• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用铸造、选择性激光烧结、软铣削和硬铣削技术制造的种植体支持的钴铬棒的适合性分析。

Fit analysis of implant-supported Co-Cr bars fabricated using casting, selective laser sintering, soft and dense milling techniques.

作者信息

Yiğit Elif, Şahin Volkan

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Kırıkkale University, Kırıkkale, Türkiye.

出版信息

J Adv Prosthodont. 2025 Aug;17(4):210-223. doi: 10.4047/jap.2025.17.4.210. Epub 2025 Aug 19.

DOI:10.4047/jap.2025.17.4.210
PMID:40919048
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12411299/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the fit of implant-supported bars fabricated using different computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A mandibular model with four dental implants (Nobel Replace Conical Connection, 3.5 mm × 11.5 mm) was fabricated using photoelastic resin. Sixteen Co-Cr implant-supported bars were produced using four CAM techniques: casting milled wax (CMW), selective laser sintering (SLS), dense milling (DM), and soft milling (SM) (n = 4). Fit was assessed through photoelastic stress analysis and digital scanning with a topographic digitizer (BreuckmannSmartScan). A standardized coordinate system was used for fit analysis. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, with Dunn-Bonferroni for multiple comparisons (α = .05).

RESULTS

Photoelastic analysis showed that bars fabricated with DM exhibited the lowest stress levels, while SM showed moderate stress. Fit was significantly influenced by Δy-z, Δd, and Δd ( < .01), whereas Δhex and Δx-z had no significant effect ( > .05). The highest mean Δy-z value was observed in CMW (0.68 ± 0.28°) and the lowest in SLS (0.01 ± 0.34°). CMW had the highest Δd (-160.44 ± 61.17 µm) and DM the lowest (-5.46 ± 11.80 µm). DM showed the highest Δd (46.23 ± 39.32 µm), while SM had the lowest (-55.04 ± 35.06 µm), with significant differences among the techniques.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, full-arch implant supported Co-Cr bars fabricated using the different CAM techniques exhibited clinically acceptable passive fit.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了使用不同计算机辅助制造(CAM)技术制作的种植体支持杆的适合性。

材料与方法

使用光弹性树脂制作一个带有四颗牙种植体(诺贝尔Replace锥形连接,3.5毫米×11.5毫米)的下颌模型。使用四种CAM技术制作了16根钴铬合金种植体支持杆:铸模铣削蜡型(CMW)、选择性激光烧结(SLS)、密集铣削(DM)和软铣削(SM)(n = 4)。通过光弹性应力分析和使用地形数字化仪(Breuckmann SmartScan)进行数字扫描来评估适合性。使用标准化坐标系进行适合性分析。数据采用Kruskal-Wallis检验进行分析,多重比较采用Dunn-Bonferroni检验(α = 0.05)。

结果

光弹性分析表明,DM制作的杆应力水平最低,而SM显示出中等应力。适合性受到Δy-z、Δd和Δd(<0.01)的显著影响,而Δhex和Δx-z没有显著影响(>0.05)。CMW中观察到的平均Δy-z值最高(0.68±0.28°),SLS中最低(0.01±0.34°)。CMW的Δd最高(-160.44±61.17微米),DM最低(-5.46±11.80微米)。DM的Δd最高(46.23±39.32微米),而SM最低(-55.04±35.06微米),不同技术之间存在显著差异。

