• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

择期手部手术后90天内的急诊科就诊情况:一项医疗保健利用情况研究。

Emergency Department Visits Within 90 Days of Elective Hand Surgery: A Healthcare Utilization Study.

作者信息

Ross Katie, Glazebrook Haley, Douglas Jo-Anne, MacLellan Justin, Krauss Emily M

机构信息

Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.

Faculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.

出版信息

Plast Surg (Oakv). 2025 Sep 3:22925503251371057. doi: 10.1177/22925503251371057.

DOI:10.1177/22925503251371057
PMID:40917899
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12408531/
Abstract

Emergency department (ED) visits following elective surgeries place significant strain on already overburdened healthcare systems. In Nova Scotia, carpal tunnel release (CTR) and trigger finger release (TFR) are the most common elective hand surgeries performed. This study sought to determine the rates, reasons, and risk factors associated with ED visits following elective outpatient hand surgery. Patients who underwent CTR or TFR between April 1, 2016 and March 31, 2022, and visited any Nova Scotia ED within 90 days of surgery were identified using provincial healthcare databases. A chart review was completed to explore ED timing, reasons for presentation, and predetermined systems-level factors. During the retrospective period, 2690 patients underwent CTR and 1103 patients underwent TFR. For CTR, 159 patients (5.97%) presented to the ED within 90 days of surgery for surgery-specific concerns. The most common presentation was surgical site infection (2.16%), wound check (1.60%), and suture removal (1.04%). For TFR, 63 (5.71%) patients presented to the ED within 90 days. Similarly, surgical site infection was the most common presentation (2.63%) followed by suture removal (1.45%) and wound check (1.18%). The most frequent timing for ED presentation was days 13-15 (27.9%). In an evaluation of true healthcare utilization after elective surgery, ED visits for surgery-specific concerns after CTR and TFR were nearly 6%, far exceeding expected complication rates. As the presentations are manageable in an outpatient clinic or office setting, a mixed-methods patient-oriented intervention is planned to redirect this population away from the ED.

摘要

择期手术后的急诊科(ED)就诊给本就不堪重负的医疗系统带来了巨大压力。在新斯科舍省,腕管松解术(CTR)和扳机指松解术(TFR)是最常见的择期手部手术。本研究旨在确定择期门诊手部手术后急诊科就诊的发生率、原因及风险因素。利用省级医疗数据库识别出在2016年4月1日至2022年3月31日期间接受CTR或TFR手术且在术后90天内前往新斯科舍省任何一家急诊科就诊的患者。完成了一项病历审查,以探究急诊科就诊时间、就诊原因以及预先确定的系统层面因素。在回顾期内,2690例患者接受了CTR手术,1103例患者接受了TFR手术。对于CTR手术,159例患者(5.97%)在术后90天内因手术相关问题前往急诊科就诊。最常见的就诊原因是手术部位感染(2.16%)、伤口检查(1.60%)和缝线拆除(1.04%)。对于TFR手术,63例患者(5.71%)在术后90天内前往急诊科就诊。同样,手术部位感染是最常见的就诊原因(2.63%),其次是缝线拆除(1.45%)和伤口检查(1.18%)。急诊科就诊最频繁的时间是术后第13 - 15天(27.9%)。在对择期手术后实际医疗利用情况的评估中,CTR和TFR手术后因手术相关问题前往急诊科就诊的比例近6%,远远超过预期的并发症发生率。由于这些情况在门诊诊所或办公室环境中是可以处理的,因此计划采用一种以患者为导向的混合方法干预措施,将这部分人群从急诊科分流。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f8c/12408531/452083cb6e23/10.1177_22925503251371057-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f8c/12408531/b0e5312e4b4e/10.1177_22925503251371057-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f8c/12408531/f15f35c45485/10.1177_22925503251371057-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f8c/12408531/452083cb6e23/10.1177_22925503251371057-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f8c/12408531/b0e5312e4b4e/10.1177_22925503251371057-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f8c/12408531/f15f35c45485/10.1177_22925503251371057-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f8c/12408531/452083cb6e23/10.1177_22925503251371057-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Emergency Department Visits Within 90 Days of Elective Hand Surgery: A Healthcare Utilization Study.择期手部手术后90天内的急诊科就诊情况:一项医疗保健利用情况研究。
Plast Surg (Oakv). 2025 Sep 3:22925503251371057. doi: 10.1177/22925503251371057.
2
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
3
Are Quality Scores in the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services Merit-based Incentive Payment System Associated With Outcomes After Outpatient Orthopaedic Surgery?医疗补助与医疗照顾服务中心基于绩效的激励支付系统中的质量评分与门诊骨科手术后的结果相关吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Jul 1;482(7):1107-1116. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003033. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
4
Emergency Department Visits Within Ninety Days of Endoscopic Lumbar Decompression.内镜下腰椎减压术后90天内的急诊就诊情况
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2025 Aug 19;9(8). doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-25-00009. eCollection 2025 Aug 1.
5
Endoscopic release for carpal tunnel syndrome.腕管综合征的内镜下松解术
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 31;2014(1):CD008265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008265.pub2.
6
Pharmacological interventions for the prevention of bleeding in people undergoing elective hip or knee surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.择期髋关节或膝关节手术患者预防出血的药物干预措施:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 16;1(1):CD013295. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013295.pub2.
7
Intramuscular versus oral corticosteroids to reduce relapses following discharge from the emergency department for acute asthma.肌肉注射与口服皮质类固醇用于减少急性哮喘患者从急诊科出院后的复发情况。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 2;6(6):CD012629. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012629.pub2.
8
Absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for skin closure after carpal tunnel decompression surgery.腕管减压术后皮肤缝合用可吸收缝线与不可吸收缝线的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 1;2(2):CD011757. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011757.pub2.
9
A Small Number of Surgeons Perform the Large Majority of Uncommon Nerve Decompression Procedures.少数外科医生完成了绝大多数不常见的神经减压手术。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2182-2190. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003162. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
10
Age, ASA physical status and surgical outcomes: insights from a nationwide cohort study.年龄、美国麻醉医师协会身体状况与手术结局:一项全国性队列研究的见解
Anaesthesia. 2025 Jul 29. doi: 10.1111/anae.16723.

