Gupta Kamlesh K, Singh Shantanu, Atam Virendra, Mishra Devansh, Tewari Jay, Chaudhary Shyam C, Patwa Ajay
Internal Medicine, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, IND.
Medicine, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, IND.
Cureus. 2025 Aug 6;17(8):e89469. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89469. eCollection 2025 Aug.
Introduction Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is increasingly recognized not only as a pulmonary condition but as a systemic disorder with significant cardiovascular implications. Acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) further elevate this risk, potentially through a heightened prothrombotic state. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the levels of select prothrombotic biomarkers - fibrinogen, C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, von Willebrand Factor (vWF), homocysteine, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) - in patients with stable COPD and AECOPD, and to assess their diagnostic and prognostic significance. Materials and methods This case-control study was conducted over a year at King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India and compared prothrombotic biomarkers in patients with AECOPD and stable COPD. Eligible participants were aged between 30 and 80 years old and diagnosed with COPD, as per the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria. CRP, fibrinogen, D-dimer, and vWF were analyzed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). Statistical analysis involved t-tests, Chi-square, and correlation methods. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant. Ethical approval and informed consent were obtained from all participants. Results Among the 30 stable COPD and 30 AECOPD patients involved in this study, significant elevations in serum fibrinogen, D-dimer, and vWF levels were observed in the exacerbation group. Mean fibrinogen levels were markedly higher in the AECOPD patients (mean±SD: 577.23±112.12 mg/dL) compared to stable COPD (391.2±87.15 mg/dL; p<0.0001), and similar trends were seen for D-dimer (0.93±0.28 vs. 0.46±0.19 µg/mL) and vWF (159.2±36.42 vs. 116.6±30.23 IU/dL). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) using the area under curve (AUC) analysis identified fibrinogen as the most robust discriminator for AECOPD (AUC=0.89), D-dimer (AUC=0.82), and vWF (AUC=0.74). Other biomarkers like homocysteine, LDH, and PLR also exhibited significant elevations during exacerbations, correlating moderately with spirometric severity and symptom burden. Conclusions The findings suggest that AECOPD is associated with a pronounced prothrombotic milieu. Biomarkers such as fibrinogen, vWF, and D-dimer hold strong potential as indicators for early detection and risk stratification of acute exacerbations. Integrating these markers into routine COPD monitoring protocols may enhance clinical decision making, particularly in predicting exacerbation risk and guiding anti-inflammatory or anticoagulant therapies. Further longitudinal studies are warranted to validate their role in forecasting adverse events and long-term outcomes.
引言
慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)越来越被认为不仅是一种肺部疾病,而且是一种具有重大心血管影响的全身性疾病。COPD急性加重(AECOPD)会进一步增加这种风险,可能是通过提高血栓前状态来实现的。本研究旨在评估和比较稳定期COPD患者和AECOPD患者中选定的血栓前生物标志物——纤维蛋白原、C反应蛋白(CRP)、D-二聚体、血管性血友病因子(vWF)、同型半胱氨酸、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)和血小板与淋巴细胞比值(PLR)的水平,并评估它们的诊断和预后意义。
材料和方法
本病例对照研究在印度勒克瑙的乔治国王医学院进行了一年,比较了AECOPD患者和稳定期COPD患者的血栓前生物标志物。符合条件的参与者年龄在30至80岁之间,根据慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议(GOLD)标准被诊断为COPD。使用酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)分析CRP、纤维蛋白原、D-二聚体和vWF。统计分析采用t检验、卡方检验和相关方法。p值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。所有参与者均获得伦理批准并签署知情同意书。
结果
在本研究纳入的30例稳定期COPD患者和30例AECOPD患者中,急性加重组的血清纤维蛋白原、D-二聚体和vWF水平显著升高。与稳定期COPD患者(391.2±87.15mg/dL)相比,AECOPD患者的平均纤维蛋白原水平明显更高(平均值±标准差:577.23±112.12mg/dL;p<0.0001),D-二聚体(0.93±0.28对0.46±0.19μg/mL)和vWF(159.2±36.42对116.6±30.23IU/dL)也呈现类似趋势。使用曲线下面积(AUC)分析的受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线确定纤维蛋白原为AECOPD最可靠的鉴别指标(AUC=0.89),其次是D-二聚体(AUC=0.82)和vWF(AUC=0.74)。同型半胱氨酸、LDH和PLR等其他生物标志物在急性加重期间也显著升高,与肺功能严重程度和症状负担呈中度相关。
结论
研究结果表明,AECOPD与明显的血栓前环境相关。纤维蛋白原、vWF和D-二聚体等生物标志物具有作为急性加重早期检测和风险分层指标的强大潜力。将这些标志物纳入常规COPD监测方案可能会改善临床决策,特别是在预测加重风险和指导抗炎或抗凝治疗方面。需要进一步的纵向研究来验证它们在预测不良事件和长期预后中的作用。