结论

总之,使用不同CAM技术制作的全牙弓种植体支持的钴铬合金杆表现出临床上可接受的被动适合性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a01/12411299/16f5c838fb9f/jap-17-210-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a01/12411299/cd5b4916611b/jap-17-210-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a01/12411299/57a5d5d00b76/jap-17-210-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a01/12411299/4d9b08c7df40/jap-17-210-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a01/12411299/ee973090a280/jap-17-210-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a01/12411299/16f5c838fb9f/jap-17-210-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a01/12411299/cd5b4916611b/jap-17-210-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a01/12411299/57a5d5d00b76/jap-17-210-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a01/12411299/4d9b08c7df40/jap-17-210-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a01/12411299/ee973090a280/jap-17-210-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a01/12411299/16f5c838fb9f/jap-17-210-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Fit analysis of implant-supported Co-Cr bars fabricated using casting, selective laser sintering, soft and dense milling techniques.使用铸造、选择性激光烧结、软铣削和硬铣削技术制造的种植体支持的钴铬棒的适合性分析。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2025 Aug;17(4):210-223. doi: 10.4047/jap.2025.17.4.210. Epub 2025 Aug 19.
2
Additive manufacturing of CAD-CAM complete arch fixed implant restorations supported by six implants: Prosthetic screw stability and marginal precision under masticatory simulation.由六颗种植体支持的CAD-CAM全牙弓固定种植修复体的增材制造:咀嚼模拟下的修复体螺钉稳定性和边缘精度
J Prosthet Dent. 2025 Sep;134(3):783.e1-783.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.04.042. Epub 2025 May 21.
3
Effects of complete-arch digital scanning techniques on the passive fit of CAD-CAM verification devices.全牙弓数字扫描技术对CAD-CAM验证装置被动适合性的影响。
J Prosthodont. 2025 Aug;34(7):741-748. doi: 10.1111/jopr.14084. Epub 2025 Jun 19.
4
Comparison of Dimensional Accuracy and Stability of 3D-Printed, Computer-Aided Design/Computer-Aided Manufacturing (CAD/CAM), and Conventional Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA) Denture Base Materials: An In Vitro Study.3D打印、计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)和传统聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)义齿基托材料的尺寸精度和稳定性比较:一项体外研究。
Cureus. 2025 May 31;17(5):e85128. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85128. eCollection 2025 May.
5
Image-guided photogrammetry accuracy: In vitro evaluation of an implant-supported complete arch digital scanning technology.影像引导摄影测量精度:种植体支持的全牙弓数字扫描技术的体外评估
J Prosthet Dent. 2025 Sep;134(3):818-828. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.03.047. Epub 2025 Apr 28.
6
ACCURACY OF REMOVABLE PARTIAL DENTURE METAL FRAMEWORKS FABRICATED BY COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN/ COMPUTER-AIDED MANUFACTURING METHOD: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.计算机辅助设计/计算机辅助制造方法制作的可摘局部义齿金属支架的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2022 Sep;22(3):101681. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2021.101681. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
7
Selective laser sintering versus conventional lost-wax casting for single metal copings: A systematic review and meta-analysis.选择性激光烧结与传统失蜡铸造在单金属冠修复中的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Nov;128(5):897-904. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.02.011. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
8
Effect of finish line designs on the dimensional accuracy of monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated with a material jetting technique.终饰线设计对采用材料喷射技术制作的整体式氧化锆全冠尺寸精度的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2025 Jul;134(1):176.e1-176.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.02.055. Epub 2025 Mar 17.
9
Accuracy of CAD-CAM milling versus conventional lost-wax casting for single metal copings: A systematic review and meta-analysis.CAD-CAM 铣削与传统失蜡铸造在单金属冠修复体中的精度比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Jul;132(1):51-58. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.05.018. Epub 2022 Jul 2.
10
Three-dimensional evaluation of the internal and marginal fit of multiunit implant-supported anterior fixed dental prostheses fabricated using different intraoral scanning protocols: An in vitro study.使用不同口内扫描方案制作的多单位种植体支持的前牙固定义齿内部和边缘适合性的三维评估:一项体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2025 Sep;134(3):764.e1-764.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2025.06.001. Epub 2025 Jul 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Accuracy of fit for cobaltchromium bar over two implants fabricated with different manufacturing techniques: an in-vitro study.钴铬棒在两种不同制造技术下的两种种植体中的拟合精度:一项体外研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Nov 29;23(1):946. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03700-w.
2
Additively and subtractively manufactured implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: A systematic review.增材制造和减材制造的种植体支持固定义齿修复体:系统评价。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023 Sep;34 Suppl 26:50-63. doi: 10.1111/clr.14085.
3
Magnitude of misfit threshold in implant-supported restorations: A systematic review.
种植体支持修复体中不匹配阈值的大小:一项系统评价。
J Prosthet Dent. 2024 Sep;132(3):528-535. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.09.010. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
4
Fully Digital versus Conventional Workflows for Fabricating Posterior Three-Unit Implant-Supported Reconstructions: A Prospective Crossover Clinical Trial.全数字化与传统流程在制作后牙三单位种植体支持修复体中的应用:一项前瞻性交叉临床试验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 12;19(18):11456. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811456.
5
Marginal Fit of Temporary Restorations Fabricated by the Conventional Chairside Method, 3D Printing, and Milling.传统椅旁制作法、3D打印及铣削制作的临时修复体的边缘适合性
Front Dent. 2021 Sep 5;18:31. doi: 10.18502/fid.v18i31.7236. eCollection 2021.
6
The effect of framework fabrication technique on the fit accuracy of full arch screw retained implant supported prostheses.支架制作技术对全牙弓螺丝固位种植体支持式修复体适合精度的影响。
Saudi Dent J. 2022 May;34(4):288-297. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2022.03.006. Epub 2022 Apr 2.
7
Patient satisfaction and survival of maxillary overdentures supported by four or six splinted implants: a systematic review with meta-analysis.四或六枚支架式种植体支持的上颌覆盖义齿的患者满意度和存活率:系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 May 8;21(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01572-6.
8
Fit of complete-arch implant-supported prostheses produced from an intraoral scan by using an auxiliary device and from an elastomeric impression: A pilot clinical trial.使用辅助设备和弹性印模从口内扫描获得的全口种植体支持义齿的适合性:一项初步临床试验。
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Sep;128(3):404-414. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.10.024. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
9
Discrepancy at the implant abutment-prosthesis interface of complete-arch cobalt-chromium implant frameworks fabricated by additive and subtractive technologies before and after ceramic veneering.全瓷覆盖前后,采用增材和减材技术制作的全弓钴铬种植体框架在种植体基台-修复体界面处的差异。
J Prosthet Dent. 2021 May;125(5):795-803. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.03.018. Epub 2020 May 24.
10
Marginal Discrepancy of Single Implant-Supported Metal Copings Fabricated by Various CAD/CAM and Conventional Techniques Using Different Materials.采用不同材料通过各种CAD/CAM及传统技术制作的单颗种植体支持式金属基底冠的边缘差异
Eur J Dent. 2019 Oct;13(4):563-568. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1700364. Epub 2019 Nov 26.