral nerves, improve patients' quality of life, and reduce amputation rate.

摘要

引言

本研究旨在评估脊髓刺激(SCS)治疗疼痛性糖尿病周围神经病变(PDPN)患者的临床疗效。

材料与方法

92例患者接受了永久性SCS植入,并完成了术后6个月的随访。主要终点是患者截肢率,次要终点包括生活质量(QOL LC V2.0)量表、疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)、肢体神经传导速度、潜伏期和波幅,以及振动觉阈值(VPT)。

结果

糖尿病周围神经病变患者术后6个月时,QOL LC V2.0和VAS评分较术前显著改善(分别为24.74%,P<0.05;71.87%,P<0.05)。与上肢周围神经的正中神经和尺神经相比,下肢周围神经的腓总神经、腓肠神经、腓浅神经和胫神经的传导速度在术后6个月时增加(P<0.05),潜伏期显著缩短(P<0.05),波幅显著增加(P<0.05)。与手背相比,术后6个月时第一趾和足背的VPT较术前显著降低(P<0.05)。总体截肢率为8.69%,其中大截肢(踝关节以上)率为3.26%,小截肢(踝关节以下)率为5.43%。

结论

SCS可有效缓解糖尿病周围神经病变患者的下肢疼痛,修复下肢周围神经,改善患者生活质量,并降低截肢率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eae2/12408299/2fbb81f6cf37/fneur-16-1619851-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eae2/12408299/f9fb133a1f50/fneur-16-1619851-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eae2/12408299/338a291d283d/fneur-16-1619851-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eae2/12408299/01b94d8b21c5/fneur-16-1619851-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eae2/12408299/2fbb81f6cf37/fneur-16-1619851-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eae2/12408299/f9fb133a1f50/fneur-16-1619851-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eae2/12408299/338a291d283d/fneur-16-1619851-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eae2/12408299/01b94d8b21c5/fneur-16-1619851-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eae2/12408299/2fbb81f6cf37/fneur-16-1619851-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Retrospective analysis of the clinical effect of spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy.脊髓刺激治疗疼痛性糖尿病周围神经病变临床效果的回顾性分析
Front Neurol. 2025 Aug 21;16:1619851. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1619851. eCollection 2025.
2
Comparative Analysis of the Efficacy of Spinal Cord Stimulation and Traditional Debridement Care in the Treatment of Ischemic Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Retrospective Cohort Study.脊髓电刺激与传统清创护理治疗缺血性糖尿病足溃疡的疗效比较分析:回顾性队列研究。
Neurosurgery. 2024 Aug 1;95(2):313-321. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002866. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
3
Quantitative assessment of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy after high-frequency spinal cord stimulation: a pilot study.高频脊髓刺激治疗后痛性糖尿病周围神经病的定量评估:一项初步研究。
Pain Med. 2023 Oct 13;24(Supplement_2):S41-S47. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnad087.
4
Comparison of clinical outcomes associated with spinal cord stimulation (SCS) or conventional medical management (CMM) for chronic pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.比较脊髓刺激 (SCS) 与常规药物治疗 (CMM) 治疗慢性疼痛的临床结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Jun;32(6):2029-2041. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07716-2. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
5
Adverse effects of linezolid in the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis combined with diabetic peripheral neuropathy.利奈唑胺治疗耐多药结核病合并糖尿病周围神经病变的不良反应。
Eur J Med Res. 2025 Aug 12;30(1):737. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-03011-6.
6
Decompressive surgery of lower limbs for symmetrical diabetic peripheral neuropathy.下肢减压手术治疗对称性糖尿病周围神经病变
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16;2008(3):CD006152. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006152.pub2.
7
High-frequency spinal cord stimulation (10 kHz) alters sensory function and nerve fiber density in painful diabetic neuropathy: a pilot prospective open-label study.高频脊髓刺激(10 kHz)改变痛性糖尿病周围神经病的感觉功能和神经纤维密度:一项前瞻性开放标记研究的初步结果。
Pain Med. 2023 Oct 13;24(Supplement_2):S33-S40. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnad096.
8