本文引用的文献

1
What Is a Surgical Site Infection After Carpal Tunnel Release?腕管松解术后的手术部位感染是什么?
J Hand Surg Am. 2024 Aug;49(8):766-771. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2023.12.014. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
2
Risk Factors for Preventable Emergency Department Use After Outpatient Hand Surgery.门诊手部手术后可预防的急诊科就诊风险因素。
J Hand Surg Am. 2022 Sep;47(9):855-864. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2022.05.012. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
3
Risk Factors and Reasons for Emergency Department Visits Within 30 Days of Elective Hand Surgery: An Analysis of 3,261 Patients.
择期手部手术后 30 天内急诊就诊的风险因素和原因:3261 例患者分析。
J Hand Surg Asian Pac Vol. 2022 Feb;27(1):76-82. doi: 10.1142/S2424835522500047. Epub 2022 Jan 14.
4
Unplanned Emergency and Urgent Care Visits After Outpatient Orthopaedic Surgery.门诊骨科手术后的非计划性急诊和紧急护理就诊。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2021 Sep 20;5(9):e21.00209. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00209.
5
A Prospective Evaluation of Postoperative Readmissions After Outpatient Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery.门诊手部及上肢手术后再入院情况的前瞻性评估
Cureus. 2021 May 26;13(5):e15247. doi: 10.7759/cureus.15247.
6
Emergency Department Utilization After Outpatient Hand Surgery.门诊手外科后的急诊科利用情况。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020 Aug 1;28(15):639-649. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00527.
7
Thirty-day Emergency Department Utilization after Distal Radius Fracture Treatment: Identifying Predictors and Variation.桡骨远端骨折治疗后的30天急诊科利用率:确定预测因素和差异
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Sep 10;7(9):e2416. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002416. eCollection 2019 Sep.
8
Unplanned Emergency Department Visits within 30 Days of Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction.乳房切除术和乳房重建术后 30 天内的非计划性急诊就诊。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Dec;142(6):1411-1420. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004970.
9
Carpal tunnel release: Lifetime prevalence, annual incidence, and risk factors.腕管松解术:终身患病率、年发病率和危险因素。
Muscle Nerve. 2018 Oct;58(4):497-502. doi: 10.1002/mus.26145. Epub 2018 May 18.
10
Unplanned Readmissions Following Outpatient Hand and Elbow Surgery.门诊手部和肘部手术后的非计划再入院情况。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Apr 5;99(7):541-549. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01423.