Suppr超能文献

脂质体布比卡因在膝关节置换术后收肌管阻滞中的镇痛效果:一项单中心、前瞻性、随机对照临床试验

The Analgesic Efficacy of Liposomal Bupivacaine in Adductor Canal Block Following Knee Arthroplasty: A Single-Center, Prospective, Randomized and Controlled Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Xu Min, Wang Sheng, Meng Yan, Gao Chen, Liu Lin, Yuan Ji, Ding Sheng, Chai Xiaoqing, He Keqiang

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, People's Republic of China.

Graduate School,Bengbu Medical University, Bengbu, Anhui, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Drug Des Devel Ther. 2025 Sep 2;19:7591-7601. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S535901. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of liposomal bupivacaine with that of traditional ropivacaine in adductor canal blocks for patients undergoing knee arthroplasty.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 119 consenting participants, who were scheduled for elective knee arthroplasty (including total knee replacement and unicompartmental knee replacement) under general anesthesia, were randomly assigned to either receive an ultrasound-guided adductor canal block with ropivacaine or liposomal bupivacaine. The primary endpoint of this study was the pain scores at 2, 24, 48, and 72 hours post-surgery. Secondary outcomes included nausea, vomiting, and pruritis, the ability to engage in physiotherapy on the first day after surgery, postoperative exercise, patient satisfaction with anesthesia, postoperative recovery index, and patient-controlled analgesic presses (12-48 hours) for both groups.

RESULTS

The Visual Analog Scale (VAS), assessed from 24 to 72 hours post-follow-up, demonstrated that patients receiving ropivacaine had higher median VAS scores compared to those in the liposomal bupivacaine group, both at rest and during exercise. The weighted AUC numerical rating scale pain scores whether at rest or move in the liposomal bupivacaine group was lower than the standard bupivacaine group with statistical significance. Whether it is 0-24 hours (Rest 58.00 [53.75, 69.00] vs 48.00 [46.50, 58.00]; Move:57.00 [46.00, 59.00] vs 36.00 [35.00, 48.00]) or 0-72 hours (Rest 214.00 [197.75, 237.00] vs 165.00 [143.50, 180.00]; Move:202.00 [190.00, 215.75]vs.156.00 [131.00, 178.00]) From 12 to 48 hours, the ropivacaine group had a significantly higher number of PCIA presses. The liposomal bupivacaine group also achieved greater pain-free bending angles and walking distances compared to the ropivacaine group.

CONCLUSION

Liposomal bupivacaine used in adductor canal block provides extended pain relief in knee arthroplasty patients, aiding early rehabilitation.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较脂质体布比卡因与传统罗哌卡因在膝关节置换术患者内收肌管阻滞中的镇痛效果。

患者与方法

共有119名同意参与的受试者,计划在全身麻醉下接受择期膝关节置换术(包括全膝关节置换和单髁膝关节置换),被随机分配接受超声引导下罗哌卡因或脂质体布比卡因内收肌管阻滞。本研究的主要终点是术后2、24、48和72小时的疼痛评分。次要结局包括恶心、呕吐和瘙痒、术后第一天进行物理治疗的能力、术后锻炼、患者对麻醉的满意度、术后恢复指数以及两组患者的患者自控镇痛按压次数(12 - 48小时)。

结果

随访后24至72小时评估的视觉模拟量表(VAS)显示,接受罗哌卡因的患者在休息和运动时的VAS中位数评分均高于脂质体布比卡因组。脂质体布比卡因组在休息或运动时的加权AUC数字评定量表疼痛评分低于标准布比卡因组,具有统计学意义。无论是0 - 24小时(休息:58.00 [53.75, 69.00] 对 48.00 [46.50, 58.00];运动:57.00 [46.00, 59.00] 对 36.00 [35.00, 48.00])还是0 - 72小时(休息:214.00 [197.75, 237.00] 对 165.00 [143.50, 180.00];运动:202.00 [190.00, 215.75] 对 156.00 [131.00, 178.00]),12至48小时期间,罗哌卡因组的PCIA按压次数显著更高。脂质体布比卡因组与罗哌卡因组相比,还实现了更大的无痛弯曲角度和行走距离。

结论

内收肌管阻滞中使用的脂质体布比卡因可为膝关节置换术患者提供更长时间的疼痛缓解,有助于早期康复。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1ae6/12413848/9e526cb3a20c/DDDT-19-7591-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验