Non-surgical interventions for preventing contralateral tissue loss and amputation in dysvascular patients with a primary major lower limb amputation.非手术干预措施预防原发性下肢主要截肢后血运不良患者对侧组织损失和截肢
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 28;8(8):CD013857. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013857.pub2.
9
How To Improve Patient Selection in Individuals With Lower Extremity Amputation Using a Bone-anchored Prosthesis.如何使用骨锚式假肢改善下肢截肢患者的患者选择
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 24. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003369.
10
Electrophysiological findings for peripheral nerves of lower limb in women with stress urinary incontinence and non-specific low back pain.压力性尿失禁和非特异性下腰痛女性下肢周围神经的电生理检查结果
Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 20;15(1):20194. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06202-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison Between the Efficacy of Spinal Cord Stimulation and of Endovascular Revascularization in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Retrospective Observational Study.脊髓刺激与血管内再通治疗糖尿病足溃疡的疗效比较:一项回顾性观察研究。
Neuromodulation. 2023 Oct;26(7):1424-1432. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2023.07.007. Epub 2023 Aug 23.
2
Response to the Letter to the Editor Regarding: "Clinical Effect Analysis of Spinal Cord Electrical Stimulator Implantation for Diabetic Foot".对致编辑的信的回复,主题为:“脊髓电刺激植入治疗糖尿病足的临床疗效分析”
Neuromodulation. 2023 Apr;26(3):712. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2023.01.008.
3
Towards prevention of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: clinical presentation, pathogenesis, and new treatments.
迈向糖尿病周围神经病变的预防:临床特征、发病机制和新的治疗方法。
Lancet Neurol. 2022 Oct;21(10):922-936. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00188-0.
4
A Review of Techniques for Surface Electromyography Signal Quality Analysis.表面肌电信号质量分析技术综述
IEEE Rev Biomed Eng. 2023;16:472-486. doi: 10.1109/RBME.2022.3164797. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
5
Durability of High-Frequency 10-kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation for Patients With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy Refractory to Conventional Treatments: 12-Month Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial.高频10kHz脊髓刺激对常规治疗无效的疼痛性糖尿病神经病变患者的疗效持久性:一项随机对照试验的12个月结果
Diabetes Care. 2022 Jan 1;45(1):e3-e6. doi: 10.2337/dc21-1813.
6
Peripheral Nerve Conduction And Sympathetic Skin Response Are Reliable Methods to Detect Diabetic Cardiac Autonomic Neuropathy.周围神经传导和交感皮肤反应是检测糖尿病心脏自主神经病变的可靠方法。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2021 Sep 21;12:709114. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.709114. eCollection 2021.
7
Clinical Effect Analysis of Spinal Cord Electrical Stimulator Implantation for Diabetic Foot.脊髓电刺激器植入治疗糖尿病足的临床疗效分析
Neuromodulation. 2023 Jan;26(1):246-251. doi: 10.1111/ner.13502. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
8
Effect of High-frequency (10-kHz) Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.高频(10kHz)脊髓刺激治疗糖尿病性神经痛的疗效:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Neurol. 2021 Jun 1;78(6):687-698. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.0538.
9
Improving Limb Salvage for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia With Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Retrospective Analysis.脊髓刺激改善慢性肢体威胁性缺血的肢体保全:回顾性分析。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2021 May;55(4):367-373. doi: 10.1177/1538574420985765. Epub 2021 Feb 8.
10
High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation at 10 kHz for the Treatment of Combined Neck and Arm Pain: Results From a Prospective Multicenter Study.高频脊髓刺激(10 kHz)治疗颈臂痛:一项前瞻性多中心研究结果。
Neurosurgery. 2020 Aug 1;87(2):176-185. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyz495.